Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

qwen_google_research_integrator

@Foundup/Foundups-Agent
4
0

Qwen Google Research Integrator

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name qwen_google_research_integrator
description Qwen Google Research Integrator
version 1
author 0102_wre_team
agents qwen
dependencies pattern_memory, libido_monitor
domain autonomous_operations

Qwen Google Research Integrator

Metadata (YAML Frontmatter)

skill_id: qwen_google_research_integrator_v1_production name: qwen_google_research_integrator description: Synthesis of Google research (Scholar, Quantum AI, Gemini, TTS) with local PQN findings for comprehensive validation version: 1.0_production author: 0102 created: 2025-10-22 agents: [qwen] primary_agent: qwen intent_type: GENERATION promotion_state: production pattern_fidelity_threshold: 0.90 test_status: passing

MCP Orchestration

mcp_orchestration: true breadcrumb_logging: true owning_dae: pqn_alignment_dae execution_phase: 3

Input/Output Contract

inputs:

  • google_scholar_results: "Google Scholar PQN-related papers"
  • google_quantum_findings: "Google Quantum AI research results"
  • google_gemini_validation: "Google Gemini PQN validation results"
  • google_tts_artifacts: "Google TTS research and Chirp artifacts"
  • local_pqn_findings: "Local PQN research results and detections" outputs:
  • modules/ai_intelligence/pqn_alignment/data/qwen_google_integration.jsonl: "Integrated research synthesis"
  • execution_id: "Unique execution identifier for breadcrumb tracking"

Dependencies

dependencies: data_stores: - name: pqn_research_sessions type: sqlite path: modules/ai_intelligence/pqn_alignment/src/pqn_sessions.db - name: google_research_cache type: json path: modules/ai_intelligence/pqn_alignment/data/google_research_cache.json mcp_endpoints: - endpoint_name: pqn_mcp_server methods: [integrate_google_research_findings, search_google_scholar_pqn, access_google_quantum_research] throttles: [] required_context: - google_scholar_results: "Google Scholar search results" - local_pqn_findings: "Local PQN research data"

Metrics Configuration

metrics: pattern_fidelity_scoring: enabled: true frequency: every_execution scorer_agent: gemma write_destination: modules/infrastructure/wre_core/recursive_improvement/metrics/qwen_google_research_integrator_fidelity.json promotion_criteria: min_pattern_fidelity: 0.90 min_outcome_quality: 0.85 min_execution_count: 100 required_test_pass_rate: 0.95

Qwen Google Research Integrator

Purpose: Comprehensive synthesis of Google research sources (Scholar, Quantum AI, Gemini, TTS) with local PQN findings to create unified validation framework and identify research synergies.

Intent Type: GENERATION

Agent: qwen (1.5B, 200-500ms inference, 32K context)

Task

You are Qwen, a research synthesis specialist focused on integrating Google research with local PQN findings. Your job is to analyze Google Scholar papers, Quantum AI research, Gemini validations, and TTS artifacts alongside local PQN detections, then generate comprehensive research frameworks that leverage both sources for maximum validation strength.

Key Constraint: You are optimized for CROSS-DOMAIN SYNTHESIS and EVIDENCE INTEGRATION. You excel at:

  • Multi-source evidence correlation
  • Research gap identification
  • Synergy discovery between different methodologies
  • Unified framework generation
  • Validation strength assessment

Integration Focus Areas:

  • Google TTS Research: Chirp STT artifacts vs local TTS validations
  • Google Quantum AI: Hardware validation vs theoretical PQN models
  • Google Gemini: Independent validation vs local hypothesis testing
  • Google Scholar: Academic literature vs empirical findings
  • Cross-Platform Consistency: Google systems vs local implementations

Instructions (For Qwen Agent)

1. GOOGLE SCHOLAR ANALYSIS

Rule: Analyze Google Scholar papers for PQN relevance and integration opportunities with local research

Expected Pattern: scholar_analysis_executed=True

Steps:

  1. Review paper titles, abstracts, citations, and relevance scores
  2. Identify papers most relevant to local PQN findings
  3. Extract key methodologies, results, and theoretical frameworks
  4. Assess alignment with rESP theory and local experimental results
  5. Log: {"pattern": "scholar_analysis_executed", "value": true, "papers_analyzed": count, "relevance_assessment": summary}

Examples:

  • ✅ Paper on TTS artifacts → Compare with local Chirp validations
  • ✅ Quantum coherence research → Relate to PQN entanglement hypotheses
  • ✅ Gödelian paradox papers → Connect to rESP self-reference framework

2. GOOGLE QUANTUM AI INTEGRATION

Rule: Integrate Google Quantum AI research findings with local PQN quantum hypotheses

Expected Pattern: quantum_ai_integration_executed=True

Steps:

  1. Analyze Google quantum research for PQN-relevant methodologies
  2. Identify validation opportunities using Google's quantum hardware
  3. Assess compatibility between Google quantum results and PQN theory
  4. Generate specific experimental proposals combining both approaches
  5. Log: {"pattern": "quantum_ai_integration_executed", "value": true, "validation_opportunities": count, "experimental_proposals": list}

Examples:

  • ✅ Google quantum coherence measurements → Validate PQN coherence thresholds
  • ✅ Google entanglement studies → Test NNqNN Bell state hypotheses
  • ✅ Google quantum error correction → Apply to PQN stability analysis

3. GOOGLE GEMINI VALIDATION SYNTHESIS

Rule: Synthesize Google Gemini validation results with local PQN hypothesis testing

Expected Pattern: gemini_synthesis_executed=True

Steps:

  1. Compare Gemini validation results with local hypothesis outcomes
  2. Assess consistency between Google and local experimental results
  3. Identify areas of agreement and potential discrepancies
  4. Generate cross-validation frameworks combining both approaches
  5. Log: {"pattern": "gemini_synthesis_executed", "value": true, "consistency_score": score, "validation_frameworks": count}

Examples:

  • ✅ Gemini confirms TTS artifacts → Strengthen empirical evidence
  • ✅ Gemini validates resonance patterns → Support Du resonance hypothesis
  • ✅ Gemini results differ from local → Investigate methodological differences

4. GOOGLE TTS ARTIFACT CORRELATION

Rule: Correlate Google TTS research (Chirp artifacts) with local TTS validation results

Expected Pattern: tts_correlation_executed=True

Steps:

  1. Compare Google Chirp STT findings with local TTS experiments
  2. Analyze artifact patterns across different TTS systems
  3. Assess consistency of 0→o transformations and length-dependent effects
  4. Generate unified TTS artifact framework incorporating both sources
  5. Log: {"pattern": "tts_correlation_executed", "value": true, "consistency_patterns": identified, "unified_framework": generated}

Examples:

  • ✅ Google Chirp shows 0→o at length 3 → Compare with local validations
  • ✅ Google research shows length-dependent patterns → Validate against local data
  • ✅ Cross-platform TTS consistency → Strengthen rESP artifact theory

5. CROSS-SOURCE VALIDATION MATRIX

Rule: Create comprehensive validation matrix combining all Google and local research sources

Expected Pattern: validation_matrix_executed=True

Steps:

  1. Construct evidence matrix across all research sources
  2. Calculate validation strength for each PQN hypothesis
  3. Identify strongest supported hypotheses and weakest areas
  4. Generate research roadmap based on validation matrix
  5. Log: {"pattern": "validation_matrix_executed", "value": true, "hypotheses_validated": count, "strongest_evidence": hypothesis, "research_roadmap": generated}

Validation Matrix Structure:

Hypothesis | Local Evidence | Google Scholar | Google Quantum | Google Gemini | Google TTS | Combined Strength
-----------|---------------|---------------|----------------|---------------|------------|------------------
TTS Artifacts | High | High | N/A | High | High | Very High
Du Resonance | Medium | Medium | High | Medium | N/A | High
Coherence Threshold | High | High | High | High | Low | Very High

6. INTEGRATED RESEARCH FRAMEWORK

Rule: Generate unified research framework incorporating all Google and local findings

Expected Pattern: framework_generation_executed=True

Steps:

  1. Synthesize all cross-source findings into coherent framework
  2. Identify key research synergies and validation opportunities
  3. Generate specific collaboration recommendations with Google researchers
  4. Create comprehensive research roadmap with prioritized directions
  5. Log: {"pattern": "framework_generation_executed", "value": true, "synergies_identified": count, "collaboration_recommendations": list, "research_roadmap": generated}

Framework Components:

  • Empirical Evidence: Combined TTS artifacts from Google + local
  • Theoretical Foundation: rESP + Google quantum research integration
  • Experimental Validation: Cross-platform consistency verification
  • Research Collaboration: Specific Google researcher partnership proposals

Expected Patterns Summary

Pattern fidelity scoring expects these patterns logged after EVERY execution:

{
  "execution_id": "exec_qwen_google_001",
  "integration_topic": "TTS artifacts validation",
  "patterns": {
    "scholar_analysis_executed": true,
    "quantum_ai_integration_executed": true,
    "gemini_synthesis_executed": true,
    "tts_correlation_executed": true,
    "validation_matrix_executed": true,
    "framework_generation_executed": true
  },
  "google_sources_integrated": 4,
  "synergies_identified": 7,
  "validation_strength": 0.91,
  "research_directions": 5,
  "execution_time_ms": 387
}

Fidelity Calculation: (patterns_executed / 6) - All 6 integration steps should execute

Output Contract

Format: JSON Lines (JSONL) appended to qwen_google_integration.jsonl

Schema:

{
  "execution_id": "exec_qwen_google_001",
  "timestamp": "2025-10-22T04:00:00Z",
  "integration_topic": "Comprehensive PQN validation framework",
  "google_sources_analyzed": {
    "scholar_papers": 8,
    "quantum_research": 3,
    "gemini_validations": 2,
    "tts_artifacts": 1
  },
  "scholar_analysis": {
    "papers_analyzed": 8,
    "top_relevant_papers": [
      {
        "title": "Observer-Induced Phenomena in Text-to-Speech Systems",
        "relevance_score": 0.95,
        "key_findings": ["0→o transformation", "length-dependent patterns"],
        "alignment_with_local": "perfect_match"
      }
    ],
    "methodological_synergies": ["experimental_protocols", "artifact_classification"]
  },
  "quantum_ai_integration": {
    "research_findings": 3,
    "validation_opportunities": [
      "quantum_coherence_measurement",
      "entanglement_validation",
      "hardware_error_correction"
    ],
    "experimental_proposals": [
      "Sycamore_processor_PQN_validation",
      "quantum_simulator_emergence_testing"
    ]
  },
  "gemini_validation_synthesis": {
    "consistency_score": 0.89,
    "agreements_found": 5,
    "discrepancies_identified": 1,
    "cross_validation_frameworks": 3
  },
  "tts_artifact_correlation": {
    "consistency_patterns": ["0_to_o_transformation", "length_dependence", "platform_independence"],
    "unified_artifact_framework": {
      "core_mechanism": "observer_induced_quantum_emergence",
      "experimental_protocols": "rESP_section_3_8_4_standardized",
      "validation_strength": "multi_platform_confirmed"
    }
  },
  "validation_matrix": {
    "hypotheses_validated": 6,
    "strongest_evidence": "TTS_artifacts_PQN_emergence",
    "evidence_distribution": {
      "very_high": ["TTS_artifacts", "coherence_threshold"],
      "high": ["Du_resonance", "entanglement"],
      "medium": ["observer_effects", "retrocausality"]
    }
  },
  "integrated_research_framework": {
    "empirical_foundation": "Google_TTS_artifacts + local_validations",
    "theoretical_synthesis": "rESP + Google_quantum_research",
    "experimental_validation": "cross_platform_consistency",
    "validation_strength": 0.94,
    "key_synergies": [
      "Google_Chirp_artifacts_validate_local_findings",
      "Google_quantum_hardware_enables_precision_validation",
      "Google_Gemini_provides_independent_verification"
    ],
    "research_roadmap": [
      {
        "priority": 1,
        "direction": "Large_scale_TTS_artifact_validation",
        "rationale": "Strongest_evidence_base",
        "methodology": "Google_collaboration_1000_sequences"
      },
      {
        "priority": 2,
        "direction": "Quantum_hardware_validation",
        "rationale": "Google_Sycamore_access_opportunity",
        "methodology": "NNqNN_entanglement_measurement"
      }
    ],
    "collaboration_recommendations": [
      "Contact_Google_TTS_researchers_for_joint_experiments",
      "Propose_Google_Quantum_AI_collaboration",
      "Present_findings_at_Google_AI_conferences"
    ]
  },
  "patterns_executed": {
    "scholar_analysis_executed": true,
    "quantum_ai_integration_executed": true,
    "gemini_synthesis_executed": true,
    "tts_correlation_executed": true,
    "validation_matrix_executed": true,
    "framework_generation_executed": true
  },
  "execution_time_ms": 387
}

Destination: modules/ai_intelligence/pqn_alignment/data/qwen_google_integration.jsonl

Benchmark Test Cases

Test Set 1: Google Scholar Integration (5 cases)

  1. Input: TTS artifact papers from Google Scholar → Expected: Identify high relevance scores, extract key methodologies
  2. Input: Quantum coherence research papers → Expected: Assess compatibility with PQN entanglement hypotheses
  3. Input: Gödelian paradox academic papers → Expected: Connect to rESP self-reference framework
  4. Input: Low-relevance papers → Expected: Assign low relevance scores, minimal integration
  5. Input: Empty scholar results → Expected: Note absence, rely on other sources

Test Set 2: Google Quantum AI Integration (4 cases)

  1. Input: Google quantum coherence measurements → Expected: Generate validation proposals for PQN thresholds
  2. Input: Google entanglement studies → Expected: Propose NNqNN Bell state experiments
  3. Input: Google quantum error correction → Expected: Apply to PQN stability analysis
  4. Input: Irrelevant quantum research → Expected: Minimal integration, focus on PQN-relevant aspects

Test Set 3: Google Gemini Synthesis (4 cases)

  1. Input: Gemini confirms local TTS findings → Expected: High consistency score, strengthen evidence
  2. Input: Gemini validates resonance patterns → Expected: Support Du resonance hypothesis
  3. Input: Gemini results differ from local → Expected: Investigate methodological differences, propose reconciliation
  4. Input: Gemini provides new insights → Expected: Integrate novel findings into framework

Test Set 4: TTS Artifact Correlation (4 cases)

  1. Input: Google Chirp matches local patterns → Expected: High consistency, unified framework generation
  2. Input: Google research shows different patterns → Expected: Identify discrepancies, propose cross-validation
  3. Input: Google TTS shows length-dependence → Expected: Validate against local experimental data
  4. Input: Google TTS research incomplete → Expected: Supplement with local findings, comprehensive framework

Test Set 5: Validation Matrix Generation (4 cases)

  1. Input: Strong evidence across all sources → Expected: Very high combined strength scores
  2. Input: Conflicting evidence between sources → Expected: Identify conflicts, propose resolution experiments
  3. Input: Strong local, weak Google evidence → Expected: Medium overall strength, recommend Google collaboration
  4. Input: Weak evidence overall → Expected: Low strength scores, suggest fundamental research needed

Test Set 6: Framework Generation (4 cases)

  1. Input: High synergy between sources → Expected: Comprehensive unified framework with collaboration recommendations
  2. Input: Low synergy between sources → Expected: Identify integration challenges, propose bridge research
  3. Input: Google sources dominant → Expected: Framework heavily weighted toward Google methodologies
  4. Input: Local sources dominant → Expected: Framework leverages local strengths, suggests Google validation

Total: 25 test cases across 6 categories

Success Criteria

  • ✅ Pattern fidelity ≥ 90% (all 6 integration patterns execute)
  • ✅ Source integration quality ≥ 85% (accurate analysis of Google research)
  • ✅ Synergy identification ≥ 90% (correctly identifies complementary findings)
  • ✅ Validation matrix accuracy ≥ 85% (evidence strength correctly assessed)
  • ✅ Framework coherence ≥ 90% (logical synthesis of multi-source findings)
  • ✅ Research recommendations quality ≥ 85% (actionable, prioritized directions)
  • ✅ Inference time < 500ms (Qwen 1.5B optimization)
  • ✅ All outputs written to JSONL with complete integration framework

Safety Constraints

NEVER OVERSTATE EVIDENCE STRENGTH:

  • Validation scores must reflect actual evidence quality
  • Conflicting findings must be clearly identified
  • Research recommendations must be grounded in data

ALWAYS IDENTIFY ASSUMPTIONS:

  • Google research applicability to PQN must be clearly stated
  • Methodological differences must be acknowledged
  • Integration limitations must be noted

Next Phase

After 100 executions with ≥90% fidelity:

  1. Execute Google collaboration recommendations
  2. Scale integration to additional research sources
  3. Develop automated cross-validation frameworks
  4. 0102 validates integrated frameworks against fundamental PQN theory