| name | delete-content |
| description | Delete files from knowledge base with directory governance. Use when user wants to remove or delete content. Reads RULE.md to check deletion permissions and handles dependencies. |
Delete Content Skill
Generic file deletion Skill that checks RULE.md permissions and handles dependencies safely.
When to use this Skill
- User says "delete", "remove", "trash"
- User requests content deletion
- User wants to clean up old files
Workflow
1. Identify Target File
If user provides file path:
- Verify file exists using
lsor Read - Confirm file identity
If user provides topic/title only:
- Search for file using Grep or Glob
- Pattern:
**/*keyword*.md - If multiple matches: present list, ask user to choose
- If no matches: report not found
Search strategies:
- Filename match:
find . -name "*keyword*" - Content match:
grep -r "keyword" . - README.md index: Search README.md files for references
2. Read Directory RULE.md
Locate and read RULE.md:
- Check file's directory for RULE.md
- If not found, check parent directories (inheritance)
- Parse RULE.md for deletion rules
Check for:
- Are deletions allowed? (some directories may be immutable or archive-only)
- Archive-instead rules (move to archive instead of delete)
- Backup requirements (create backup before delete)
- Dependency rules (check cross-references)
- Confirmation requirements
Example RULE.md deletion rules:
## Deletion Rules
- Deletions allowed with confirmation
- Check for cross-references before deleting
- Move to Archive/ subdirectory instead of permanent deletion
3. Check Dependencies
Search for cross-references:
- Use Grep to find links to this file:
grep -r "filename" . - Search for references in README.md files
- Check for reverse links (files this file links to)
- Identify files that depend on this content
Categorize dependencies:
- Incoming: Files that link to this file (will break if deleted)
- Outgoing: Files this file links to (won't break, but orphans references)
- Bidirectional: Cross-referenced files (mutual dependencies)
Severity assessment:
- Critical: Many incoming links, part of important workflow
- Warning: Some incoming links, moderately used
- Low: Few or no dependencies
4. User Confirmation
Present deletion summary:
⚠️ Delete confirmation required
File: [path to file]
Size: [file size]
Last modified: [timestamp]
Dependencies found:
- [file1.md] links to this file
- [file2.md] links to this file
(Total: X files reference this content)
RULE.md policy: [deletion policy summary]
Are you sure you want to delete this file?
- Yes, delete permanently
- Yes, move to archive (if RULE.md allows)
- No, cancel
- Show me the dependencies first
If user requests dependency review:
- Show each file that references this content
- Show the context (line where reference appears)
- Allow user to reconsider
5. Execute Deletion
Based on RULE.md policy:
Permanent deletion:
rm [file path]
- Only if RULE.md allows or user explicitly overrides
- Use Bash tool with rm command
- Verify deletion successful
Archive instead:
# Create archive directory if not exists
mkdir -p Archive/
# Move file to archive
mv [file path] Archive/[filename]
- Follow RULE.md archive structure
- Preserve filename or add timestamp
- Update archive README.md
Backup then delete:
# Create backup
cp [file path] [backup path]
# Then delete original
rm [file path]
- Create backup per RULE.md specification
- Verify backup successful before deleting
6. Governance Update
Update README.md:
- Read current README.md
- Find entry for deleted file
- Remove entry from file list
- Add to "Recent Changes" section:
- YYYY-MM-DD: Removed filename.md - Update "Last updated" timestamp
- Save README.md
Update parent README.md if needed:
- If directory now empty, update parent
- Note directory is empty or removed
Handle cross-references:
- Update files that referenced deleted content (if possible)
- Or add note in README.md: "Files with broken references: [list]"
- Offer to update broken links
Verify cleanup:
- Ensure no orphaned references
- Check README.md is valid markdown
- Confirm directory structure intact
7. Report to User
Confirm deletion complete:
✅ File deleted successfully
Deleted: [path to file]
Method: [permanent deletion / moved to archive / backed up then deleted]
README.md updated:
- [directory]/README.md
Dependencies handled:
- [X] files need attention (broken links)
- [List of affected files]
Recommendation: Review affected files to update/remove broken links
If archived instead:
✅ File archived successfully
Original: [original path]
Archived to: [archive path]
Archive method: [per RULE.md policy]
README.md updated:
- [directory]/README.md
- Archive/README.md
Note: File preserved in archive, not permanently deleted
Special Cases
Immutable Directory
If RULE.md specifies immutable:
## RULE.md says: "This directory is immutable - no deletions allowed"
Process:
- Warn user: "RULE.md indicates this directory should not have deletions"
- Explain policy reasoning
- Ask: "Do you want to override this rule?"
- If yes: proceed with deletion and log rule override
- If no: cancel operation
Archive-Only Policy
If RULE.md requires archival instead:
## RULE.md says: "Move to Archive/ instead of deleting"
Process:
- Don't offer permanent deletion
- Execute archive operation
- Update both original and archive README.md
- Report archive location
Batch Deletion
If user requests deleting multiple files:
User: "Delete all old notes from last year"
Process:
- Identify all matching files
- Check each file's RULE.md
- Check dependencies for each
- Present summary: "X files match, Y have dependencies"
- Request batch confirmation
- Execute deletions one by one
- Report summary of all deletions
Directory Deletion
If user wants to delete entire directory:
User: "Delete the old-project directory"
Process:
- Read directory RULE.md for deletion rules
- Check parent directory RULE.md for subdirectory rules
- Scan all files in directory for external dependencies
- Present comprehensive summary
- Warn: "This will delete X files and Y subdirectories"
- Request explicit confirmation
- Execute recursive deletion or archive
- Update parent README.md
Soft Delete (Mark as Deleted)
If RULE.md specifies soft delete:
## RULE.md says: "Mark files as deleted in frontmatter instead of removing"
Process:
- Don't delete file physically
- Update frontmatter:
status: deleted - Update README.md: mark as
[DELETED] filename.md - File stays but marked as obsolete
Error Handling
File Not Found
User: "Delete the transformer note"
→ Search for file
→ No matches found
→ Report: "I couldn't find a file about transformers. Nothing to delete."
Multiple Matches
User: "Delete the transformer note"
→ Find 3 files with "transformer"
→ Present list: "I found 3 files. Which one to delete?"
→ User selects → Proceed
RULE.md Forbids Deletion
RULE.md says: "Immutable directory"
→ Warn: "RULE.md forbids deletions in this directory"
→ Explain reasoning
→ Ask for override confirmation
→ If confirmed: proceed with warning note
High-Impact Dependencies
File has 50+ incoming references
→ Warn: "⚠️ HIGH IMPACT: 50+ files reference this content"
→ Show most critical dependencies
→ Recommend: "Consider archiving instead of deleting"
→ Require explicit "yes, delete anyway" confirmation
Deletion Fails
Bash rm command fails (permissions, file locked, etc.)
→ Report error clearly
→ Show exact error message
→ Suggest: "Check file permissions or if file is open in another program"
→ Offer alternatives: archive, rename, mark as deleted
Broken References After Deletion
Deletion successful but broken links remain
→ Report: "Deletion complete, but broken references detected in:"
→ List affected files
→ Offer: "Would you like me to update these files to remove broken links?"
→ If yes: update files to remove/fix references
Integration with Governance
This Skill automatically invokes the governance protocol:
Before deletion:
- Locate and read RULE.md
- Validate deletion is allowed
- Check dependency policy
During deletion:
- Follow RULE.md deletion method (delete, archive, backup)
- Execute safely
After deletion:
- Update README.md
- Handle broken references
- Verify cleanup complete
Examples
Example 1: Simple Deletion
User: "Delete the old transformer draft"
Skill workflow:
- Searches for file → Finds
Research/AI/2025-10-15-transformer-draft.md - Reads Research/AI/RULE.md → Deletions allowed with confirmation
- Checks dependencies → No references found
- Asks confirmation: "Delete transformer-draft.md? No dependencies found."
- User confirms
- Executes
rm Research/AI/2025-10-15-transformer-draft.md - Updates Research/AI/README.md (removes entry)
- Reports: "✅ Deleted transformer-draft.md"
Example 2: Archive Instead
User: "Delete the 2024 work logs"
Skill workflow:
- Finds Work/WorkLog/2024/ directory
- Reads Work/WorkLog/RULE.md → "Move old logs to Archive/ instead of deleting"
- Checks dependencies → Some cross-references to meeting notes
- Presents: "Found 2024 logs (52 files). RULE.md policy: archive instead of delete"
- User confirms
- Creates
Work/WorkLog/Archive/2024/if not exists - Executes
mv Work/WorkLog/2024/* Work/WorkLog/Archive/2024/ - Updates README.md files
- Reports: "✅ Archived 52 log files to Archive/2024/"
Example 3: High-Impact Deletion
User: "Delete the core-concepts document"
Skill workflow:
- Finds
Research/core-concepts.md - Reads Research/RULE.md → Deletions allowed
- Checks dependencies → 25 files reference this document
- Warns: "⚠️ HIGH IMPACT: 25 files reference core-concepts.md"
- Shows first 5 most critical dependencies
- Recommends: "This is a foundational document. Consider archiving instead?"
- User still chooses delete
- Asks: "Are you absolutely sure? Type 'delete core-concepts' to confirm"
- User confirms
- Executes deletion
- Updates README.md
- Reports broken references: "25 files need attention"
- Offers to help fix broken links
Best Practices
- Always check dependencies - Prevent broken knowledge base
- Read RULE.md first - Respect deletion policies
- Archive when possible - Preserve content instead of permanent deletion
- Confirm before deleting - No accidental deletions
- Update README.md immediately - Keep index accurate
- Handle broken links - Offer to fix cross-references
- Report clearly - User should know what was deleted and impact
- Follow RULE.md policies - Even if user requests override
Notes
- This Skill works with any directory structure by reading RULE.md
- Checks for dependencies to prevent broken knowledge base
- Offers archival as safer alternative to permanent deletion
- Always requires confirmation for destructive operations
- Maintains README.md index integrity
- Works in parallel with CLAUDE.md subagents
- Never deletes RULE.md files (requires explicit governance agent action)