Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Analyze gaps between implementation plans and actual codebase implementation for the Rust self-learning memory project

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name plan-gap-analysis
description Analyze gaps between implementation plans and actual codebase implementation for the Rust self-learning memory project

Plan Gap Analysis Skill

Systematically analyze the implementation status of the self-learning memory system by comparing the detailed plans in plans/ against the actual codebase implementation.

Purpose

This skill enables comprehensive gap analysis between:

  • Documented plans (Phase 1-6 in plans/ folder)
  • Actual implementation (Rust codebase)
  • Missing features, tests, and documentation
  • Unimplemented components from the roadmap

Workflow

Phase 1: Plan Inventory

  1. Read all plan files in plans/ directory:

    • 00-overview.md - Project summary and metrics
    • 01-understand.md - Requirements and components
    • 02-plan.md - Architecture decisions and roadmap
    • 03-execute.md - Implementation details
    • 04-review.md - Quality requirements
    • 05-secure.md - Security requirements
    • 06-feedback-loop.md - Refinements and improvements
  2. Extract requirements from each phase:

    • Functional requirements (FR1-FR7)
    • Non-functional requirements (NFR1-NFR6)
    • Data structures and types
    • Functions and APIs
    • Tests and benchmarks
    • Security measures

Phase 2: Codebase Inventory

  1. Scan Rust crates structure:

    # List all crates
    find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "*/target/*"
    
    # List all Rust source files
    find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/target/*"
    
  2. Analyze each crate:

    • memory-core - Core data structures and memory orchestration
    • memory-storage-turso - Turso/libSQL storage backend
    • memory-storage-redb - redb cache layer
    • memory-mcp - MCP server and sandbox
    • test-utils - Test utilities
    • benches - Performance benchmarks
  3. Check implementation status:

    • Data structures (Episode, Pattern, Heuristic, etc.)
    • Core functions (start_episode, log_step, complete_episode, etc.)
    • Storage operations (CRUD, queries, sync)
    • Pattern extraction algorithms
    • MCP integration and sandboxing
    • Tests (unit, integration, benchmarks)

Phase 3: Gap Identification

For each phase, identify:

Phase 1 (UNDERSTAND) Gaps

  • Missing data structures from specification
  • Incomplete type definitions
  • Missing edge case handling

Phase 2 (PLAN) Gaps

  • Architectural decisions not implemented
  • Success metrics not tracked
  • Feature flags not implemented
  • Circuit breakers missing
  • Telemetry not fully implemented

Phase 3 (EXECUTE) Gaps

  • Storage agent deliverables incomplete
  • Learning agent features missing
  • MCP agent sandbox security incomplete
  • Sync mechanism not fully implemented

Phase 4 (REVIEW) Gaps

  • Compliance tests missing (FR1-FR7)
  • Performance tests incomplete (NFR1-NFR6)
  • Quality metrics not measured
  • Code coverage below 90%
  • Integration tests incomplete

Phase 5 (SECURE) Gaps

  • Security attack surface analysis missing
  • Sandbox escape prevention incomplete
  • SQL injection prevention validation missing
  • Resource limits not enforced
  • Network security not validated
  • Penetration tests not implemented

Phase 6 (FEEDBACK LOOP) Gaps

  • Edge case refinements not implemented
  • Performance optimizations pending
  • Two-phase commit not implemented
  • Pattern extraction queue missing
  • Schema migration not implemented

Phase 4: Prioritization

Categorize gaps by priority:

Critical (Blocks production):

  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Data corruption risks
  • Missing core functionality

High (Affects quality):

  • Performance targets not met
  • Test coverage below target
  • Missing error handling

Medium (Technical debt):

  • Code quality issues
  • Documentation gaps
  • Optimization opportunities

Low (Nice to have):

  • Future enhancements
  • Optional features
  • Cosmetic improvements

Phase 5: TODO Generation

Generate structured TODO list:

## Phase [N]: [PHASE_NAME]

### Critical Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item] (Week X deliverable)
  - **File**: path/to/file.rs
  - **Plan Reference**: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
  - **Impact**: [Description of impact]
  - **Effort**: [Estimated effort]

### High Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item]
  ...

### Medium Priority
...

### Low Priority
...

Analysis Process

// Pseudo-code for analysis flow
async fn analyze_plan_gaps() -> GapAnalysisReport {
    let plans = read_all_plan_files().await;
    let codebase = scan_rust_codebase().await;

    let mut gaps = Vec::new();

    for phase in &plans {
        let requirements = extract_requirements(phase);
        let implementation = find_implementation(&codebase, &requirements);

        for req in requirements {
            if !implementation.contains(&req) {
                gaps.push(Gap {
                    phase: phase.number,
                    requirement: req,
                    priority: calculate_priority(&req),
                    file_location: find_best_location(&codebase, &req),
                    plan_reference: format_reference(phase, &req),
                });
            }
        }
    }

    GapAnalysisReport {
        total_requirements: count_all_requirements(&plans),
        implemented: codebase.count_implementations(),
        gaps: gaps.sorted_by_priority(),
        completion_percentage: calculate_completion(&gaps),
    }
}

Key Files to Analyze

Plans Directory

  • plans/00-overview.md - Success metrics and targets
  • plans/01-understand.md - All 47 core data structures
  • plans/02-plan.md - 12-week roadmap, success metrics
  • plans/03-execute.md - Week 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8 deliverables
  • plans/04-review.md - FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 tests
  • plans/05-secure.md - Security attack surfaces and mitigations
  • plans/06-feedback-loop.md - Refinements and edge cases

Codebase to Check

Core Types (memory-core/src/):

  • types.rs - TaskContext, TaskType, ComplexityLevel, etc.
  • episode.rs - Episode, ExecutionStep, ExecutionResult
  • pattern.rs - Pattern enum variants, Heuristic
  • error.rs - Error types and Result
  • memory.rs - SelfLearningMemory main orchestrator
  • extraction.rs - PatternExtractor trait and implementations
  • reward.rs - RewardCalculator
  • reflection.rs - ReflectionGenerator
  • sync.rs - Storage synchronization

Storage (memory-storage-*/src/):

  • Turso: schema.rs, storage.rs (CRUD, queries)
  • redb: tables.rs, storage.rs (cache operations)

MCP (memory-mcp/src/):

  • server.rs - MCP server implementation
  • sandbox.rs - Code execution sandbox
  • types.rs - Tool definitions

Tests:

  • Unit tests in each module
  • Integration tests in tests/ directories
  • Benchmarks in benches/

Output Format

# Plan Gap Analysis Report
**Generated**: [Date]
**Project**: rust-self-learning-memory
**Total Requirements**: X
**Implemented**: Y (Z%)
**Gaps Identified**: N

## Executive Summary
- Phase 1: X/Y complete
- Phase 2: X/Y complete
- Phase 3: X/Y complete
- Phase 4: X/Y complete
- Phase 5: X/Y complete
- Phase 6: X/Y complete

## Detailed Gap Analysis

### Phase 1: UNDERSTAND
**Completion**: X%

#### Critical Gaps
1. [Gap description]
   - **Plan**: plans/01-understand.md:123
   - **Missing in**: memory-core/src/types.rs
   - **Priority**: Critical
   - **Effort**: [hours/days]

...

### Phase 2: PLAN
...

## Recommended Action Plan

### Week 1-2 Focus
- [ ] Critical gap 1
- [ ] Critical gap 2

### Week 3-4 Focus
...

## Metrics

| Metric | Target | Current | Status |
|--------|--------|---------|--------|
| Retrieval Latency (P95) | <100ms | TBD | 🔴 Not Tested |
| Pattern Accuracy | >70% | TBD | 🔴 Not Tested |
| Test Coverage | >90% | X% | 🟡 Below Target |
| Episode Capacity | 10,000+ | TBD | 🔴 Not Tested |
| Security Vulnerabilities | 0 critical | X | 🔴 Not Assessed |

Best Practices

  1. Be Systematic: Check every requirement in every plan
  2. Be Specific: Reference exact file locations and line numbers
  3. Be Accurate: Verify implementation, don't assume
  4. Be Prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low
  5. Be Actionable: Include file paths and effort estimates

Example Usage

When invoked, this skill will:

  1. Read all 8 plan markdown files
  2. Scan all Rust source files
  3. Cross-reference requirements vs implementation
  4. Generate prioritized TODO list by phase
  5. Output comprehensive gap analysis report