| name | performance-correlation |
| description | Correlate content attributes with performance metrics across GA4, GSC, and SE Ranking. Identify what drives performance and build optimization hypotheses. |
Performance Correlation
When to Use
- Connecting content changes to metric changes
- Identifying what drives performance
- Building optimization hypotheses
- A/B test analysis
- Content audit findings
Cross-Source Correlation Patterns
Pattern Library
Pattern 1: High Impressions + Low CTR + Good Position
GSC: Impressions ↑ | CTR ↓ | Position 3-7
GA4: N/A (users don't click)
Diagnosis: Title/meta description not compelling enough
Evidence Needed:
- Compare your snippet to competitors in positions 1-2
- Check for SERP features stealing attention
- Analyze query intent match
Recommended Actions:
- Rewrite title with power words, numbers, or year
- Add compelling meta description with clear benefit
- Target featured snippet if applicable
Expected Impact: +50-100% CTR improvement possible
Pattern 2: High CTR + Low Engagement
GSC: CTR ↑ | Position stable
GA4: Bounce ↑ | Time on Page ↓ | Scroll Depth ↓
Diagnosis: Content doesn't match search intent or promise
Evidence Needed:
- Compare content to search query expectations
- Check if title oversells/misleads
- Analyze competing content that ranks
Recommended Actions:
- Align content opening with search intent
- Deliver promised value in first 100 words
- Add table of contents for scanners
Expected Impact: -20-30% bounce rate, +50% time on page
Pattern 3: High Engagement + Low Rankings
GA4: Time on Page ↑ | Bounce ↓ | Scroll Depth ↑
GSC: Position ↓ | Impressions ↓
SE Ranking: Visibility ↓
Diagnosis: Good content but weak SEO signals
Evidence Needed:
- Check backlink profile vs competitors
- Analyze internal linking to this page
- Review technical SEO factors
Recommended Actions:
- Build quality backlinks to page
- Add internal links from high-authority pages
- Improve on-page SEO (keyword density, headers)
Expected Impact: +5-15 position improvement over 2-3 months
Pattern 4: Declining Rankings + Stable Traffic
SE Ranking: Position ↓ | Visibility ↓
GSC: Impressions → | Clicks → (or slight ↓)
GA4: Traffic → (from brand/direct)
Diagnosis: Competitors advancing, brand queries protecting you
Evidence Needed:
- Competitor content comparison
- Content freshness analysis
- Backlink velocity comparison
Recommended Actions:
- Content refresh with updated data/examples
- Add new sections competitors have
- Accelerate link building
Expected Impact: Prevent further decline, regain positions
Pattern 5: Good Rankings + Low Impressions
SE Ranking: Position 1-5
GSC: Impressions ↓ | CTR normal
GA4: Traffic ↓
Diagnosis: Keyword losing search volume
Evidence Needed:
- Google Trends for keyword
- Seasonal patterns analysis
- Industry shifts
Recommended Actions:
- Target related growing keywords
- Expand content for related queries
- Consider pivoting topic angle
Expected Impact: Capture adjacent search demand
Pattern 6: Position Volatility
GSC: Position fluctuates ±10 daily
SE Ranking: Inconsistent ranking reports
Diagnosis: Google testing your content, or thin content threshold
Evidence Needed:
- Content depth vs competitors
- E-E-A-T signals present
- Page experience metrics
Recommended Actions:
- Strengthen E-E-A-T signals
- Add depth and originality
- Improve page experience
Expected Impact: Position stabilization within 2-4 weeks
Correlation Matrix Template
Content Changes Timeline
Track all modifications to correlate with metrics:
## Content Change Log: {URL}
| Date | Change Type | Description | Scope |
|------|-------------|-------------|-------|
| 2025-12-01 | Content | Added 500 words on AI SEO | Major |
| 2025-12-10 | Meta | Updated title tag | Minor |
| 2025-12-15 | Links | Added 3 internal links | Minor |
| 2025-12-20 | Technical | Improved page speed | Technical |
Metric Response Timeline
Map metric changes to content changes:
## Metric Response Analysis
| Date | Metric | Before | After | Change | Likely Cause |
|------|--------|--------|-------|--------|--------------|
| Dec 5 | Position | 8.2 | 6.1 | +2.1 | Content expansion |
| Dec 12 | CTR | 2.1% | 3.8% | +1.7pp | Title update |
| Dec 18 | Time on Page | 2:10 | 3:45 | +1:35 | Content depth |
| Dec 22 | LCP | 2.8s | 1.9s | -0.9s | Speed optimization |
Correlation Confidence
Rate confidence in cause-effect relationships:
## Correlation Confidence Assessment
| Change | Metric Impact | Confidence | Reasoning |
|--------|---------------|------------|-----------|
| +500 words | Position +2.1 | HIGH | Timing matches, logical connection |
| Title update | CTR +1.7pp | HIGH | Direct relationship, immediate effect |
| Internal links | ? | LOW | Too recent, effect delayed |
| Speed fix | Bounce -5% | MEDIUM | Timing matches, indirect relationship |
Multi-Source Correlation
Unified Performance View
## Cross-Platform Correlation: {URL}
### Traffic & Visibility
| Source | Metric | Value | Trend | Correlation |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|-------------|
| GSC | Impressions | 15,200 | ↑ +12% | Search visibility growing |
| GSC | Clicks | 428 | ↑ +8% | Traffic following visibility |
| GA4 | Sessions | 512 | ↑ +10% | Confirms GSC data |
| SE Ranking | Visibility | 42 | ↑ +5 | Ranking improvements |
### Engagement Quality
| Source | Metric | Value | Trend | Correlation |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|-------------|
| GSC | CTR | 2.8% | → stable | Snippet unchanged |
| GA4 | Bounce Rate | 38% | ↓ -4% | Content improvements working |
| GA4 | Avg Time | 3:42 | ↑ +0:45 | Users more engaged |
| GA4 | Scroll Depth | 72% | ↑ +8% | Content structure improved |
### Ranking Performance
| Source | Keyword | Position | Change | Opportunity |
|--------|---------|----------|--------|-------------|
| SE Ranking | seo guide | 4 | +2 | Target position 1-3 |
| SE Ranking | seo best practices | 7 | +1 | Content gap vs leader |
| GSC | seo tips 2025 | 12 | -3 | Needs freshness update |
Hypothesis Building
Template
## Optimization Hypothesis
**Observation**: {what the data shows}
**Hypothesis**: {proposed cause-effect relationship}
**Test Plan**:
1. {specific change to make}
2. {metrics to monitor}
3. {timeframe for evaluation}
**Success Criteria**:
- Primary: {main metric target}
- Secondary: {supporting metric targets}
**Risk Assessment**:
- Probability of success: {HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW}
- Potential downside: {risk description}
- Mitigation: {how to minimize risk}
Example Hypothesis
## Optimization Hypothesis: CTR Improvement
**Observation**: Page ranks #4 for "seo guide 2025" with 15K monthly
impressions but only 2.8% CTR (below 5% benchmark).
**Hypothesis**: Updating title to include "Complete" and current year
will increase CTR by appealing to users seeking comprehensive, fresh content.
**Test Plan**:
1. Change title from "SEO Guide: Tips for Success" to
"Complete SEO Guide 2025: 15 Proven Strategies"
2. Monitor: CTR, impressions, position, clicks
3. Evaluate after 2 weeks of data
**Success Criteria**:
- Primary: CTR increases from 2.8% to >4%
- Secondary: Clicks increase by >30%
- Position maintains or improves
**Risk Assessment**:
- Probability of success: HIGH (title changes typically show results)
- Potential downside: Slight position fluctuation during testing
- Mitigation: Don't change other page elements simultaneously