| name | stakeholder-discovery-template |
| description | Generic stakeholder discovery template for creating new project-specific stakeholder skills. Auto-invoke when user requests stakeholder skill creation, stakeholder analysis framework, or team context templates. Do NOT load during actual stakeholder discussions (use project-specific skills instead). |
| allowed-tools | Grep |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | Templates |
| tags | template, stakeholder-discovery, skill-creation |
| last-updated | Sun Oct 19 2025 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) |
Stakeholder Discovery Template
Purpose
This template guides the creation of project-specific stakeholder skills. Replace all [PLACEHOLDER] values with actual project information.
SKILL.md Frontmatter Template
---
name: [project]-[domain]-stakeholders
description: Stakeholder context for [PROJECT_NAME] [DOMAIN] when discussing [USE_CASE_1], [USE_CASE_2], or [USE_CASE_3]. Auto-invoke when user mentions [PROJECT_TRIGGER], [DOMAIN_TRIGGER], or [TEAM_TRIGGER]. Do NOT load for general [DOMAIN] discussions unrelated to [PROJECT_NAME].
allowed-tools: []
version: 1.0.0
category: Stakeholders
tags: [[project], [domain], [key-theme-1], [key-theme-2]]
last-updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
---
Description Engineering Guidance:
✅ DO include specific trigger terms:
- Project name (exact capitalization users will mention)
- Domain keywords (fintech, UX research, payment processing)
- Team names users will reference
❌ DON'T use generic descriptions:
- "Provides stakeholder information" (too broad)
- "Use when discussing stakeholders" (will load too often)
- No explicit project scope (will contaminate other projects)
Example Good Description:
Stakeholder context for Phoenix UX research project when discussing user testing, research synthesis, or design validation. Auto-invoke when user mentions Phoenix, UX research stakeholders, or design team collaboration. Do NOT load for general UX discussions unrelated to Phoenix.
Skill Content Structure Template
[TEAM_NAME] Team
Team Objectives
[PRIMARY_OBJECTIVE_1](quantified if possible: >95% accuracy, <100ms latency)[PRIMARY_OBJECTIVE_2][PRIMARY_OBJECTIVE_3]
Key Stakeholders
[ROLE_TITLE] (Use role, not individual name - NO PII)
- Decision Authority:
[SPECIFIC_DECISIONS_THIS_ROLE_MAKES] - Communication Preference:
[PREFERRED_CHANNELS_AND_STYLE]- Examples: "Data-driven with A/B test results", "Formal written proposals", "Technical RFCs with diagrams"
- Success Metrics:
[QUANTIFIABLE_METRICS_THIS_ROLE_CARES_ABOUT]- Format: "[Metric name] [operator][value]" (e.g., "Fraud detection rate >95%")
- Pain Points:
[CURRENT_CHALLENGE_1](quantified if possible)[CURRENT_CHALLENGE_2][CURRENT_CHALLENGE_3]
Decision-Making Patterns
[DECISION_TYPE]:[APPROVAL_PROCESS_AND_CRITERIA]- Example: "Rule Changes: Requires statistical significance (p<0.05) with 2-week A/B test"
- Review Cycle:
[FREQUENCY_AND_FORMAT]- Example: "Weekly sprint reviews for non-critical updates"
- Escalation Protocols:
[WHEN_AND_HOW_TO_ESCALATE]- Example: "Emergency fraud spike triggers immediate team call"
- Approval Chain:
[ROLE_1]→[ROLE_2]→[ROLE_3](for[DECISION_SCOPE])
Communication Channels (Optional)
- Primary:
[SLACK_CHANNEL_OR_EMAIL_GROUP] - Meetings:
[RECURRING_MEETING_SCHEDULE] - Documentation:
[CONFLUENCE_WIKI_OR_DOC_LOCATION] - Escalations:
[EMERGENCY_CONTACT_METHOD](NO personal phone numbers)
Validation Checklist
Before finalizing skill, verify:
Content Quality:
- All
[PLACEHOLDERS]replaced with actual values - Zero PII (no names, emails, phone numbers, personal identifiers)
- Zero business-confidential metrics (use relative: ">95%" not "$5M revenue")
- Quantified metrics where possible (not "high accuracy", say ">95%")
Description Engineering:
- Description includes specific WHEN triggers (project name, domain keywords)
- Description includes explicit WHEN NOT boundaries
- Tested with positive queries (should load):
[LIST_TEST_QUERIES] - Tested with negative queries (should NOT load):
[LIST_TEST_QUERIES]
Metadata & Tracking:
- Ground truth source documented with date
- Validation date included
- Next review date specified (recommend quarterly)
-
allowed-tools: []set (stakeholder skills are read-only reference) - Category and tags aid discovery
Security & Scope:
- File location matches scope (project skills in
.claude/skills/projects/[name]/) - No personal preferences mixed with stakeholder context
- Reviewed by at least one other team member (if team skill)
Usage Examples
Creating New Stakeholder Skill:
User: "Create a stakeholder skill for the Phoenix UX research team"
Claude: [Loads this template skill, uses structure to create Phoenix-specific skill]
Finding Template for Reference:
User: "What's the standard format for stakeholder skills?"
Claude: [Loads this template skill, shows structure and best practices]
Do NOT Use This Template For:
- Actual stakeholder discussions (use project-specific skills instead)
- Ground truth documentation (use ground-truth template)
- Product context (use product skill template)
Template Source: Research report + eval committee consensus Template Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-10-19 Validation: Ready for Week 1 PoC testing