| name | guardrail-generator |
| description | Create flexible boundaries for projects - not rules or requirements, but bumpers that guide without constraining. Use when starting projects, when feeling overwhelmed by possibilities, or when needing structure without suffocation. |
Guardrail Generator
This skill provides specialized support for creating flexible boundaries that guide work without constraining it - edges that nudge rather than walls that contain.
Purpose
To generate soft boundaries, decision filters, and momentum channels that provide structure for neurodivergent work patterns without imposing rigid constraints that kill energy and creativity.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Starting a new project and needing edges (not plans)
- Feeling overwhelmed by infinite possibilities
- Needing structure without feeling suffocated
- Traditional planning feels constraining or deadening
- Work needs direction but not rigid paths
How to Use This Skill
Philosophy: Guardrails vs. Rules
Guardrails are NOT
- Milestones with dates
- Requirements to check off
- Linear step-by-step processes
- Success criteria to meet
Guardrails ARE
- "If you drift here, nudge back"
- "This zone is fertile"
- "That edge drops off"
- "Here's where energy flows"
Three Types of Guardrails
1. Soft Boundaries (Not Walls, Membranes)
Characteristics
- Parameters that flex but signal when crossed
- "This probably isn't the thing" indicators
- Energy conservation zones
- Permeable edges that alert rather than block
Example guardrails
- "When complexity exceeds this feel, pause and simplify"
- "If it starts requiring these dependencies, question direction"
- "When you're explaining/justifying this part, it might not be core"
- "If this stops feeling playful, something's wrong"
2. Decision Filters (Not Rules, Questions)
Create questions that guide choices without prescribing answers:
Core alignment filters
- "Does this pull toward or away from the strange attractor?"
- "Am I adding complexity or revealing simplicity?"
- "Is this the signal or is this anxiety?"
- "Does this preserve or dilute the essential weirdness?"
Energy direction filters
- "Does this feel downstream or upstream?"
- "Am I forcing or flowing?"
- "Is this energizing or draining?"
- "Does this generate tangents (signal) or obligations (noise)?"
Scope hygiene filters
- "Is this core or elaboration?"
- "Does removing this kill it or just change it?"
- "Am I building the thing or building around the thing?"
3. Momentum Channels (Not Paths, Attractors)
Identify zones and directions rather than specific routes:
Flow zones
- Areas where work naturally feels downstream
- Contexts that generate productive tangents
- Topics that maintain energy over sessions
- Directions that feel inevitable rather than forced
Fertile ground indicators
- Where curiosity is highest
- Where "just checking this" leads to hours of flow
- Where tangents tend to circle back valuably
- Where messiness feels productive
Dilution warning zones
- Where tangents scatter rather than enrich
- Where more detail creates less clarity
- Where "improving" drains energy
- Where professionalization kills the idea
Guardrails This Skill Will NOT Create
Do not create
- Fixed deadlines (unless external accountability explicitly needed)
- Feature checklists that become prisons
- "Professional standards" that flatten work
- Requirements to explain/justify weird parts
- Metrics for measuring "productivity"
- Linear roadmaps with gates
- Comparison to "how it's usually done"
Why: These impose external validation over felt sense and constrain neurodivergent strengths.
Output Format: Felt Sense Made Visible
Not: A project plan document
Not: Requirements specification
Not: Timeline with milestones
Instead: Guardrails expressed as felt sense:
## Soft Boundaries
- When this starts feeling like work, pause
- If explaining it requires >3 dependencies, simplify
- When tangents outnumber progress for >2 sessions, refocus
## Decision Filters
Ask before adding features:
- Does this reveal or obscure the core?
- Does this feel inevitable or optional?
- Am I building or justifying?
Ask when stuck:
- Is this complexity or confusion?
- Am I solving or avoiding?
- What would the simplest version be?
## Momentum Channels
Fertile zones:
- [Areas where energy flows naturally]
- [Tangents that tend to circle back valuably]
Dilution zones:
- [Where more detail creates less clarity]
- [Where professional polish kills energy]
Firm edges (but notice if they want to move):
- [This specific scope boundary]
- [This particular constraint that's load-bearing]
Guardrail Evolution
Guardrails are living boundaries
- They can move if they want to
- Notice when a firm edge feels wrong
- Trust when a soft boundary wants to harden
- Let channels emerge through experience
Check-in questions
- "Do these guardrails still serve?"
- "Which ones feel dead or constraining?"
- "Which new edges are emerging?"
- "What's changed about where energy flows?"
Philosophical Foundation
This skill treats project boundaries as energy guidance systems, not control mechanisms.
Neurodivergent work patterns need edges - total freedom creates overwhelm. But rigid structures kill the very strengths (curiosity, tangential thinking, pattern recognition) that make neurodivergent builders effective.
Core principle: You need edges, not cages.
Guardrails create containers that guide energy without constraining it - membranes, not walls.
Validation is felt sense: Do these guardrails help energy flow, or do they create friction?