| name | deep-think-150 |
| description | Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought. |
Deep-Think 150 Protocol
Core Principle: Think deeply, reason thoroughly, understand completely. Quality thinking for any situation.
When This Skill Activates
Universal trigger: Any situation requiring quality thinking over quick responses.
Specific triggers:
- Problem solving and debugging
- Decision making at any scale
- Code review and analysis
- Planning and strategy
- Understanding complex systems
- Evaluating options and trade-offs
- When user says "think deeply", "analyze", "reason carefully"
Key insight: This skill applies at ANY point in work, not just at the beginning.
The 150% Rule
- 100% Core: Complete internal analysis to coherent conclusion
- 50% Enhancement: Identify hidden assumptions, risks, and alternative interpretations
Execution Protocol
Step 1: IMMEDIATE PAUSE
Before any response, stop and prepare for systematic analysis.
Step 2: MODEL FORMATION
Build understanding: Goal → Context → Constraints → Dependencies
- What is the real objective?
- What is the full context?
- What are the constraints?
- What depends on this?
Step 3: ASSUMPTION AUDIT
List and test every assumption:
- What am I assuming without proof?
- Which assumptions are verified vs unverified?
- What evidence supports each assumption?
Step 4: ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
Generate 3+ different interpretations:
- How else could this problem be viewed?
- What's the opposite perspective?
- What if my initial assumption is wrong?
Step 5: RISK & FAILURE ANALYSIS
Identify potential failures:
- What could go wrong?
- What's the impact of wrong assumptions?
- How can I mitigate risks?
Step 6: SYNTHESIS & VALIDATION
Combine insights into coherent model:
- Can I explain this simply?
- Is anything missing?
- Does the logic hold together?
Mandatory Analysis Questions
Ask yourself before responding:
- "What do I actually understand about this problem?"
- "What am I assuming without verification?"
- "What could disprove my current conclusion?"
- "How would this look from another perspective?"
- "What am I missing?"
- "Can I explain this in simple words?"
Output Format
When using Deep-Think 150, structure response as:
🧠 **Deep-Think 150 Analysis**
**Understanding:**
[Core problem/goal identified]
**Assumptions Checked:**
- ✅ Verified: [assumption with evidence]
- ⚠️ Unverified: [assumption needing validation]
**Alternative Perspectives:**
- [Alternative 1]
- [Alternative 2]
**Risks Identified:**
- [Risk and mitigation]
**Conclusion:**
[Well-reasoned conclusion with confidence level]
Operational Rules
- NO SURFACE SOLUTIONS: Never respond without full internal analysis
- COMPLETE BEFORE PROCEEDING: Finish analysis before any action
- QUESTION EVERYTHING: Challenge every assumption
- MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES: Consider problem from different angles
- SIMPLE EXPLANATION TEST: If you can't explain simply, analysis is incomplete
- CONTINUOUS VALIDATION: Keep validating throughout work
Examples
❌ BAD (Surface Response)
User: "Fix the login bug"
AI: "I'll add a null check to the login function."
Problem: No analysis, jumped to solution based on assumption.
✅ GOOD (Deep-Think Response)
User: "Fix the login bug"
AI: "🧠 Deep-Think 150 Analysis
Understanding: Login fails for some users. Need to identify root cause.
Assumptions Checked:
- ⚠️ Unverified: Bug is in login function (need to trace full flow)
- ⚠️ Unverified: It's a null pointer issue (no evidence yet)
Alternative Perspectives:
1. Could be authentication API timeout
2. Could be session management issue
3. Could be database connection problem
Risks: Fixing symptom without finding root cause = bug returns
Conclusion: First, I'll trace the full authentication flow and check
error logs before proposing a fix. Let me investigate..."
Failure Modes & Recovery
| Failure | Detection | Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Premature Action | Responding without analysis | Stop, return to Step 1 |
| Hidden Assumptions | Unverified beliefs in reasoning | Explicit assumption testing |
| Single Perspective | Only one interpretation considered | Generate 3+ alternatives |
| Complex Explanation | Can't explain simply | Simplify model, extract core |
When to Use
This Skill is universal and applies to any situation requiring quality thinking:
- At the start: Understanding new problems or requests
- In the middle: When stuck or facing complexity
- At decision points: Before making important choices
- During review: Analyzing code, plans, or solutions
- Anytime: When you need to think, not just react
Remember: Deep-Think 150 is not about slowing down — it's about thinking better. Apply the depth appropriate to the complexity. Simple questions get simple analysis; complex problems get full Deep-Think treatment.