Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Use when refining an architecture or design document based on new learnings, before a rewrite. Use when you have an existing doc and related docs to cross-check against. Use when you need systematic section-by-section validation of decisions.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name design-review
description Use when refining an architecture or design document based on new learnings, before a rewrite. Use when you have an existing doc and related docs to cross-check against. Use when you need systematic section-by-section validation of decisions.

Design Review

Overview

Design review separates validation from rewriting. Go section-by-section through a design doc, cross-check against new learnings, record changes with rationale, then rewrite in a fresh session.

Core principle: Changes document first, rewrite second. Never edit inline.

When to Use

  • Refining v1 → v2 of an architecture doc
  • Incorporating implementation learnings into design
  • Cross-checking design against related docs
  • Validating past decisions after new context

Don't use: Writing from scratch (use brainstorming), minor edits, obvious changes.

Process

1. Create Changes Document

# [Design Name] v[N+1]: Changes
> After full review, create fresh v[N+1] incorporating all changes.
## Changes

2. Section-by-Section Review

For each section:

  1. Summarize current state
  2. Cross-check against new learnings
  3. Ask clarifying questions
  4. Record change or confirm unchanged

Questions to ask:

  • Does this still hold given what we now know?
  • Anything missing? Contradicts other sections?
  • Right level of detail for this doc?

3. Change Format

### [N]. [Short Description]
**Section:** [Section name]
**Change:** [What's changing]
**Rationale:** [Why]
---

4. Structural Principles

Principle Meaning
Main body vs Appendix "What we're doing" vs "paths we rejected"
No mixed content Remove sections with undiscussed details mixed in
Feature sections own data Each feature owns its endpoints/models, no central lists
No timelines Architecture = what, not when

5. Fresh Session Rewrite

Do NOT rewrite in same session. Start fresh with:

  • Original design doc
  • Changes document
  • Related docs (reference)

Red Flags

  • "I'll just fix this inline" → Use changes document
  • "This section looks fine" → Confirm aloud or mark unchanged
  • "I'll remember why" → Write rationale now
  • "Let me rewrite now" → Fresh session required
  • "Auto-generated but reasonable" → Validate or remove

Common Mistakes

Mistake Fix
Inline editing Always use changes document
Skipping sections Review every section
No rationale Always include "why"
Same-session rewrite Fresh session for rewrite
Keeping auto-generated details Validate each or remove