Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

This skill should be used when building MVPs, proofs-of-concept, or products within tight timelines (6-day cycles) - optimizes for speed while maintaining quality through strategic decisions about building vs using pre-built components, scope management, and quality gates that don't slow momentum.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name rapid-prototyping
description This skill should be used when building MVPs, proofs-of-concept, or products within tight timelines (6-day cycles) - optimizes for speed while maintaining quality through strategic decisions about building vs using pre-built components, scope management, and quality gates that don't slow momentum.

Rapid Prototyping

Overview

Build functional products fast without sacrificing quality. This skill teaches systematic approaches to rapid development cycles, helping ship working software in days, not weeks.

Core principle: Speed comes from smart decisions about what NOT to build, not from cutting corners.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Building MVPs or proofs-of-concept
  • Working within 6-day development cycles
  • Need to validate ideas quickly
  • Prototyping before committing to full build
  • Converting rough concepts into working software
  • Time pressure requires strategic scope decisions

Don't use for:

  • Mature products with established codebases
  • Projects where performance/scale is primary concern
  • Compliance-heavy or highly regulated domains (unless prototyping approach)

The Rapid Prototyping Framework

Phase 1: Ruthless Scoping (30 minutes)

Goal: Define the absolute minimum to prove the concept

Build vs Buy vs Integrate Decision

For EACH feature, ask:

1. Can I use an existing block/template?
   YES → shadcnblocks.com (829 blocks), templates, boilerplate

2. Can I integrate a service instead of building?
   YES → Supabase (auth/db), Clerk (auth), Stripe (payments), etc.

3. Must I build custom?
   YES → Add to scope, but use frameworks/libraries
   NO → Stop. Don't build it.

The 3-Feature Rule

Core features only:

  1. Primary value proposition
  2. One delighter/differentiator
  3. Basic functionality to make #1 work

Everything else is post-MVP.

Scope Questions

  • "What's the ONE thing this has to do?"
  • "Can we fake this for now?" (Wizard of Oz testing)
  • "Will users care about this on day 1?"
  • "Can this be a manual process initially?"

Output: Clear list of 3-5 features max

Phase 2: Tech Stack Selection (15 minutes)

Proven fast stacks:

Frontend - Go-to Stack

Next.js 14+ (App Router)
+ TypeScript
+ Tailwind CSS
+ shadcn/ui (pre-built components)
+ shadcnblocks.com (829 ready sections)

Why: Hot reload, TypeScript safety, massive component library

Backend - Choose Based on Complexity

Simple (CRUD, auth, basic logic):

Supabase (Postgres + Auth + Realtime + Storage)
OR
Firebase (if real-time is critical)

Medium (custom business logic):

Next.js API Routes
OR
tRPC (type-safe APIs)

Complex (heavy processing, background jobs):

Node.js + Express/Fastify
OR
Python + FastAPI

Database Selection

Use Case Choose Why
Standard CRUD Supabase (Postgres) Managed, auth included, fast setup
Real-time data Firebase Firestore Native real-time, scales automatically
Document-heavy MongoDB Atlas Flexible schema, free tier
Analytics/reporting Postgres + Prisma Complex queries, data integrity

Authentication - Don't Build It

Provider Use When
Supabase Auth Already using Supabase
Clerk Need beautiful pre-built components
Auth0 Enterprise features needed
NextAuth.js Maximum customization required

Never build auth from scratch in rapid prototyping.

Phase 3: Component Strategy (ongoing)

shadcnblocks.com First

Before building ANY UI section, check shadcnblocks.com:

Hero section needed?
  → shadcnblocks.com/blocks/hero (162 options)
  → Copy, customize, done in 10 minutes

Pricing page?
  → shadcnblocks.com/blocks/pricing (35 options)
  → Copy, adjust numbers, done

Testimonials?
  → shadcnblocks.com/blocks/testimonial (28 options)
  → Copy, plug in quotes, done

Time saved: Hours → Minutes per section

shadcn/ui Component Pattern

// WRONG: Building from scratch
const MyButton = () => {
  // 50 lines of custom code
}

// RIGHT: Use shadcn/ui
import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button"

<Button variant="default">Click me</Button>
// Accessible, tested, done

The Component Decision Tree

Need UI component?
├─ Common pattern? (button, form, dialog, etc.)
│  └─ npx shadcn@latest add [component]
│
├─ Full section? (hero, pricing, features)
│  └─ shadcnblocks.com → copy → customize
│
└─ Truly unique?
   └─ Build with Tailwind + shadcn primitives

Phase 4: Quality Gates That Don't Slow You Down

Must-Have Quality (non-negotiable)

  • TypeScript - Catches bugs at compile time
  • Core user flow works - Happy path functional
  • Data persists - Not losing user work
  • Deploys successfully - Actually accessible

Can-Wait Quality (post-MVP)

  • Edge case handling - "What if user does X weird thing?"
  • Perfect responsive design - Desktop works, mobile "good enough"
  • Comprehensive error messages - Basic errors covered
  • Performance optimization - Fast enough, not perfect
  • Extensive testing - Happy path tested, edge cases later

The 80/20 Rule for Prototypes

Spend time on:

  • Core feature functionality (80% of value)
  • First-time user experience
  • Data that can't be faked

Don't spend time on:

  • Admin dashboards (build post-launch)
  • Analytics (add after validation)
  • Edge cases (handle when encountered)
  • Perfect UX (good UX is enough)

Phase 5: Development Velocity Patterns

Use Generators and Boilerplate

# Next.js with TypeScript, Tailwind, shadcn
npx create-next-app@latest my-app \
  --typescript --tailwind --app

cd my-app

# Initialize shadcn/ui
npx shadcn@latest init

# Add common components
npx shadcn@latest add button card dialog form input \
  toast table dropdown-menu

Time saved: 2 hours of configuration

API Development Pattern (Fast)

// app/api/items/route.ts
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from 'next/server'

export async function GET(request: NextRequest) {
  // Get from DB
  const items = await db.items.findMany()
  return NextResponse.json(items)
}

export async function POST(request: NextRequest) {
  const data = await request.json()
  // Validate with Zod
  // Save to DB
  const item = await db.items.create({ data })
  return NextResponse.json(item)
}

Speed trick: Start with Next.js API routes, move to separate backend only if needed

Database Pattern (Fast)

// Use Prisma for type-safe database access
// schema.prisma
model User {
  id        String   @id @default(cuid())
  email     String   @unique
  name      String?
  createdAt DateTime @default(now())
}

// Generate types + client
// npx prisma generate
// npx prisma db push

// Usage - fully typed!
const user = await prisma.user.create({
  data: { email, name }
})

Speed trick: Prisma generates TypeScript types from schema

Phase 6: Deployment Speed Runs

Fastest: Vercel (for Next.js)

# 1. Push to GitHub
git init && git add . && git commit -m "Initial"
gh repo create --public --push

# 2. Deploy via CLI
npm i -g vercel
vercel

# Done in <5 minutes

Fast: Fly.io (for any app)

# 1. Install flyctl
curl -L https://fly.io/install.sh | sh

# 2. Launch (creates fly.toml)
fly launch

# 3. Deploy
fly deploy

# Done in <10 minutes

Moderate: Hostinger VPS (for full control)

# Already have VPS access
ssh root@your-vps-ip

# Clone and run with docker-compose
git clone your-repo
cd your-repo
docker-compose up -d

# Done in <15 minutes (if docker-compose.yml ready)

Strategy: Start with Vercel/Fly.io for speed, move to VPS if needed

Common Rapid Prototyping Patterns

Pattern 1: The Landing Page MVP

Goal: Validate idea before building

Stack:

  • Next.js
  • shadcnblocks.com hero + features + pricing + CTA
  • Email capture (Supabase or simple API)
  • Deploy to Vercel

Time: 2-4 hours

Pattern 2: The CRUD Dashboard

Goal: Internal tool or simple SaaS

Stack:

  • Next.js + TypeScript
  • Supabase (auth + database + realtime)
  • shadcn/ui table + form + dialog components
  • Deploy to Vercel

Time: 1-2 days

Pattern 3: The AI-Powered Tool

Goal: Wrapper around AI API

Stack:

  • Next.js API routes
  • Claude API or OpenAI
  • shadcn/ui for interface
  • Supabase for data persistence
  • Deploy to Vercel

Time: 2-3 days

Pattern 4: The Mobile-First Web App

Goal: App-like experience

Stack:

  • Next.js PWA
  • Tailwind CSS (mobile-first)
  • shadcnblocks.com mobile-optimized blocks
  • Supabase for backend
  • Deploy to Vercel

Time: 3-4 days

Decision Frameworks

Build vs Integrate Decision Matrix

Feature Build If... Integrate If...
Authentication Never Always (Supabase/Clerk/Auth0)
Payments Unique flow required Standard checkout (Stripe)
Email sending Never Always (Resend/SendGrid)
File storage Never for MVP Always (Supabase Storage/S3)
Search Simple filter Complex (Algolia/Typesense)
Analytics Custom metrics needed Standard metrics (PostHog/Plausible)
Forms Custom validation Standard forms (Tally/Typeform)

Database Selection Matrix

Need Use Why
Relational data, complex queries Postgres (Supabase) ACID, joins, constraints
Real-time updates, collaborative Firebase/Supabase Built-in real-time
Document-based, flexible schema MongoDB Rapid schema evolution
Time-series data TimescaleDB/InfluxDB Optimized for time data
Graph relationships Neo4j (later) Start with Postgres

When to Stop Prototyping and Rebuild

Stop and rebuild when:

  • Technical debt blocking new features
  • Performance issues affecting UX
  • Security concerns for production
  • Scaling becomes expensive/impossible
  • Code is "unfixable" due to hacks

Keep iterating when:

  • Users are happy with core functionality
  • Performance is "good enough"
  • You can add features without major refactoring
  • Deployment is still easy

Speed Killers to Avoid

1. Perfect Design Before Code

Slow: Design every screen in Figma before coding ✅ Fast: Use shadcnblocks.com + customize as you code

2. Custom Authentication

Slow: Build auth from scratch (1-2 weeks) ✅ Fast: Supabase Auth or Clerk (1-2 hours)

3. Over-Engineering Database

Slow: Perfect normalized schema upfront ✅ Fast: Start simple, refactor when needed

4. Premature Optimization

Slow: Optimize before knowing bottlenecks ✅ Fast: Build, measure, then optimize

5. Building Admin Tools Early

Slow: Admin dashboard before user-facing features ✅ Fast: Use database GUI, build admin later

6. Custom Components for Everything

Slow: Build every button, form, modal from scratch ✅ Fast: shadcn/ui + customize as needed

Quality Checklist for Prototypes

Before showing to users:

  • Core user flow works end-to-end
  • Data persists correctly
  • Basic error handling (doesn't crash)
  • TypeScript compiles without errors
  • Deploys successfully
  • Works on mobile (basic responsiveness)
  • Looks professional (shadcnblocks helps here)

Can ship without:

  • Perfect error messages
  • Edge case handling
  • Admin dashboards
  • Analytics
  • Perfect performance
  • Comprehensive tests
  • SEO optimization
  • Perfect accessibility (good enough is okay)

Resources

Component Libraries:

Backend Services:

Deployment:

Boilerplates:

  • create-next-app: Standard Next.js starter
  • create-t3-app: Next.js + tRPC + Prisma + Auth

Time Estimates (Solo Developer)

Project Type Prototype Time With This Skill
Landing page 1 day 4 hours
CRUD app 1 week 2 days
AI tool 2 weeks 3 days
SaaS MVP 1 month 1 week
Mobile web app 3 weeks 5 days

Key multiplier: Using pre-built components and managed services

Final Principles

  1. Ship fast, iterate faster - Perfect is the enemy of done
  2. Use what exists - 90% of features already have solutions
  3. TypeScript always - Bugs caught at compile time save hours of debugging
  4. Mobile-first - Easier to scale up than down
  5. Managed services - Your time is more valuable than $20/month
  6. Measure before optimizing - Fast enough beats perfectly fast
  7. User feedback > perfect code - Real users find real problems

Success in rapid prototyping comes from knowing what NOT to build. Every feature you don't build is time saved for the features that matter.