| name | verification |
| description | MUST invoke before claiming work is complete, fixed, or passing. |
Verification Before Completion
Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
The Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate Function
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- ANY wording implying success without having run verification
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence != evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter != compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion != excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Key Patterns
Tests:
OK: [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
BAD: "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
OK: Write -> Run (pass) -> Revert fix -> Run (MUST FAIL) -> Restore -> Run (pass)
BAD: "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
OK: [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
BAD: "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
OK: Re-read plan -> Create checklist -> Verify each -> Report gaps or completion
BAD: "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
OK: Agent reports success -> Check VCS diff -> Verify changes -> Report actual state
BAD: Trust agent report
Why This Matters
From past failures:
- User said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion -> redirect -> rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."
When To Apply
ALWAYS before:
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
Rule applies to:
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
Preserving Evidence
What to preserve: Test output, build logs, command output, screenshots of UI states.
Where to save:
- Commit messages - include key metrics (e.g., "34/34 tests pass")
- PR descriptions - summarize verification results
.harness/docs - detailed logs for complex verifications
Retention: Keep until PR merged, minimum. Complex changes: keep longer.
Why: Supports "evidence over claims" - reviewers can verify your verification.
When Verification Fails
Immediate actions:
- STOP - don't push, don't commit
- Preserve evidence (copy error output, save state)
- Don't claim partial success
Rollback options:
git reset --soft HEAD~1- undo commit, keep changes stagedgit revert <sha>- create reverting commit (safe for pushed code)- Feature flags - disable broken feature without code rollback
Rollback vs fix forward:
- Rollback: broken in production, unclear cause, complex fix needed
- Fix forward: simple fix, cause is obvious, not yet deployed
Post-failure checklist:
- Document what failed and why
- Add systemic issues to backlog
- Update tests to catch this failure mode
Finishing Work
After verification passes, present completion options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Option Handling
Option 1: Merge Locally
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
<run tests again> # verify merged result
git branch -d <feature-branch>
Option 2: Push and Create PR
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "## Summary
<bullets>
## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>"
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch
Option 4: Discard Require typed confirmation: "Type 'discard' to confirm."
git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Branch |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge locally | Yes | - | Delete |
| 2. Create PR | - | Yes | Keep |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | Keep |
| 4. Discard | - | - | Force delete |
The Bottom Line
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.