| name | output-style-governance |
| description | Validate and govern output-style manifests under output-styles in the user workspace. |
| allowed-tools | Read |
| metadata | [object Object] |
Purpose
Validate output-style manifests so that preferred output styles selected via /output-style remain consistent with rules/98-output-styles.md and rules/98-communication-protocol.md.
Ensure each style manifest has correct frontmatter, clearly documented behavior, and does not weaken protocol invariants around safety, correctness, or structure.
IO Semantics
Input: Output-style manifest files under output-styles/*.md in the user workspace.
Output: Governance findings and suggested fixes for style manifests (for example, missing fields, protocol violations, or unclear behavior descriptions).
Side Effects: None directly; orchestration commands such as /llm-governance handle backups and writeback when applying suggested fixes.
Deterministic Steps
1. Target Discovery
- Locate output-style manifests in:
output-styles/*.mdwhen running inside the user workspace (~/.claude)
2. Frontmatter Validation
- Check that each manifest contains:
name: non-empty, lowercase identifier without spaces.description: concise human-readable description of the style.keep-coding-instructions: boolean flag.
- Flag manifests that:
- Omit required fields.
- Use identifiers that conflict with existing core styles or are ambiguous.
3. Protocol and Rule Compliance
- Scan manifest bodies for instructions that conflict with:
- Absolute prohibitions in
rules/98-communication-protocol.md(for example, emotional language or small talk if disallowed). - Invariants and constraints in
rules/98-output-styles.md(for example, attempts to weaken safety or encourage vague answers).
- Absolute prohibitions in
- Verify that manifests explicitly treat style instructions as additive to protocol invariants rather than replacements.
- Flag any instructions that attempt to override or ignore protocol prohibitions.
4. Style Behavior Clarity
- Check that each style manifest:
- States whether it builds on a core style (for example, default, explanatory, learning) or defines a new core style.
- Describes typical interaction patterns (for example, concise coding, explanatory insights, teaching interactions).
- Avoids unnecessary narrative unrelated to style behavior.
- Recommend improvements where style behavior is ambiguous or underspecified.
5. Integration with Governance Workflows
- When invoked by
agent:llm-governanceor/llm-governance:- Provide a structured list of findings per manifest (missing fields, violations, ambiguities).
- Suggest minimal, deterministic edits that bring manifests into compliance with
rules/98-output-styles.mdand protocol rules.
Validation Criteria
- All governed manifests include valid
name,description, andkeep-coding-instructionsfields. - No manifest contains instructions that contradict
rules/98-communication-protocol.mdorrules/98-output-styles.md. - Core styles (default, explanatory, learning) are present and consistent with their rule definitions when used.
- Extended styles document their relationship to core styles and keep technical behavior aligned with protocol invariants.