Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

political-philosophy

@chrislemke/stoffy
0
0

Master political philosophy - justice, rights, liberty, democracy, state legitimacy. Use for: justice, political authority, rights, freedom, social contract. Triggers: 'justice', 'political', 'rights', 'liberty', 'freedom', 'democracy', 'Rawls', 'social contract', 'state', 'legitimacy', 'authority', 'equality', 'libertarianism', 'distributive justice', 'liberalism', 'communitarianism', 'republicanism'.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name political-philosophy
description Master political philosophy - justice, rights, liberty, democracy, state legitimacy. Use for: justice, political authority, rights, freedom, social contract. Triggers: 'justice', 'political', 'rights', 'liberty', 'freedom', 'democracy', 'Rawls', 'social contract', 'state', 'legitimacy', 'authority', 'equality', 'libertarianism', 'distributive justice', 'liberalism', 'communitarianism', 'republicanism'.

Political Philosophy Skill

Master the fundamental questions of political life: What justifies the state? What is justice? What are our rights?

Core Questions

Question Issue
Why obey the state? Political obligation
What is justice? Distributive principles
What are rights? Nature and basis of rights
What is freedom? Liberty, positive/negative
Who should rule? Democratic theory

State Legitimacy

Social Contract Theories

SOCIAL CONTRACT TRADITION
═════════════════════════

HOBBES (1588-1679)
├── State of nature: War of all against all
├── Life: "Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, short"
├── Contract: Give up freedom for security
└── Result: Absolute sovereign (Leviathan)

LOCKE (1632-1704)
├── State of nature: Peace with inconveniences
├── Natural rights: Life, liberty, property
├── Contract: Limited government to protect rights
└── Result: Liberal constitutional state

ROUSSEAU (1712-1778)
├── State of nature: Noble savage, corrupted by society
├── Problem: How to be free yet bound by law?
├── Solution: General will (not will of all)
└── Result: Direct democracy, civic virtue

Contemporary Social Contract

Rawls: Hypothetical contract behind veil of ignorance Gauthier: Bargaining among rational self-interested agents Scanlon: Principles no one could reasonably reject


Justice

Rawls's Theory

RAWLSIAN JUSTICE
════════════════

ORIGINAL POSITION
├── Hypothetical choice situation
├── Veil of ignorance: Don't know your place
├── Rational, self-interested choosers
└── What principles would you choose?

TWO PRINCIPLES
1. LIBERTY PRINCIPLE
   └── Equal basic liberties for all
   └── Speech, conscience, association, etc.

2. DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE
   └── Inequalities only if they benefit worst-off
   └── With fair equality of opportunity

PRIORITY:
Liberty > Fair opportunity > Difference principle

Alternative Theories

Theory Key Thinker Principle
Utilitarianism Mill Maximize total welfare
Libertarianism Nozick Minimal state, property rights
Communitarianism Sandel, MacIntyre Community shapes justice
Capabilities Sen, Nussbaum Ensure capabilities for all

Nozick's Entitlement Theory

LIBERTARIAN JUSTICE
═══════════════════

JUSTICE IN ACQUISITION
├── How did you originally get it?
└── Must be legitimate

JUSTICE IN TRANSFER
├── Voluntary exchange
└── Gift, sale, etc.

RECTIFICATION
├── Correct past injustices
└── Compensation, restitution

MINIMAL STATE
├── Only protection services
├── No redistribution
└── "Taxation is forced labor"

Liberty

Negative vs. Positive Freedom

Negative (Berlin): Freedom FROM interference

  • You're free if no one stops you
  • Liberal tradition

Positive: Freedom TO achieve goals

  • You're free if you can realize your potential
  • May require resources, support

Republican Liberty

Non-Domination (Pettit):

  • Freedom as absence of arbitrary power over you
  • Not just non-interference
  • Slave with kind master is still unfree

Rights

Nature of Rights

Natural Rights: Pre-political, inherent in persons Legal Rights: Created by law, conventional Moral Rights: May or may not be legal

Rights as Trumps (Dworkin)

Rights override utilitarian calculations Individual rights > Collective good

Will Theory vs. Interest Theory

Will Theory: Rights protect choices Interest Theory: Rights protect interests


Democracy

Justifications

Justification Claim
Intrinsic Democratic participation is valuable in itself
Instrumental Democracy produces best outcomes
Epistemic Collective wisdom (Condorcet)
Procedural Fair procedure regardless of outcome

Problems

  • Tyranny of majority
  • Voter ignorance
  • Special interests
  • Minority rights

Key Debates

Liberty vs. Equality

  • Trade-off or compatible?
  • Economic liberty vs. economic equality
  • Formal vs. substantive equality

Individual vs. Community

  • Liberal: Individual prior to community
  • Communitarian: Community shapes individuals
  • Identity, tradition, solidarity

Multiculturalism

  • Cultural rights
  • Recognition
  • Integration vs. assimilation

Key Vocabulary

Term Meaning
Legitimacy Rightful authority
Sovereignty Supreme power
Social contract Agreement creating state
General will Common good (Rousseau)
Veil of ignorance Not knowing one's place
Difference principle Benefit worst-off
Negative liberty Freedom from interference
Positive liberty Freedom to achieve
Natural rights Pre-political rights
Distributive justice Fair distribution

Integration with Repository

Related Themes

  • thoughts/morality/: Justice, rights
  • thoughts/free_will/: Political freedom