| name | plan-gap-analysis |
| description | Analyze gaps between implementation plans and actual codebase implementation for the Rust self-learning memory project |
Plan Gap Analysis Skill
Systematically analyze the implementation status of the self-learning memory system by comparing the detailed plans in plans/ against the actual codebase implementation.
Purpose
This skill enables comprehensive gap analysis between:
- Documented plans (Phase 1-6 in plans/ folder)
- Actual implementation (Rust codebase)
- Missing features, tests, and documentation
- Unimplemented components from the roadmap
Workflow
Phase 1: Plan Inventory
Read all plan files in
plans/directory:00-overview.md- Project summary and metrics01-understand.md- Requirements and components02-plan.md- Architecture decisions and roadmap03-execute.md- Implementation details04-review.md- Quality requirements05-secure.md- Security requirements06-feedback-loop.md- Refinements and improvements
Extract requirements from each phase:
- Functional requirements (FR1-FR7)
- Non-functional requirements (NFR1-NFR6)
- Data structures and types
- Functions and APIs
- Tests and benchmarks
- Security measures
Phase 2: Codebase Inventory
Scan Rust crates structure:
# List all crates find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "*/target/*" # List all Rust source files find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/target/*"Analyze each crate:
memory-core- Core data structures and memory orchestrationmemory-storage-turso- Turso/libSQL storage backendmemory-storage-redb- redb cache layermemory-mcp- MCP server and sandboxtest-utils- Test utilitiesbenches- Performance benchmarks
Check implementation status:
- Data structures (Episode, Pattern, Heuristic, etc.)
- Core functions (start_episode, log_step, complete_episode, etc.)
- Storage operations (CRUD, queries, sync)
- Pattern extraction algorithms
- MCP integration and sandboxing
- Tests (unit, integration, benchmarks)
Phase 3: Gap Identification
For each phase, identify:
Phase 1 (UNDERSTAND) Gaps
- Missing data structures from specification
- Incomplete type definitions
- Missing edge case handling
Phase 2 (PLAN) Gaps
- Architectural decisions not implemented
- Success metrics not tracked
- Feature flags not implemented
- Circuit breakers missing
- Telemetry not fully implemented
Phase 3 (EXECUTE) Gaps
- Storage agent deliverables incomplete
- Learning agent features missing
- MCP agent sandbox security incomplete
- Sync mechanism not fully implemented
Phase 4 (REVIEW) Gaps
- Compliance tests missing (FR1-FR7)
- Performance tests incomplete (NFR1-NFR6)
- Quality metrics not measured
- Code coverage below 90%
- Integration tests incomplete
Phase 5 (SECURE) Gaps
- Security attack surface analysis missing
- Sandbox escape prevention incomplete
- SQL injection prevention validation missing
- Resource limits not enforced
- Network security not validated
- Penetration tests not implemented
Phase 6 (FEEDBACK LOOP) Gaps
- Edge case refinements not implemented
- Performance optimizations pending
- Two-phase commit not implemented
- Pattern extraction queue missing
- Schema migration not implemented
Phase 4: Prioritization
Categorize gaps by priority:
Critical (Blocks production):
- Security vulnerabilities
- Data corruption risks
- Missing core functionality
High (Affects quality):
- Performance targets not met
- Test coverage below target
- Missing error handling
Medium (Technical debt):
- Code quality issues
- Documentation gaps
- Optimization opportunities
Low (Nice to have):
- Future enhancements
- Optional features
- Cosmetic improvements
Phase 5: TODO Generation
Generate structured TODO list:
## Phase [N]: [PHASE_NAME]
### Critical Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item] (Week X deliverable)
- **File**: path/to/file.rs
- **Plan Reference**: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
- **Impact**: [Description of impact]
- **Effort**: [Estimated effort]
### High Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item]
...
### Medium Priority
...
### Low Priority
...
Analysis Process
// Pseudo-code for analysis flow
async fn analyze_plan_gaps() -> GapAnalysisReport {
let plans = read_all_plan_files().await;
let codebase = scan_rust_codebase().await;
let mut gaps = Vec::new();
for phase in &plans {
let requirements = extract_requirements(phase);
let implementation = find_implementation(&codebase, &requirements);
for req in requirements {
if !implementation.contains(&req) {
gaps.push(Gap {
phase: phase.number,
requirement: req,
priority: calculate_priority(&req),
file_location: find_best_location(&codebase, &req),
plan_reference: format_reference(phase, &req),
});
}
}
}
GapAnalysisReport {
total_requirements: count_all_requirements(&plans),
implemented: codebase.count_implementations(),
gaps: gaps.sorted_by_priority(),
completion_percentage: calculate_completion(&gaps),
}
}
Key Files to Analyze
Plans Directory
plans/00-overview.md- Success metrics and targetsplans/01-understand.md- All 47 core data structuresplans/02-plan.md- 12-week roadmap, success metricsplans/03-execute.md- Week 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8 deliverablesplans/04-review.md- FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 testsplans/05-secure.md- Security attack surfaces and mitigationsplans/06-feedback-loop.md- Refinements and edge cases
Codebase to Check
Core Types (memory-core/src/):
types.rs- TaskContext, TaskType, ComplexityLevel, etc.episode.rs- Episode, ExecutionStep, ExecutionResultpattern.rs- Pattern enum variants, Heuristicerror.rs- Error types and Resultmemory.rs- SelfLearningMemory main orchestratorextraction.rs- PatternExtractor trait and implementationsreward.rs- RewardCalculatorreflection.rs- ReflectionGeneratorsync.rs- Storage synchronization
Storage (memory-storage-*/src/):
- Turso: schema.rs, storage.rs (CRUD, queries)
- redb: tables.rs, storage.rs (cache operations)
MCP (memory-mcp/src/):
server.rs- MCP server implementationsandbox.rs- Code execution sandboxtypes.rs- Tool definitions
Tests:
- Unit tests in each module
- Integration tests in
tests/directories - Benchmarks in
benches/
Output Format
# Plan Gap Analysis Report
**Generated**: [Date]
**Project**: rust-self-learning-memory
**Total Requirements**: X
**Implemented**: Y (Z%)
**Gaps Identified**: N
## Executive Summary
- Phase 1: X/Y complete
- Phase 2: X/Y complete
- Phase 3: X/Y complete
- Phase 4: X/Y complete
- Phase 5: X/Y complete
- Phase 6: X/Y complete
## Detailed Gap Analysis
### Phase 1: UNDERSTAND
**Completion**: X%
#### Critical Gaps
1. [Gap description]
- **Plan**: plans/01-understand.md:123
- **Missing in**: memory-core/src/types.rs
- **Priority**: Critical
- **Effort**: [hours/days]
...
### Phase 2: PLAN
...
## Recommended Action Plan
### Week 1-2 Focus
- [ ] Critical gap 1
- [ ] Critical gap 2
### Week 3-4 Focus
...
## Metrics
| Metric | Target | Current | Status |
|--------|--------|---------|--------|
| Retrieval Latency (P95) | <100ms | TBD | 🔴 Not Tested |
| Pattern Accuracy | >70% | TBD | 🔴 Not Tested |
| Test Coverage | >90% | X% | 🟡 Below Target |
| Episode Capacity | 10,000+ | TBD | 🔴 Not Tested |
| Security Vulnerabilities | 0 critical | X | 🔴 Not Assessed |
Best Practices
- Be Systematic: Check every requirement in every plan
- Be Specific: Reference exact file locations and line numbers
- Be Accurate: Verify implementation, don't assume
- Be Prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low
- Be Actionable: Include file paths and effort estimates
Example Usage
When invoked, this skill will:
- Read all 8 plan markdown files
- Scan all Rust source files
- Cross-reference requirements vs implementation
- Generate prioritized TODO list by phase
- Output comprehensive gap analysis report