Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

daem0nmcp-protocol

@DasBluEyedDevil/Daem0n-MCP
0
0

Use when Daem0nMCP tools are available - enforces the sacred covenant (commune at session start, seek counsel before changes, inscribe decisions, seal outcomes)

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name daem0nmcp-protocol
description Use when Daem0nMCP tools are available - enforces the sacred covenant (commune at session start, seek counsel before changes, inscribe decisions, seal outcomes)

The Daem0n's Protocol

Overview

When Daem0nMCP memory tools are available, you MUST follow this protocol. Memory without discipline is noise.

Core principle: Check before you change, record what you decide, track whether it worked.

Tool Detection

First, verify Daem0nMCP tools are available:

Look for these tools in your available tools:
- mcp__daem0nmcp__get_briefing
- mcp__daem0nmcp__context_check
- mcp__daem0nmcp__remember
- mcp__daem0nmcp__record_outcome
- mcp__daem0nmcp__link_memories
- mcp__daem0nmcp__trace_chain
- mcp__daem0nmcp__get_graph

If tools are NOT available: This skill does not apply. Proceed normally.

If tools ARE available: Follow the protocol below. No exceptions.

The Protocol

1. SESSION START (Non-Negotiable)

IMMEDIATELY when you have daem0nmcp tools:

mcp__daem0nmcp__get_briefing()

DO NOT:
- Ask user what they want first
- Skip briefing because "it's a quick task"
- Assume you remember from last session

The briefing loads:

  • Past decisions and their outcomes
  • Warnings and failed approaches to AVOID
  • Patterns to FOLLOW
  • Git changes since last session

2. BEFORE ANY CODE CHANGES

BEFORE touching any file:

mcp__daem0nmcp__context_check(description="what you're about to do")

OR for specific files:

mcp__daem0nmcp__recall_for_file(file_path="path/to/file")

If context_check returns:

  • WARNING: You MUST acknowledge it to the user
  • FAILED APPROACH: Explain how your approach differs
  • must_not: These are HARD CONSTRAINTS - do not violate

3. AFTER MAKING DECISIONS

AFTER every significant decision:

memory_result = mcp__daem0nmcp__remember(
    category="decision",  # or "pattern", "warning", "learning"
    content="What you decided",
    rationale="Why you decided it",
    file_path="relevant/file.py",  # optional
    tags=["relevant", "tags"]
)

SAVE THE MEMORY ID - you need it for record_outcome

Category Guide:

Category Use For Persistence
decision Architectural/design choices Decays over 30 days
pattern Recurring approaches to follow PERMANENT
warning Things to avoid PERMANENT
learning Lessons from experience Decays over 30 days

4. AFTER IMPLEMENTATION (Critical)

AFTER implementing and testing:

mcp__daem0nmcp__record_outcome(
    memory_id=<id from remember>,
    outcome="What actually happened",
    worked=true  # or false
)

FAILURES ARE VALUABLE. If something doesn't work:

  • Record worked=false with explanation
  • Failed approaches get 1.5x boost in future searches
  • You WILL see past mistakes - that's the point

Red Flags - STOP

  • About to edit a file without calling recall_for_file
  • Making a significant decision without calling remember
  • Implementation complete but no record_outcome called
  • Context check returned WARNING but you didn't acknowledge it
  • Repeating an approach that previously failed

Rationalization Prevention

Excuse Reality
"It's a small change" Small changes compound into big problems
"I'll remember later" You won't. Record now.
"Context check is overkill" 5 seconds now vs hours debugging later
"The warning doesn't apply" Warnings exist because someone failed before
"I don't need to record failures" Failures are the most valuable memories

Workflow Summary

SESSION START
    └─> get_briefing()

BEFORE CHANGES
    └─> context_check("what you're doing")
    └─> recall_for_file("path") for specific files
    └─> ACKNOWLEDGE any warnings

AFTER DECISIONS
    └─> remember(category, content, rationale)
    └─> SAVE the memory_id
    └─> link_memories() if causally related to other decisions

AFTER IMPLEMENTATION
    └─> record_outcome(memory_id, outcome, worked)

INVESTIGATING CONTEXT
    └─> trace_chain() to understand decision history
    └─> get_graph() to visualize relationships

Why This Matters

Without protocol discipline:

  • You repeat past mistakes
  • Decisions get lost between sessions
  • Patterns aren't captured
  • Failures aren't learned from
  • The memory system becomes useless noise

With protocol discipline:

  • Past mistakes surface before you repeat them
  • Decisions persist across sessions
  • Patterns compound into project knowledge
  • Failures become learning opportunities
  • The AI actually gets smarter over time

Graph Memory Tools

Memories can be explicitly linked to create a knowledge graph. Use these when decisions are causally related.

Relationship Types

Type Meaning Example
led_to A caused/resulted in B "PostgreSQL choice led to connection pooling pattern"
supersedes A replaces B (B is outdated) "New auth flow supersedes old JWT approach"
depends_on A requires B to be valid "Caching strategy depends on database choice"
conflicts_with A contradicts B "Sync processing conflicts with async pattern"
related_to General association "Both relate to authentication"

Link Memories

mcp__daem0nmcp__link_memories(
    source_id=<memory_id>,
    target_id=<other_memory_id>,
    relationship="led_to",
    description="Optional context for the link"
)

When to link:

  • A decision directly caused another decision
  • A pattern emerged from a specific choice
  • An approach supersedes a previous one

Trace Causal Chains

mcp__daem0nmcp__trace_chain(
    memory_id=<id>,
    direction="backward",  # "forward", "backward", or "both"
    max_depth=5
)

Use cases:

  • "What decisions led to this pattern?" → trace backward
  • "What emerged from this architectural choice?" → trace forward
  • "Show me the full context around this decision" → trace both

Visualize the Graph

mcp__daem0nmcp__get_graph(
    memory_ids=[1, 2, 3],  # OR
    topic="authentication",
    format="mermaid"  # or "json"
)

Returns a mermaid diagram or JSON structure showing nodes and edges.

Remove Links

mcp__daem0nmcp__unlink_memories(
    source_id=<id>,
    target_id=<id>,
    relationship="led_to"
)

The Bottom Line

Memory tools exist. Use them correctly.

Check context. Record decisions. Track outcomes. Link related memories.

This is non-negotiable when Daem0nMCP tools are available.