| name | versioning-constitutions |
| description | Use when architectural patterns evolve, tech stack changes, or foundational rules need updates - creates new constitution version directory, migrates/organizes content into modular files, updates symlink, and documents changes |
Versioning Constitutions
Core Principle
Constitution versions are immutable snapshots of architectural truth.
When foundational rules change (patterns, tech stack, architecture), create a new version rather than editing in place. This preserves history, enables rollback, and makes changes explicit.
When to Use This Skill
ALWAYS create a new version when:
- Adding a new mandatory pattern (e.g., adopting effect-ts for error handling)
- Removing OR relaxing a mandatory pattern (e.g., making next-safe-action optional)
- Changing tech stack (e.g., migrating from Prisma to Drizzle)
- Updating architectural boundaries (e.g., adding new layer)
- Deprecating rules that are no longer valid
- Major library version changes with breaking patterns (e.g., Next.js 15 → 16)
CRITICAL: Removing or relaxing a mandatory pattern ALWAYS requires a new version, even if existing code would still work. "Non-breaking" is not sufficient - any change to mandatory patterns needs versioning for audit trail.
Do NOT use for:
- Fixing typos or clarifying existing rules (edit current version directly)
- Adding examples to existing patterns (edit current version directly)
- Project-specific implementation details (those go in specs/)
Test for Constitutionality:
Before adding content to constitution, ask: "If we violate this rule, does the architecture break?"
- ✅ Constitutional: "Must use next-safe-action" → violating breaks type safety & validation
- ❌ Not constitutional: "Forms should have wrapper, fields, button" → violating just looks different
Constitution = Architectural rules. Specs = Implementation patterns.
Process
Step 1: Determine Version Number
Read docs/constitutions/current/meta.md to get current version.
Version increment rules:
- Increment by 1 (v1 → v2, v2 → v3)
- No semantic versioning (major.minor.patch)
- Sequential only
Step 2: Create New Version Directory
# Create new version directory
mkdir -p docs/constitutions/v{N}
# Copy structure from current
cp docs/constitutions/current/*.md docs/constitutions/v{N}/
Step 3: Update Content
Edit files in new version directory with changes:
meta.md- Update version number, date, changelogarchitecture.md- Update if architectural boundaries changedpatterns.md- Update if mandatory patterns changedtech-stack.md- Update if libraries added/removedschema-rules.md- Update if database philosophy changedtesting.md- Update if testing requirements changed
Critical - Minimal Changes Only:
- Only change what NEEDS changing for this version
- NO reorganizing sections ("while I'm here")
- NO reformatting code examples
- NO alphabetizing lists
- NO renaming headings for style
- NO creating new categories unless absolutely required
The diff should show ONLY the substantive change, not stylistic improvements.
Step 4: Update Symlink
# Remove old symlink
rm docs/constitutions/current
# Create new symlink pointing to new version
ln -s v{N} docs/constitutions/current
Step 5: Verify References
Check that all references still work:
# Find all references to constitutions
grep -r "@docs/constitutions/current" .claude/
grep -r "docs/constitutions/current" .claude/
All references should use current/ symlink, never hardcoded versions.
Step 6: Document in meta.md
MANDATORY: Update meta.md with complete documentation:
- New version number (e.g., "Version: 2")
- Creation date (e.g., "Created: 2025-01-17")
- Previous version reference (e.g., "Previous: v1")
- Summary of WHAT changed (e.g., "Removed Redux prohibition")
- Rationale for WHY (e.g., "React Server Components handle all state needs, Redux adds complexity without benefit")
The WHY is critical. In 6 months, the context will be lost. Document:
- What problem does this change solve?
- What decision or discussion led to this?
- Why now vs earlier/later?
DO NOT rely on git commit messages or external docs. meta.md must be self-contained.
Quality Checklist
Before updating symlink:
- New version directory exists at
docs/constitutions/v{N}/ - All 6 files present (meta, architecture, patterns, tech-stack, schema-rules, testing)
-
meta.mdhas correct version number and changelog - Changes documented with rationale (why, not just what)
- Old version remains untouched (immutable)
- References in commands use
current/notv{N}/
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Editing Current Version for Breaking Changes
Wrong: Edit docs/constitutions/current/patterns.md directly when removing next-safe-action requirement
Right: Create v2, update patterns.md in v2, update symlink
Why: Breaking changes need versioning. Commands/specs may reference old patterns.
Mistake 2: Hardcoding Version in References
Wrong: @docs/constitutions/v2/architecture.md
Right: @docs/constitutions/current/architecture.md
Why: When v3 is created, all references break. Symlink abstracts version.
Mistake 3: Reorganizing for Style
Wrong: "Let me alphabetize sections and rename files while versioning"
Right: Only change content that needs substantive updates
Why: Gratuitous changes obscure what actually changed. Diff should show real changes.
Mistake 4: Forgetting to Update meta.md
Wrong: Copy files, update content, update symlink, done
Right: Update meta.md with version, date, and changelog
Why: Future you won't remember why version changed. Document the why.
Mistake 5: Versioning Implementation Details
Wrong: Create v2 because we changed button component structure
Right: Constitution = foundational rules only. Implementation goes in specs/
Why: Constitution is for patterns/architecture/stack, not implementation choices.
Mistake 6: Rationalizing In-Place Edits
Wrong: "This change is non-breaking, so I can edit v1 in-place per the meta.md guidance"
Right: Removing/relaxing ANY mandatory pattern requires versioning, even if "non-breaking"
Why: Audit trail matters more than technical breaking changes. Future readers need to know WHEN rules changed, not just that they did. Git history is not sufficient - constitution versions create explicit snapshots.
Quick Reference
# Check current version
cat docs/constitutions/current/meta.md
# Create new version
mkdir -p docs/constitutions/v{N}
cp docs/constitutions/current/*.md docs/constitutions/v{N}/
# Edit content
# Update meta.md, then other files as needed
# Update symlink
rm docs/constitutions/current
ln -s v{N} docs/constitutions/current
# Verify
ls -la docs/constitutions/current
grep -r "constitutions/v[0-9]" .claude/ # Should return nothing
Example: Adding New Pattern
Scenario: We're adopting effect-ts for error handling and deprecating throw/catch.
Step 1: Current version is v1 (read meta.md)
Step 2: Create v2
mkdir -p docs/constitutions/v2
cp docs/constitutions/current/*.md docs/constitutions/v2/
Step 3: Update content
meta.md: Version 2, date, "Added effect-ts error handling pattern"patterns.md: Add new section on Effect error handlingtech-stack.md: Add effect-ts to approved libraries- Leave other files unchanged
Step 4: Update symlink
rm docs/constitutions/current
ln -s v2 docs/constitutions/current
Step 5: Verify references (should all use current/)
Step 6: meta.md documents why (type-safe error handling, eliminate throw)
Testing This Skill
See test-scenarios.md for pressure scenarios and RED-GREEN-REFACTOR tests.