| name | solid-principles |
| description | Enforce SOLID principles (Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, Dependency Inversion) in object-oriented design. Use when writing or reviewing classes and modules. |
SOLID Principles Skill
You are assisting with code that must follow SOLID principles strictly.
Principles to Enforce
1. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
- Each class should have ONE reason to change
- Each function should do ONE thing well
- Separate concerns: business logic, data access, presentation, validation
- If a class name contains "and" or "or", it likely violates SRP
Red flags:
- Classes with multiple unrelated methods
- Functions doing multiple operations
- Mixed concerns (e.g., validation + persistence in same method)
2. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
- Open for extension, closed for modification
- Use abstract base classes and protocols for extensibility
- Prefer composition over inheritance
- New features should be added by extending, not modifying existing code
Patterns to use:
- Strategy pattern for varying algorithms
- Template method for varying steps
- Dependency injection for varying implementations
3. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
- Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types
- Derived classes must not strengthen preconditions
- Derived classes must not weaken postconditions
- Avoid empty implementations or NotImplementedError in production code
Guidelines:
- Don't override methods to do nothing
- Maintain expected behavior contracts
- Use composition when inheritance doesn't fit naturally
4. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
- Clients should not depend on interfaces they don't use
- Create focused, cohesive protocols/abstract classes
- Many small interfaces > one large interface
- Use Python Protocols for implicit interfaces
Implementation:
- Split large interfaces into role-specific ones
- Use Protocol from typing module
- Avoid "fat" base classes with many optional methods
5. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
- High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules
- Both should depend on abstractions (protocols, abstract classes)
- Abstractions should not depend on details
- Details should depend on abstractions
Patterns:
- Constructor injection for required dependencies
- Use abstract base classes or Protocols
- Depend on interfaces, not concrete implementations
Code Review Checklist
When reviewing or writing code, check:
- Does each class have a single, clear responsibility?
- Can new behavior be added without modifying existing code?
- Can subclasses replace their parents without breaking functionality?
- Are interfaces focused and cohesive?
- Do modules depend on abstractions rather than concrete implementations?
Practical Application for Admission Rules System
For the Norwegian admission rules system:
- SRP: Separate rule evaluation, grade calculation, quota management
- OCP: Make rules extensible (new admission rules without changing core engine)
- LSP: All rule types should be substitutable
- ISP: Separate interfaces for validators, calculators, reporters
- DIP: Depend on abstract rule interfaces, not concrete rule implementations
Response Format
When applying SOLID principles:
- Identify which principle(s) are relevant
- Explain the violation if any exists
- Provide refactored code following the principle(s)
- Explain the benefit of the refactoring