| name | architecture-paradigm-pipeline |
| description | Compose processing stages using a pipes-and-filters model for ETL, media processing, or compiler-like workloads. Use when building data processing or transformation pipelines. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | architectural-pattern |
| tags | architecture, pipeline, pipes-filters, ETL, streaming, data-processing |
| dependencies | |
| tools | stream-processor, message-queue, data-validator |
| usage_patterns | paradigm-implementation, data-transformation, workflow-automation |
| complexity | medium |
| estimated_tokens | 700 |
The Pipeline (Pipes and Filters) Paradigm
When to Employ This Paradigm
- When data must flow through a fixed sequence of discrete transformations, such as in ETL jobs, streaming analytics, or CI/CD pipelines.
- When reusing individual processing stages is needed, either independently or to scale bottleneck stages separately from others.
- When failure isolation between stages is a critical requirement.
Adoption Steps
- Define Filters: Design each stage (filter) to perform a single, well-defined transformation. Each filter must have a clear input and output data schema.
- Connect via Pipes: Connect the filters using "pipes," which can be implemented as streams, message queues, or in-memory channels. Ensure these pipes support back-pressure and buffering.
- Maintain Stateless Filters: Where possible, design filters to be stateless. Any required state should be persisted externally or managed at the boundaries of the pipeline.
- Instrument Each Stage: Implement monitoring for each filter to track key metrics such as latency, throughput, and error rates.
- Orchestrate Deployments: Design the deployment strategy to allow each stage to be scaled horizontally and upgraded independently.
Key Deliverables
- An Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting the filters, the chosen pipe technology, the error-handling strategy, and the tools for replaying data.
- A suite of contract tests for each filter, plus integration tests that cover representative end-to-end pipeline executions.
- Observability dashboards that visualize stage-level Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
Risks & Mitigations
- Single-Stage Bottlenecks:
- Mitigation: Implement auto-scaling for individual filters. If a single filter remains a bottleneck, consider refactoring it into a more granular sub-pipeline.
- Schema Drift Between Stages:
- Mitigation: Centralize schema definitions in a shared repository and enforce compatibility tests as part of the CI/CD process to prevent breaking changes.
- Back-Pressure Failures:
- Mitigation: Conduct rigorous load testing to simulate high-volume scenarios. Validate that buffering, retry logic, and back-pressure mechanisms behave as expected under stress.