| name | philosophy-of-science |
| description | Master philosophy of science - scientific method, explanation, realism, theory change. Use for: scientific methodology, explanation, realism/anti-realism, paradigms. Triggers: 'scientific method', 'falsification', 'Popper', 'Kuhn', 'paradigm', 'scientific explanation', 'scientific realism', 'instrumentalism', 'theory change', 'confirmation', 'induction problem', 'underdetermination', 'demarcation', 'reduction', 'emergence'. |
Philosophy of Science Skill
Master the philosophical foundations of science: What is scientific method? What is explanation? Are scientific theories true?
Core Questions
| Question | Issue |
|---|---|
| What distinguishes science from non-science? | Demarcation |
| How do we confirm theories? | Confirmation |
| What is scientific explanation? | Explanation |
| Are theories true or useful fictions? | Realism |
| How does science change? | Theory change |
Scientific Method
The Problem of Induction
Hume's Problem: How do we justify inductive inference?
- Past regularities don't logically guarantee future ones
- Cannot use induction to justify induction (circular)
- Yet science relies on induction
Falsificationism (Popper)
POPPER'S FALSIFICATIONISM
═════════════════════════
DEMARCATION CRITERION
├── Science: Falsifiable claims
├── Pseudo-science: Unfalsifiable
└── Examples: Astrology, Freud (unfalsifiable)
METHOD
├── Bold conjectures
├── Severe tests
├── Refutation → new conjecture
└── Corroboration ≠ confirmation
KEY IDEA:
We never confirm theories
We only fail to falsify them
Asymmetry: One counterexample refutes
Problems:
- Theories rarely abandoned on single refutation
- Auxiliary hypotheses can absorb refutation
- No purely observational test
Paradigms (Kuhn)
KUHN'S STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS
══════════════════════════════════════════
NORMAL SCIENCE
├── Work within paradigm
├── Puzzle-solving
├── Anomalies accumulate
└── Paradigm defines problems, methods
CRISIS
├── Too many anomalies
├── Alternative paradigms emerge
├── Debate between paradigms
└── Incommensurability
SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
├── Paradigm shift
├── Not cumulative progress
├── New worldview
└── Gestalt switch
EXAMPLES:
├── Ptolemy → Copernicus
├── Newton → Einstein
└── Phlogiston → Oxygen
Scientific Explanation
Deductive-Nomological (D-N) Model
D-N MODEL (Hempel)
══════════════════
EXPLANATION STRUCTURE:
L₁, L₂, ... Lₙ (Laws)
C₁, C₂, ... Cₙ (Conditions)
─────────────────
E (Explanandum)
REQUIREMENTS:
├── Deductively valid
├── Laws are essential
├── Empirically testable
└── True premises
EXAMPLE:
All metals expand when heated.
This is metal.
This was heated.
∴ This expanded.
Problems:
- Symmetry problem (flagpole and shadow)
- Irrelevance problem
- Statistical explanation
Causal-Mechanical Model
- Explanation = tracing causal mechanism
- Not just subsumption under laws
- Mechanisms explain, not just correlate
Unificationism
- Explanation = unifying diverse phenomena
- Fewer patterns explaining more
- Newton unified celestial and terrestrial motion
Scientific Realism
The Debate
Scientific Realism:
- Mature scientific theories are approximately true
- Theoretical entities (electrons, genes) exist
- Science aims at truth
Anti-Realism (Instrumentalism):
- Theories are useful tools
- Theoretical terms don't refer
- Science aims at empirical adequacy
Arguments for Realism
No Miracles Argument:
- Science's success would be miraculous if theories weren't true
- Best explanation of predictive success is truth
- "The only philosophy that doesn't make science a miracle"
Arguments Against Realism
Pessimistic Meta-Induction:
- Past "successful" theories were false
- Caloric, phlogiston, ether
- Current theories probably also false
Underdetermination:
- Multiple theories compatible with same evidence
- Evidence doesn't uniquely determine theory
- Why think ours is true?
Structural Realism
Epistemic: We can know structure, not nature Ontic: Structure is all there is
Reduction and Emergence
Reductionism
- Higher-level sciences reducible to lower
- Biology → Chemistry → Physics
- Unity of science thesis
Emergence
- Some properties not reducible
- Whole greater than parts
- Consciousness? Life?
Multiple Realizability
- Same higher-level state, different lower-level realizations
- Pain in humans ≠ pain in octopi (neurally)
- Blocks type-identity reduction
Key Debates
Demarcation
- What makes something science?
- Falsifiability? Paradigms? Method?
- Is demarcation possible?
Theory Choice
- Empirical adequacy
- Simplicity, parsimony
- Explanatory power
- Fruitfulness
Values in Science
- Value-free ideal achievable?
- Social influences on science
- Science studies, feminist philosophy of science
Key Vocabulary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Falsification | Disproving through counterevidence |
| Paradigm | Shared framework for research |
| Incommensurability | Paradigms can't be compared |
| Confirmation | Evidence supporting theory |
| Underdetermination | Evidence doesn't determine theory |
| Instrumentalism | Theories are tools, not truths |
| Reduction | Higher explained by lower |
| Emergence | Irreducible higher-level properties |
| Demarcation | Distinguishing science from non-science |
| Corroboration | Surviving falsification attempts |
Integration with Repository
Related Themes
thoughts/knowledge/: Scientific knowledgethoughts/consciousness/: Neuroscience methodology