| name | pal-chat |
| description | Collaborative thinking partner for brainstorming, development discussion, and exploring ideas using PAL MCP. Use when you need a second opinion, want to brainstorm, or need help thinking through a problem. Triggers on brainstorming requests, discussion needs, or when exploring ideas. |
PAL Chat - Collaborative Thinking
General-purpose collaboration for brainstorming, discussion, and exploring ideas.
When to Use
- Brainstorming solutions
- Getting a second opinion
- Discussing trade-offs
- Exploring ideas
- Validating approaches
- Rubber duck debugging
Quick Start
result = mcp__pal__chat(
prompt="I'm designing a rate limiting system. What approaches should I consider?",
working_directory_absolute_path="/path/to/project"
)
Required Parameters
| Parameter |
Type |
Description |
prompt |
string |
Your question or idea |
working_directory_absolute_path |
string |
Project directory |
Optional Parameters
| Parameter |
Type |
Description |
absolute_file_paths |
list |
Files to share for context |
model |
string |
Override model (default: openai/gpt-5) |
temperature |
float |
0 = deterministic, 1 = creative |
thinking_mode |
enum |
minimal/low/medium/high/max |
continuation_id |
string |
Continue conversation |
images |
list |
Image paths for visual context |
Example Uses
Brainstorming
mcp__pal__chat(
prompt="""
I need to design a notification system that:
- Supports email, SMS, push notifications
- Handles user preferences
- Allows batching to prevent spam
- Scales to 1M users
What architecture would you recommend?
""",
working_directory_absolute_path="/app"
)
Code Discussion
mcp__pal__chat(
prompt="""
I'm trying to decide between these approaches for the payment processor:
Option A: Strategy pattern with separate classes per provider
Option B: Single class with provider-specific methods
What are the trade-offs? Which would you recommend?
""",
working_directory_absolute_path="/app",
absolute_file_paths=[
"/app/payments/processor.py",
"/app/payments/stripe.py",
"/app/payments/paypal.py"
]
)
Validating Approach
mcp__pal__chat(
prompt="""
I'm planning to implement caching like this:
1. Check Redis for cached result
2. If miss, query database
3. Store in Redis with 5 min TTL
4. Invalidate on writes
Am I missing anything? Any edge cases to consider?
""",
working_directory_absolute_path="/app",
thinking_mode="high"
)
Multi-turn Discussion
# Start conversation
result = mcp__pal__chat(
prompt="Let's discuss microservices vs monolith for our startup",
working_directory_absolute_path="/app"
)
# Continue with context
result = mcp__pal__chat(
prompt="Good points. What about the team size factor? We have 4 developers.",
working_directory_absolute_path="/app",
continuation_id=result["continuation_id"]
)
Temperature Guide
| Value |
Use Case |
| 0.0 |
Technical analysis, debugging |
| 0.3 |
General discussion (default) |
| 0.7 |
Creative brainstorming |
| 1.0 |
Blue sky thinking |
Thinking Modes
| Mode |
Description |
minimal |
Quick responses |
low |
Light reasoning |
medium |
Balanced (default) |
high |
Deep analysis |
max |
Maximum reasoning |
Available Models
Top models for chat:
openai/gpt-5 - Strong reasoning (default)
deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 - Thinking-enabled
google/gemini-3-flash-preview - Fast, 1M context
x-ai/grok-4.1 - 2M context
Best Practices
- Provide context - Share relevant files
- Be specific - Clear questions get better answers
- Use continuation_id - Maintain conversation flow
- Adjust thinking_mode - Match complexity to problem
- Include constraints - Timeline, team size, tech stack