Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Decision memory and session logging for AI-assisted development. Use when tracking architectural decisions, maintaining context across sessions, implementing confidence protocols, or coordinating between agents. Triggers on "memory trail", "decision memory", "track decisions", "session logging", "why did we decide", "check past decisions".

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name memory-trail
description Decision memory and session logging for AI-assisted development. Use when tracking architectural decisions, maintaining context across sessions, implementing confidence protocols, or coordinating between agents. Triggers on "memory trail", "decision memory", "track decisions", "session logging", "why did we decide", "check past decisions".

Memory Trail v1.0

Purpose: Lightweight persistence layer for AI-assisted development that tracks WHY decisions are made, not just WHAT changed.

Core insight: Checkpoints track WHAT changed; Memory Trail tracks WHY.


Quick Start

To implement Memory Trail in a project:

  1. Create docs/DECISION_MEMORY.md using template in assets/DECISION_MEMORY_TEMPLATE.md
  2. Create agent rules file (.roo/rules-code/rules.md or equivalent) using assets/AGENT_RULES_TEMPLATE.md
  3. Create docs/sessions/ directory for session logs
  4. Customize: Add project-specific critical decisions to the Quick Reference section

The 4 Components

1. Decision Memory

File: docs/DECISION_MEMORY.md

Architectural decisions as constraints. Agents read before implementing.

Format:

### [DEC-001] Decision Title
**Category:** ARCHITECTURE | TECHNOLOGY | PATTERN | POLICY
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Status:** ACTIVE

**Context:** What prompted this
**Decision:** What you decided
**Rationale:** Why this choice
**Consequences:** What this constrains

Agent protocol:

  • Read before significant changes
  • Cite as [per DEC-XXX] when following
  • STOP if action conflicts
  • Propose new decisions for architectural choices

2. Confidence Protocol

Signal uncertainty at START of every response:

Level When Behavior
🟢 CERTAIN (95%+) Routine, reversible Proceed, log action
🔵 CONFIDENT (80-94%) Standard, some complexity Show intent, proceed
🟡 PROBABLE (60-79%) Multiple approaches Explain, request approval
🟠 UNCERTAIN (40-59%) Significant tradeoffs Present options
🔴 UNCLEAR (<40%) Missing info Ask first

Risk adjustments:

  • DESTRUCTIVE: -15%
  • IRREVERSIBLE: -25%
  • SECURITY: -20%
  • TESTED: +15%
  • REVERSIBLE: +10%

3. STOP Triggers

Hard stops requiring human decision:

Category Examples
Security API keys, auth logic, encryption
Destructive DELETE, DROP, bulk removal
Irreversible Schema migrations, renaming
Financial Payment code, pricing logic

When triggered: Signal 🔴 UNCLEAR, explain risk, present 2-3 options, wait.

4. Session Logs

Per-task action tracing. One file per task.

Pattern: docs/sessions/SES-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN.md

Format:

# Session Log: SES-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Agent:** [Agent Name]

## Actions

| Action | Confidence | Decisions | Files |
|--------|------------|-----------|-------|
| Added feature X | 🟢 | [DEC-001] | file.py |

Rules:

  • One file per task (never append)
  • Sequential numbering: 001, 002, 003...
  • Merge to *-recap.md daily
  • For history: read only recap files

Pre-flight Protocol

Before any significant action:

☐ DECISION_MEMORY.md read this session?
  - NO → Read it now
  - YES → Proceed
☐ Relevant [DEC-XXX] constraints?
  - YES → Cite: "Implementing per [DEC-XXX]"
  - CONFLICTS → STOP, flag to human
☐ STOP trigger category?
  - Security / Destructive / Irreversible / Financial → 🔴 → Options → Wait
☐ Confidence signaled?

Multi-Agent Coordination

Agents share context via files:

File Who Writes Who Reads
docs/DECISION_MEMORY.md Human + Agents All agents
docs/sessions/SES-*.md Each agent All (recaps only)
CLAUDE.md / rules file Human All agents

When to Create a Decision

Create a decision when:

  • Choice affects multiple files/features
  • Choice will recur in future sessions
  • Choice has alternatives with different tradeoffs
  • Confidence < 80% on architectural choice
  • Same question asked 2+ times

Decision proposal format:

PROPOSED DECISION:
Category: [ARCHITECTURE | TECHNOLOGY | PATTERN | POLICY]
Title: [Short imperative phrase]
Context: [What prompted this]
Decision: [What you're proposing]
Rationale: [Why this choice]
Consequences: [What this constrains]

Decision Categories

Category When to Use
ARCHITECTURE System structure, component boundaries
TECHNOLOGY Tool/library/service choices
PATTERN Recurring implementation approaches
POLICY Business rules, compliance requirements

Session Log Lifecycle

Task starts → Create SES-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN.md
During task → Log actions to table
Task ends → Add Handoff section

End of day → Merge sessions to SES-YYYY-MM-DD-recap.md
End of month → Merge recaps to SES-YYYY-MM-rollup.md

Retention:

  • Session files: Keep 7 days
  • Daily recaps: Keep 30 days
  • Monthly rollups: Keep indefinitely

Resources

  • Templates: See assets/ for ready-to-use templates
    • DECISION_MEMORY_TEMPLATE.md
    • AGENT_RULES_TEMPLATE.md
    • SESSION_LOG_TEMPLATE.md
    • SESSION_RECAP_TEMPLATE.md

Validation Checklist

After implementing, verify:

  • Agent reads DECISION_MEMORY.md before changes
  • Agent cites decisions as [DEC-XXX]
  • Agent signals confidence at response start
  • STOP triggers halt dangerous operations
  • Session logs created per task (not appended)

Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't ✅ Do Instead Why
Skip reading Decision Memory Always read at session start Constraints get violated
Append to existing session file Create new file per task Loses task boundaries
Signal confidence after action Signal at START of response Too late to adjust
Make decisions without [DEC-XXX] Propose for Decision Memory Next session forgets
Include timestamps in logs Use sequential numbering LLMs unreliable at time

Related

  • Stream Coding Stack — Integrated methodology
  • Stream Coding — Documentation-first development
  • Clarity Gate — Epistemic verification

Version: 1.0 Author: Francesco Marinoni Moretto License: CC BY 4.0