Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback
0
0

Update project progress after completing tasks by modifying CLAUDE.md status sections and logging details to MIGRATION_LOG.md. Use when finishing a migration, completing a task, resolving a blocker, or when the user asks to update progress or log work completion.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name update-progress
description Update project progress after completing tasks by modifying CLAUDE.md status sections and logging details to MIGRATION_LOG.md. Use when finishing a migration, completing a task, resolving a blocker, or when the user asks to update progress or log work completion.

Update Progress

Systematically update project documentation after completing work to maintain accurate status tracking and detailed history.

When to Use

Trigger this skill after:

  • Completing a file migration
  • Finishing any task listed in CLAUDE.md
  • Resolving a blocker
  • Discovering new tasks during work
  • User explicitly asks to "update progress" or "log this work"

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Completion Information

Ask the user (or determine from context) detailed questions to create comprehensive migration logs:

1. Basic Information

  • Task completed: What specific task or migration was completed?
  • Files involved: Which source file(s) and destination file(s)?
  • Time spent: Approximately how long did it take? (e.g., "45 minutes")
  • Complexity rating: Low/Medium/High based on refactoring difficulty

2. Migration Summary

  • Original purpose: What was the original file's purpose/functionality?
  • Target architecture layer: Which layer does it belong to now? (Problem/Algorithm/Data/Visualization)
  • Key changes overview: 2-3 sentence summary of what was accomplished

3. Specific Code Changes

  • Modified functions/classes: List specific functions, classes, or methods that were added or modified
  • Code snippets: Key before/after code examples showing refactoring
  • Architectural improvements: Beyond basic refactoring checklist:
    • Type hints added/improved?
    • Error handling enhancements?
    • Configuration parameterization?
    • Performance optimizations?

4. Refactoring Details (Complete Checklist)

  • Extracted hardcoded values: What specific values were parameterized?
  • Decoupled from paper-specific logic: How was the code generalized?
  • Added docstrings: What style was used? Which methods documented?
  • Updated imports: How were imports changed? (absoluteβ†’relative, dependency management)
  • Created test case: What tests were created? (function names, coverage)
  • Verified functionality: How was verification done? (compilation, import, runtime tests)

5. Issues & Solutions

For each issue encountered:

  • Description: What exactly went wrong?
  • Impact: How did it affect the migration?
  • Solution: What specific fix was implemented?
  • Rationale: Why was this solution chosen over alternatives?

6. Verification & Testing

  • Tests created: List test functions and what they verify
  • Verification steps: Code compilation, import tests, type checks, runtime tests
  • Test results: What passed/failed? Any remaining test requirements?

7. File Statistics

  • Original file size: Approximate line count of source file(s)
  • New file size: Approximate line count of destination file
  • Changes: Lines added, modified, removed

8. Design Decisions & Rationale

  • Key decisions: What architectural or implementation choices were made?
  • Rationale: Why were these choices made? Trade-offs considered?

9. Follow-up Tasks Identified

  • Immediate follow-up: Tasks that should be done next
  • Future improvements: Enhancements identified but not implemented
  • Documentation needs: What documentation should be added?

10. Notes & Observations

  • Surprises: What was easier/harder than expected?
  • Lessons learned: What would you do differently next time?
  • Observations: Interesting patterns, code quality notes, etc.

Step 2: Update CLAUDE.md

Follow these updates in order:

  1. Update "Last Updated" date

    • Change to current date (YYYY-MM-DD)
  2. Move completed task

    • Find task in "In Progress 🚧" section
    • Move to "Completed βœ…" section
    • Keep checkbox format: - [x] Task description
  3. Update "In Progress" (if applicable)

    • Remove completed task
    • Add next task if starting it immediately
    • If no tasks in progress, leave section empty
  4. Update "Next Steps" (if applicable)

    • Add newly discovered tasks
    • Reorder by priority if needed
    • Remove task if just started (moved to In Progress)
  5. Update or clear "Blockers"

    • If blocker was resolved, remove it
    • If new blocker found, add it
    • Change to "None currently" if empty
  6. Update Phase (if milestone reached)

    • Check if phase transition occurred
    • Update status line if needed
    • Phase 1 β†’ Phase 2: All minimal migrations done
    • Phase 2 β†’ Phase 3: Refactoring complete

See update_templates.md for detailed examples.

Step 3: Update MIGRATION_LOG.md

Only if the completed work was a file migration.

  1. Update progress summary

    • Increment "Completed" count
    • Decrement "Remaining" count
    • Recalculate "Completion Rate" percentage
    • Formula: (Completed / Total Files) * 100
  2. Add detailed migration entry

    • Insert at top of "Migration History" (newest first)
    • Use current timestamp: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
    • Set status: βœ… Completed (or 🚧/⚠️/❌ if other)
    • Use the detailed migration template (see update_templates.md):
      • Include basic information: time spent, complexity rating
      • Write migration summary with purpose and key changes
      • List specific code changes with function/class names
      • Include code snippets (before/after) when illustrative
      • Complete all architectural refactoring checkboxes
      • Document each issue with description, impact, solution, rationale
      • Detail verification steps and test results
      • Provide file statistics (line counts)
      • Explain design decisions and rationale
      • List follow-up tasks identified
      • Add notes and observations
  3. Update files remaining checklist

    • Find the migrated file in the list
    • Change [ ] to [x]
  4. Add to common issues (if applicable)

    • If new issue type encountered, add it
    • Include solution for future reference
  5. Update "Last Updated" date

    • Change to current date at bottom of file

See update_templates.md for entry template.

Step 4: Verify and Commit

  1. Read back the changes

    • Verify CLAUDE.md updates are correct
    • Verify MIGRATION_LOG.md entry is complete
    • Check for any formatting issues
  2. Suggest git commit (optional)

    • Recommend committing the progress update
    • Suggest commit message like:
      • "Update progress: completed migration of instance.py"
      • "Update progress: finished quickstart tutorial"

Quick Reference

For Non-Migration Tasks

Update only CLAUDE.md:

  1. Update "Last Updated" date
  2. Move task from "In Progress" to "Completed"
  3. Update other sections as needed

For Migration Tasks

Update both CLAUDE.md and MIGRATION_LOG.md:

  1. Update CLAUDE.md (all steps in Step 2)
  2. Update MIGRATION_LOG.md (all steps in Step 3)

Status Symbols Guide

Use these consistently in logs:

  • βœ… Completed - Successfully finished
  • 🚧 In Progress - Currently working
  • ⚠️ Issues - Done but has known issues
  • ❌ Failed - Could not complete
  • πŸ“‹ Planned - Scheduled for future

Integration with Other Skills

After using this skill:

  • Suggest running session-start to see updated status
  • If more work to do, suggest next priority task
  • If migration complete (9/9), celebrate and suggest Phase 2 planning

Before using this skill:

  • Should have used migrate-module or completed other work
  • Have clear understanding of what was accomplished

Example Scenarios

Scenario 1: Completed File Migration

User: "I just finished migrating instance.py"

Actions:

  1. Ask about refactoring details and any issues
  2. Update CLAUDE.md:
    • Last Updated: Today's date
    • Move "Migrate instance.py" to Completed
  3. Update MIGRATION_LOG.md:
    • Progress: 1/9 (11%)
    • Add detailed entry with all information
    • Mark instance.py as [x] in checklist
  4. Suggest: "Progress updated! 1/9 files migrated. Next priority: Migrate solution.py?"

Scenario 2: Non-Migration Task

User: "I created the quickstart tutorial"

Actions:

  1. Update CLAUDE.md only:
    • Last Updated: Today's date
    • Move "Create quickstart tutorial" to Completed
    • Add to Next Steps: "Test quickstart tutorial with fresh install"
  2. Suggest: "Progress updated! Want to start on the next task?"

Scenario 3: Blocker Resolved

User: "I fixed the circular import issue"

Actions:

  1. Update CLAUDE.md:
    • Last Updated: Today's date
    • Remove blocker from Blockers section
    • Change to "None currently"
  2. Update MIGRATION_LOG.md (if was migration-related):
    • Add resolution to the issue section
    • Add to Common Issues if helpful
  3. Suggest: "Blocker cleared! Ready to continue with the migration?"

Tips for Effective Logging

Core Principles

  • Be specific and concrete: "Extracted battery_capacity=100 to constructor parameter with default value" not "made battery configurable"
  • Include context and rationale: Explain why decisions were made, not just what was done. "Chose to keep classes together because..." vs "Moved classes"
  • Document the unexpected: Note what was easier/harder than expected, surprises, and lessons learned
  • Think future value: What information would help you or someone else 3-6 months from now?

Detailed Logging Guidelines

  • Code changes: List specific functions/methods modified, not just "refactored code"
  • Examples matter: Include before/after code snippets for key refactoring patterns
  • Issue documentation: For each issue: description, impact, solution, rationale
  • Quantify: Use line counts, time estimates, complexity ratings when possible
  • Structure: Follow the detailed template sections for comprehensive coverage

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • ❌ Vague: "Improved performance" β†’ βœ… "Reduced distance matrix calculation from O(nΒ²) to O(n log n)"
  • ❌ Generic: "Fixed bugs" β†’ βœ… "Fixed index out of bounds error in _extract_demands() method"
  • ❌ Minimal: "Added tests" β†’ βœ… "Added test_instance_creation(), test_solution_feasibility(), covering 85% of critical paths"
  • ❌ Assumptive: "As expected" β†’ βœ… "Validated assumption: column mapping adds <5% overhead"

Quality Checklist

  • Would this entry help you understand the changes 6 months from now?
  • Could someone new to the project understand what was done and why?
  • Are there concrete examples illustrating key refactoring?
  • Is the entry organized and easy to scan?
  • Are follow-up tasks clearly identified?

Reference

For detailed update patterns and templates, see update_templates.md.