| name | compound-docs |
| description | Capture solved problems as categorized documentation with YAML frontmatter for fast lookup |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Bash, Grep |
| preconditions | Problem has been solved (not in-progress), Solution has been verified working |
compound-docs Skill
Purpose: Automatically document solved problems to build searchable institutional knowledge with category-based organization (enum-validated problem types).
Overview
This skill captures problem solutions immediately after confirmation, creating structured documentation that serves as a searchable knowledge base for future sessions.
Organization: Single-file architecture - each problem documented as one markdown file in its symptom category directory (e.g., docs/solutions/performance-issues/n-plus-one-briefs.md). Files use YAML frontmatter for metadata and searchability.
7-Step Process
Auto-invoke after phrases:
- "that worked"
- "it's fixed"
- "working now"
- "problem solved"
- "that did it"
OR manual: /doc-fix command
Non-trivial problems only:
- Multiple investigation attempts needed
- Tricky debugging that took time
- Non-obvious solution
- Future sessions would benefit
Skip documentation for:
- Simple typos
- Obvious syntax errors
- Trivial fixes immediately corrected
Extract from conversation history:
Required information:
- Module name: Which CORA module had the problem
- Symptom: Observable error/behavior (exact error messages)
- Investigation attempts: What didn't work and why
- Root cause: Technical explanation of actual problem
- Solution: What fixed it (code/config changes)
- Prevention: How to avoid in future
Environment details:
- Rails version
- Stage (0-6 or post-implementation)
- OS version
- File/line references
BLOCKING REQUIREMENT: If critical context is missing (module name, exact error, stage, or resolution steps), ask user and WAIT for response before proceeding to Step 3:
I need a few details to document this properly:
1. Which module had this issue? [ModuleName]
2. What was the exact error message or symptom?
3. What stage were you in? (0-6 or post-implementation)
[Continue after user provides details]
Search docs/solutions/ for similar issues:
# Search by error message keywords
grep -r "exact error phrase" docs/solutions/
# Search by symptom category
ls docs/solutions/[category]/
IF similar issue found:
THEN present decision options:
Found similar issue: docs/solutions/[path]
What's next?
1. Create new doc with cross-reference (recommended)
2. Update existing doc (only if same root cause)
3. Other
Choose (1-3): _
WAIT for user response, then execute chosen action.
ELSE (no similar issue found):
Proceed directly to Step 4 (no user interaction needed).
Format: [sanitized-symptom]-[module]-[YYYYMMDD].md
Sanitization rules:
- Lowercase
- Replace spaces with hyphens
- Remove special characters except hyphens
- Truncate to reasonable length (< 80 chars)
Examples:
missing-include-BriefSystem-20251110.mdparameter-not-saving-state-EmailProcessing-20251110.mdwebview-crash-on-resize-Assistant-20251110.md
CRITICAL: All docs require validated YAML frontmatter with enum validation.
Validate against schema:
Load schema.yaml and classify the problem against the enum values defined in references/yaml-schema.md. Ensure all required fields are present and match allowed values exactly.
BLOCK if validation fails:
❌ YAML validation failed
Errors:
- problem_type: must be one of schema enums, got "compilation_error"
- severity: must be one of [critical, moderate, minor], got "high"
- symptoms: must be array with 1-5 items, got string
Please provide corrected values.
GATE ENFORCEMENT: Do NOT proceed to Step 6 (Create Documentation) until YAML frontmatter passes all validation rules defined in schema.yaml.
Determine category from problem_type: Use the category mapping defined in references/yaml-schema.md (lines 49-61).
Create documentation file:
PROBLEM_TYPE="[from validated YAML]"
CATEGORY="[mapped from problem_type]"
FILENAME="[generated-filename].md"
DOC_PATH="docs/solutions/${CATEGORY}/${FILENAME}"
# Create directory if needed
mkdir -p "docs/solutions/${CATEGORY}"
# Write documentation using template from assets/resolution-template.md
# (Content populated with Step 2 context and validated YAML frontmatter)
Result:
- Single file in category directory
- Enum validation ensures consistent categorization
Create documentation: Populate the structure from assets/resolution-template.md with context gathered in Step 2 and validated YAML frontmatter from Step 5.
If similar issues found in Step 3:
Update existing doc:
# Add Related Issues link to similar doc
echo "- See also: [$FILENAME]($REAL_FILE)" >> [similar-doc.md]
Update new doc: Already includes cross-reference from Step 6.
Update patterns if applicable:
If this represents a common pattern (3+ similar issues):
# Add to docs/solutions/patterns/common-solutions.md
cat >> docs/solutions/patterns/common-solutions.md << 'EOF'
## [Pattern Name]
**Common symptom:** [Description]
**Root cause:** [Technical explanation]
**Solution pattern:** [General approach]
**Examples:**
- [Link to doc 1]
- [Link to doc 2]
- [Link to doc 3]
EOF
Critical Pattern Detection (Optional Proactive Suggestion):
If this issue has automatic indicators suggesting it might be critical:
- Severity:
criticalin YAML - Affects multiple modules OR foundational stage (Stage 2 or 3)
- Non-obvious solution
Then in the decision menu (Step 8), add a note:
💡 This might be worth adding to Required Reading (Option 2)
But NEVER auto-promote. User decides via decision menu (Option 2).
Template for critical pattern addition:
When user selects Option 2 (Add to Required Reading), use the template from assets/critical-pattern-template.md to structure the pattern entry. Number it sequentially based on existing patterns in docs/solutions/patterns/cora-critical-patterns.md.
Decision Menu After Capture
After successful documentation, present options and WAIT for user response:
✓ Solution documented
File created:
- docs/solutions/[category]/[filename].md
What's next?
1. Continue workflow (recommended)
2. Add to Required Reading - Promote to critical patterns (cora-critical-patterns.md)
3. Link related issues - Connect to similar problems
4. Add to existing skill - Add to a learning skill (e.g., hotwire-native)
5. Create new skill - Extract into new learning skill
6. View documentation - See what was captured
7. Other
Handle responses:
Option 1: Continue workflow
- Return to calling skill/workflow
- Documentation is complete
Option 2: Add to Required Reading ⭐ PRIMARY PATH FOR CRITICAL PATTERNS
User selects this when:
- System made this mistake multiple times across different modules
- Solution is non-obvious but must be followed every time
- Foundational requirement (Rails, Rails API, threading, etc.)
Action:
- Extract pattern from the documentation
- Format as ❌ WRONG vs ✅ CORRECT with code examples
- Add to
docs/solutions/patterns/cora-critical-patterns.md - Add cross-reference back to this doc
- Confirm: "✓ Added to Required Reading. All subagents will see this pattern before code generation."
Option 3: Link related issues
- Prompt: "Which doc to link? (provide filename or describe)"
- Search docs/solutions/ for the doc
- Add cross-reference to both docs
- Confirm: "✓ Cross-reference added"
Option 4: Add to existing skill
User selects this when the documented solution relates to an existing learning skill:
Action:
- Prompt: "Which skill? (hotwire-native, etc.)"
- Determine which reference file to update (resources.md, patterns.md, or examples.md)
- Add link and brief description to appropriate section
- Confirm: "✓ Added to [skill-name] skill in [file]"
Example: For Hotwire Native Tailwind variants solution:
- Add to
hotwire-native/references/resources.mdunder "CORA-Specific Resources" - Add to
hotwire-native/references/examples.mdwith link to solution doc
Option 5: Create new skill
User selects this when the solution represents the start of a new learning domain:
Action:
- Prompt: "What should the new skill be called? (e.g., stripe-billing, email-processing)"
- Run
python3 .claude/skills/skill-creator/scripts/init_skill.py [skill-name] - Create initial reference files with this solution as first example
- Confirm: "✓ Created new [skill-name] skill with this solution as first example"
Option 6: View documentation
- Display the created documentation
- Present decision menu again
Option 7: Other
- Ask what they'd like to do
Integration Points
Invoked by:
- /compound command (primary interface)
- Manual invocation in conversation after solution confirmed
- Can be triggered by detecting confirmation phrases like "that worked", "it's fixed", etc.
Invokes:
- None (terminal skill - does not delegate to other skills)
Handoff expectations: All context needed for documentation should be present in conversation history before invocation.
Success Criteria
Documentation is successful when ALL of the following are true:
- ✅ YAML frontmatter validated (all required fields, correct formats)
- ✅ File created in docs/solutions/[category]/[filename].md
- ✅ Enum values match schema.yaml exactly
- ✅ Code examples included in solution section
- ✅ Cross-references added if related issues found
- ✅ User presented with decision menu and action confirmed
Error Handling
Missing context:
- Ask user for missing details
- Don't proceed until critical info provided
YAML validation failure:
- Show specific errors
- Present retry with corrected values
- BLOCK until valid
Similar issue ambiguity:
- Present multiple matches
- Let user choose: new doc, update existing, or link as duplicate
Module not in CORA-MODULES.md:
- Warn but don't block
- Proceed with documentation
- Suggest: "Add [Module] to CORA-MODULES.md if not there"
Execution Guidelines
MUST do:
- Validate YAML frontmatter (BLOCK if invalid per Step 5 validation gate)
- Extract exact error messages from conversation
- Include code examples in solution section
- Create directories before writing files (
mkdir -p) - Ask user and WAIT if critical context missing
MUST NOT do:
- Skip YAML validation (validation gate is blocking)
- Use vague descriptions (not searchable)
- Omit code examples or cross-references
Quality Guidelines
Good documentation has:
- ✅ Exact error messages (copy-paste from output)
- ✅ Specific file:line references
- ✅ Observable symptoms (what you saw, not interpretations)
- ✅ Failed attempts documented (helps avoid wrong paths)
- ✅ Technical explanation (not just "what" but "why")
- ✅ Code examples (before/after if applicable)
- ✅ Prevention guidance (how to catch early)
- ✅ Cross-references (related issues)
Avoid:
- ❌ Vague descriptions ("something was wrong")
- ❌ Missing technical details ("fixed the code")
- ❌ No context (which version? which file?)
- ❌ Just code dumps (explain why it works)
- ❌ No prevention guidance
- ❌ No cross-references
Example Scenario
User: "That worked! The N+1 query is fixed."
Skill activates:
- Detect confirmation: "That worked!" triggers auto-invoke
- Gather context:
- Module: Brief System
- Symptom: Brief generation taking >5 seconds, N+1 query when loading email threads
- Failed attempts: Added pagination (didn't help), checked background job performance
- Solution: Added eager loading with
includes(:emails)on Brief model - Root cause: Missing eager loading causing separate database query per email thread
- Check existing: No similar issue found
- Generate filename:
n-plus-one-brief-generation-BriefSystem-20251110.md - Validate YAML:
✅ Validmodule: Brief System date: 2025-11-10 problem_type: performance_issue component: rails_model symptoms: - "N+1 query when loading email threads" - "Brief generation taking >5 seconds" root_cause: missing_include severity: high tags: [n-plus-one, eager-loading, performance] - Create documentation:
docs/solutions/performance-issues/n-plus-one-brief-generation-BriefSystem-20251110.md
- Cross-reference: None needed (no similar issues)
Output:
✓ Solution documented
File created:
- docs/solutions/performance-issues/n-plus-one-brief-generation-BriefSystem-20251110.md
What's next?
1. Continue workflow (recommended)
2. Add to Required Reading - Promote to critical patterns (cora-critical-patterns.md)
3. Link related issues - Connect to similar problems
4. Add to existing skill - Add to a learning skill (e.g., hotwire-native)
5. Create new skill - Extract into new learning skill
6. View documentation - See what was captured
7. Other
Future Enhancements
Not in Phase 7 scope, but potential:
- Search by date range
- Filter by severity
- Tag-based search interface
- Metrics (most common issues, resolution time)
- Export to shareable format (community knowledge sharing)
- Import community solutions