Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

metal-migration

@CharlesWiltgen/Axiom
135
0

Use when porting OpenGL/DirectX to Metal - translation layer vs native rewrite decisions, migration planning, anti-patterns

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name metal-migration
description Use when porting OpenGL/DirectX to Metal - translation layer vs native rewrite decisions, migration planning, anti-patterns
skill_type discipline
version 1.0.0
apple_platforms iOS 12+, macOS 10.14+, tvOS 12+

Metal Migration

Porting OpenGL/OpenGL ES or DirectX code to Metal on Apple platforms.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Porting an OpenGL/OpenGL ES codebase to iOS/macOS
  • Porting a DirectX codebase to Apple platforms
  • Deciding between translation layer (MetalANGLE) vs native rewrite
  • Planning a phased migration strategy
  • Evaluating effort vs performance tradeoffs

Red Flags

❌ "Just use MetalANGLE and ship" — Translation layers add 10-30% overhead; fine for demos, not production

❌ "Convert shaders one-by-one without planning" — State management differs fundamentally; you'll rewrite twice

❌ "Keep the GL state machine mental model" — Metal is explicit; thinking GL causes subtle bugs

❌ "Port everything at once" — Phased migration catches issues early; big-bang migrations hide compounding bugs

❌ "Skip validation layer during development" — Metal validation catches 80% of porting bugs with clear messages

❌ "Worry about coordinate systems later" — Y-flip and NDC differences cause the most debugging time

❌ "Performance will be the same or better automatically" — Metal requires explicit optimization; naive ports can be slower

Migration Strategy Decision Tree

Starting a port to Metal?
│
├─ Need working demo in <1 week?
│   ├─ OpenGL ES source? → MetalANGLE (translation layer)
│   │   └─ Caveats: 10-30% overhead, ES 2/3 only, no compute
│   │
│   └─ Vulkan available? → MoltenVK
│       └─ Caveats: Vulkan complexity, indirect translation
│
├─ Production app with performance requirements?
│   └─ Native Metal rewrite (recommended)
│       ├─ Phased: Keep GL for reference, port module-by-module
│       └─ Full: Clean rewrite using Metal idioms from start
│
├─ DirectX/HLSL source?
│   └─ Metal Shader Converter (Apple tool)
│       └─ Converts DXIL bytecode → Metal library
│       └─ See metal-migration-ref for usage
│
└─ Hybrid approach?
    └─ MetalANGLE for demo → Native Metal incrementally
        └─ Best of both: fast validation, optimal end state

Pattern 1: Translation Layer (Quick Demo Path)

When to use: Validate feasibility, get stakeholder buy-in, prototype

MetalANGLE Setup (OpenGL ES → Metal)

// 1. Add MetalANGLE via SPM or CocoaPods
// GitHub: nicklockwood/MetalANGLE

// 2. Replace EAGLContext with MGLContext
import MetalANGLE

let context = MGLContext(api: kMGLRenderingAPIOpenGLES3)
MGLContext.setCurrent(context)

// 3. Replace GLKView with MGLKView
let glView = MGLKView(frame: bounds, context: context)
glView.delegate = self
glView.drawableDepthFormat = .format24

// 4. Existing GL code works unchanged
glClearColor(0, 0, 0, 1)
glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT)
// ... your existing GL rendering code

Tradeoffs Table

Aspect MetalANGLE Native Metal
Time to demo Hours Days-weeks
Runtime overhead 10-30% Baseline
Shader changes None Full rewrite
Compute shaders Not supported Full support
Future-proof Translation debt Apple-recommended
Debugging GL tools only GPU Frame Capture
Thermal/battery Higher Optimizable

When MetalANGLE Fails

MetalANGLE will NOT work if your code:

  • Uses OpenGL ES extensions not in core ES 2/3
  • Relies on compute shaders (GL_COMPUTE_SHADER)
  • Requires precise GL state machine semantics
  • Needs performance within 10% of native
  • Targets visionOS (no translation layer support)

Pattern 2: Native Metal Rewrite (Production Path)

When to use: Production apps, performance-critical rendering, long-term maintenance

Phased Migration Strategy

Phase 1: Abstraction Layer (1-2 weeks)
├─ Create renderer interface hiding GL/Metal specifics
├─ Keep GL implementation as reference
├─ Define clear boundaries: setup, resources, draw, present
└─ Validate abstraction with existing tests

Phase 2: Metal Backend (2-4 weeks)
├─ Implement Metal renderer behind same interface
├─ Convert shaders GLSL → MSL (use metal-migration-ref)
├─ Run GL and Metal side-by-side for visual diff
├─ GPU Frame Capture for debugging
└─ Milestone: Feature parity, visual match

Phase 3: Optimization (1-2 weeks)
├─ Remove abstraction overhead where it hurts
├─ Use Metal-specific features (argument buffers, indirect)
├─ Profile with Metal System Trace
├─ Tune for thermal envelope and battery
└─ Remove GL backend entirely

Core Architecture Differences

Concept OpenGL Metal
State model Implicit, mutable Explicit, immutable PSO
Validation At draw time At PSO creation
Shader compilation Runtime (JIT) Build time (AOT)
Command submission Implicit Explicit command buffers
Resource binding Global state Per-encoder binding
Synchronization Driver-managed App-managed

MTKView Setup (Native Metal)

import MetalKit

class MetalRenderer: NSObject, MTKViewDelegate {
    let device: MTLDevice
    let commandQueue: MTLCommandQueue
    var pipelineState: MTLRenderPipelineState!

    init?(metalView: MTKView) {
        guard let device = MTLCreateSystemDefaultDevice(),
              let queue = device.makeCommandQueue() else {
            return nil
        }
        self.device = device
        self.commandQueue = queue

        metalView.device = device
        metalView.clearColor = MTLClearColor(red: 0, green: 0, blue: 0, alpha: 1)
        metalView.depthStencilPixelFormat = .depth32Float

        super.init()
        metalView.delegate = self

        buildPipeline(metalView: metalView)
    }

    private func buildPipeline(metalView: MTKView) {
        let library = device.makeDefaultLibrary()!
        let vertexFunction = library.makeFunction(name: "vertexShader")
        let fragmentFunction = library.makeFunction(name: "fragmentShader")

        let descriptor = MTLRenderPipelineDescriptor()
        descriptor.vertexFunction = vertexFunction
        descriptor.fragmentFunction = fragmentFunction
        descriptor.colorAttachments[0].pixelFormat = metalView.colorPixelFormat
        descriptor.depthAttachmentPixelFormat = metalView.depthStencilPixelFormat

        // Pre-validated at creation, not at draw time
        pipelineState = try! device.makeRenderPipelineState(descriptor: descriptor)
    }

    func draw(in view: MTKView) {
        guard let drawable = view.currentDrawable,
              let descriptor = view.currentRenderPassDescriptor,
              let commandBuffer = commandQueue.makeCommandBuffer(),
              let encoder = commandBuffer.makeRenderCommandEncoder(descriptor: descriptor) else {
            return
        }

        encoder.setRenderPipelineState(pipelineState)
        // Bind resources explicitly - nothing persists between draws
        encoder.setVertexBuffer(vertexBuffer, offset: 0, index: 0)
        encoder.setFragmentTexture(texture, index: 0)
        encoder.drawPrimitives(type: .triangle, vertexStart: 0, vertexCount: vertexCount)
        encoder.endEncoding()

        commandBuffer.present(drawable)
        commandBuffer.commit()
    }
}

Common Migration Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern 1: Keeping GL State Machine Mentality

BAD — Thinking in GL's implicit state:

// GL mental model: "set state, then draw"
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture)
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo)
glUseProgram(program)
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, vertexCount)
// State persists until changed — can draw again without rebinding

GOOD — Metal's explicit model:

// Metal: encode everything explicitly per draw
let encoder = commandBuffer.makeRenderCommandEncoder(descriptor: rpd)!
encoder.setRenderPipelineState(pipelineState)    // Always set
encoder.setVertexBuffer(vertexBuffer, offset: 0, index: 0)  // Always bind
encoder.setFragmentTexture(texture, index: 0)    // Always bind
encoder.drawPrimitives(type: .triangle, vertexStart: 0, vertexCount: count)
encoder.endEncoding()
// Nothing persists — next encoder starts fresh

Time cost: 30-60 min debugging "why did my texture disappear" vs 2 min understanding the model upfront.

Anti-Pattern 2: Ignoring Coordinate System Differences

BAD — Assuming GL coordinates work in Metal:

OpenGL:
- Origin: bottom-left
- Y-axis: up
- NDC Z range: [-1, 1]
- Texture origin: bottom-left

Metal:
- Origin: top-left
- Y-axis: down
- NDC Z range: [0, 1]
- Texture origin: top-left

GOOD — Explicit coordinate handling:

// Option 1: Flip Y in vertex shader
vertex float4 vertexShader(VertexIn in [[stage_in]]) {
    float4 pos = uniforms.mvp * float4(in.position, 1.0);
    pos.y = -pos.y;  // Flip Y for Metal's coordinate system
    return pos;
}

// Option 2: Flip texture coordinates in fragment shader
fragment float4 fragmentShader(VertexOut in [[stage_in]],
                                texture2d<float> tex [[texture(0)]],
                                sampler samp [[sampler(0)]]) {
    float2 uv = in.texCoord;
    uv.y = 1.0 - uv.y;  // Flip V for Metal's texture origin
    return tex.sample(samp, uv);
}
// Option 3: Use MTKTextureLoader with origin option
let options: [MTKTextureLoader.Option: Any] = [
    .origin: MTKTextureLoader.Origin.bottomLeft  // Match GL convention
]
let texture = try textureLoader.newTexture(URL: url, options: options)

Time cost: 2-4 hours debugging "upside down" or "mirrored" rendering vs 5 min reading this pattern.

Anti-Pattern 3: No Validation Layer During Development

BAD — Disabling validation for "performance":

// No validation — API misuse silently corrupts or crashes later

GOOD — Always enable during development:

In Xcode: Edit Scheme → Run → Diagnostics
✓ Metal API Validation
✓ Metal Shader Validation
✓ GPU Frame Capture (Metal)

Time cost: Hours debugging silent corruption vs immediate error messages with call stacks.

Anti-Pattern 4: Single Buffer Without Synchronization

BAD — CPU and GPU fight over same buffer:

// Frame N: CPU writes to buffer
// Frame N: GPU reads from buffer
// Frame N+1: CPU writes again — RACE CONDITION
buffer.contents().copyMemory(from: data, byteCount: size)

GOOD — Triple buffering with semaphore:

class TripleBufferedRenderer {
    let inflightSemaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 3)
    var buffers: [MTLBuffer] = []
    var bufferIndex = 0

    func draw(in view: MTKView) {
        // Wait for a buffer to become available
        inflightSemaphore.wait()

        let buffer = buffers[bufferIndex]
        // Safe to write — GPU finished with this buffer
        buffer.contents().copyMemory(from: data, byteCount: size)

        let commandBuffer = commandQueue.makeCommandBuffer()!
        commandBuffer.addCompletedHandler { [weak self] _ in
            self?.inflightSemaphore.signal()  // Release buffer
        }

        // ... encode and commit

        bufferIndex = (bufferIndex + 1) % 3
    }
}

Time cost: Hours debugging intermittent visual glitches vs 15 min implementing triple buffering.

Pressure Scenarios

Scenario 1: "Just Ship with MetalANGLE"

Situation: Deadline in 2 weeks. MetalANGLE demo works. PM says ship it.

Pressure: "We can optimize later. Users won't notice 20% overhead."

Why this fails:

  • Translation overhead compounds with complex scenes (visualizers, games)
  • No compute shader support limits future features
  • Technical debt grows — team learns MetalANGLE quirks, not Metal
  • Apple deprecation risk (OpenGL ES deprecated since iOS 12)
  • Battery/thermal complaints from users

Response template:

"MetalANGLE is viable for the demo milestone. For production, I recommend a 3-week buffer to implement native Metal for the render loop. This recovers the 20-30% overhead and eliminates deprecation risk. Can we scope the MVP to fewer visual effects to hit the deadline with native Metal?"

Scenario 2: "Port All Shaders This Sprint"

Situation: 50 GLSL shaders. Sprint is 2 weeks. Manager wants all converted.

Pressure: "They're just text files. How hard can shader conversion be?"

Why this fails:

  • GLSL → MSL isn't 1:1 (precision qualifiers, built-ins, sampling)
  • Each shader needs visual validation, not just compilation
  • Complex shaders need performance profiling
  • Bugs compound — broken shader A masks broken shader B

Response template:

"Shader conversion requires visual validation, not just compilation. I can convert 10-15 shaders/week with confidence. For 50 shaders: (1) Prioritize by usage — convert the 10 most-used first, (2) Automate mappings — type conversions, boilerplate, (3) Parallel validation — run GL and Metal side-by-side. Realistic timeline: 4-5 weeks for full conversion with quality."

Scenario 3: "We Don't Need GPU Frame Capture"

Situation: Developer says "I'll just use print statements to debug shaders."

Pressure: "GPU tools are overkill. I know what I'm doing."

Why this fails:

  • Print statements don't work in shaders
  • Visual bugs require seeing intermediate render targets
  • Performance issues require GPU timeline analysis
  • Metal validation errors need call stack context

Response template:

"GPU Frame Capture is the only way to inspect shader variables, see intermediate textures, and understand GPU timing. It takes 30 seconds to capture a frame. Without it, shader debugging is 10x slower — you're guessing instead of observing."

Pre-Migration Checklist

Before starting any port:

  • Inventory shaders: Count GLSL/HLSL files, complexity (LOC, features used)
  • Identify extensions: Which GL extensions does the code use? Metal equivalents?
  • Audit state management: How stateful is the renderer? Global state count?
  • Check compute usage: Any GL compute shaders? GPGPU? (MetalANGLE won't help)
  • Profile baseline: FPS, frame time, memory, thermal on reference platform
  • Define success criteria: Target FPS, memory budget, thermal envelope
  • Set up A/B testing: Can you run GL and Metal side-by-side for validation?
  • Enable validation: Metal API Validation, Shader Validation, Frame Capture

Post-Migration Checklist

After completing the port:

  • Visual parity: Side-by-side screenshots match reference
  • Performance parity or better: Frame time ≤ GL baseline
  • No validation errors: Clean run with Metal validation enabled
  • Thermal acceptable: Device doesn't throttle during normal use
  • Memory stable: No leaks over extended use
  • All code paths tested: Edge cases, error states, resize/rotate

Resources

WWDC: 2016-00602, 2018-00604, 2019-00611

Docs: /metal/migrating-opengl-code-to-metal, /metal/shader-converter

Tools: MetalANGLE, MoltenVK

Skills: metal-migration-ref, metal-migration-diag


Last Updated: 2025-12-29 Platforms: iOS 12+, macOS 10.14+, tvOS 12+ Status: Production-ready Metal migration patterns