Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback
8
0

A guide to formatting review deliverables for consistency, ensuring findings are comparable across different types of analysis.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name structured-output
description A guide to formatting review deliverables for consistency, ensuring findings are comparable across different types of analysis.
category output-patterns
tags formatting, deliverables, consistency, reporting, structure
dependencies imbue:evidence-logging
tools
usage_patterns deliverable-formatting, report-structure, consistent-output
complexity beginner
estimated_tokens 1000

Structured Output

When to Use

  • When finalizing any review or analysis.
  • To format findings in a consistent and actionable way.
  • Before presenting results to stakeholders or committing them to documentation.

Activation Patterns

Trigger Keywords: format, structure, deliverable, report, organize, present, consistent Contextual Cues:

  • "format this as a report" or "structure the output"
  • "create a deliverable" or "present these findings"
  • "organize this consistently" or "standardize the format"
  • "make this actionable" or "prepare for stakeholders"

Auto-Load When: Finalizing any analysis deliverable or when consistent formatting is requested.

Required TodoWrite Items

  1. structured-output:template-selected
  2. structured-output:findings-formatted
  3. structured-output:actions-assigned
  4. structured-output:appendix-attached

Mark each item complete as you finish the corresponding step.

Step 1: Select Template (structured-output:template-selected)

  • Choose output format based on deliverable type:
    • Review Report: Summary, Findings, Recommendations, Evidence.
    • PR Description: Summary, Changes, Test Plan, Notes.
    • Release Notes: Highlights, Breaking Changes, Fixes, Credits.
    • Incident Report: Timeline, Impact, Root Cause, Remediation.
  • Confirm audience and required detail level.

Step 2: Format Findings (structured-output:findings-formatted)

  • Use consistent finding structure:
    ### [SEVERITY] Finding Title
    **Location**: file.rs:123
    **Category**: Security | Performance | Correctness | Style
    **Description**: Brief explanation of the issue.
    **Evidence**: [E1, E2] - Reference to evidence log.
    **Recommendation**: Specific remediation steps.
    
  • Severity levels: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO.
  • Order findings by severity, then by file location.

Step 3: Assign Actions (structured-output:actions-assigned)

  • Convert findings to actionable items:
    ## Action Items
    - [ ] [HIGH] Fix SQL injection in auth.py:45 (@security-team, P1)
    - [ ] [MEDIUM] Add input validation to API endpoint (@backend, P2)
    - [ ] [LOW] Update deprecated dependency (@devops, P3)
    
  • Include owner assignment where known.
  • Add priority indicators (P1/P2/P3) for triage.
  • Note dependencies between actions.

Step 4: Attach Appendix (structured-output:appendix-attached)

  • Compile supporting materials:
    ## Appendix
    ### A. Commands Run
    [Full evidence log from imbue:evidence-logging]
    
    ### B. External References
    [Citations and documentation links]
    
    ### C. Raw Data
    [Large outputs, full diffs, or data exports]
    
  • Keep main report concise; details in appendix.
  • Ensure appendix is navigable with clear section headers.

Output Quality Checklist

Before finalizing:

  • All findings have evidence references.
  • Severity levels are justified.
  • Recommendations are specific and actionable.
  • No orphaned sections or placeholder text.
  • Format renders correctly in target medium (GitHub, Confluence, etc.).

Exit Criteria

  • Todos completed with formatted deliverable.
  • Output follows selected template structure.
  • Stakeholders can act on findings without clarification.