| name | go-code-review |
| description | Auto-review Go code for 100+ common mistakes when analyzing .go files, discussing Go patterns, or reviewing PRs with Go code. Checks error handling, concurrency, interfaces, performance, testing, and stdlib usage. |
| allowed-tools | Read,Grep |
Go Code Review Skill
Auto-triggers when reviewing Go code to catch common mistakes from https://100go.co/
Review Process
- Read Go file(s) mentioned
- Check against patterns in [[knowledge-base.md]]
- Report issues with:
- Severity (Critical/Major/Minor)
- Location (file:line)
- Mistake # from knowledge base
- Suggested fix
- Code example if applicable
Priority Checks
Critical (must fix):
- Error handling (#48-54): ignored errors, incorrect wrapping/comparison
- Concurrency (#58, 69, 70, 74): data races, mutex misuse, sync type copying
- Resource leaks (#26, 28, 76, 79): unclosed resources, memory leaks
Major (should fix):
- Interface design (#5-7): pollution, wrong side, returning interfaces
- Goroutine lifecycle (#62, 63): no stop mechanism, loop var capture
- Testing (#83, 86): no race flag, sleep in tests
Minor (consider):
- Code organization (#1, 2, 15): shadowing, nesting, missing docs
- Performance (#21, 27, 39): unoptimized init, string concat
Reference Knowledge Base
See [[knowledge-base.md]] for full 100 Go mistakes reference.
Example Output
**Issue**: Error not wrapped with context
**Severity**: Major
**Location**: handler.go:42
**Mistake**: #49 - Ignoring When to Wrap an Error
**Fix**: Use `fmt.Errorf("fetch user: %w", err)` instead of returning raw error
**Pattern**: Always wrap errors for context/traceability