| name | decision-toolkit |
| description | Generate structured decision-making tools — step-by-step guides, bias checkers, scenario explorers, and interactive dashboards. Use when facing significant choices requiring systematic analysis. Supports multiple cognitive styles and output formats. |
Decision Toolkit
Overview
Create structured decision support materials that help humans think through significant choices systematically. This skill produces interactive tools, not just analysis — empowering the decision-maker rather than deciding for them.
Philosophy
Principles
- Guide, don't decide — Tools illuminate the decision space; humans choose
- One thing at a time — Reduce cognitive load through progressive disclosure
- Multiple lenses — Same decision viewed through different frameworks reveals blind spots
- Biases visible — Make cognitive biases explicit and checkable
- Actionable output — End with concrete next steps, not abstract conclusions
Accessibility First
- Support screen readers (semantic HTML, ARIA labels)
- Keyboard navigable (tab order, focus states)
- High contrast by default (WCAG AA minimum)
- Reduced motion option
- Works without JavaScript (graceful degradation)
- Mobile-friendly touch targets (44px minimum)
Cognitive Inclusivity
Different people process decisions differently:
| Style | Accommodation |
|---|---|
| Analytical | Numbers, matrices, weighted scores |
| Intuitive | Gut-check prompts, "how does this feel?" |
| Visual | Diagrams, progress bars, color coding |
| Verbal | Written summaries, question prompts |
| Sequential | Step-by-step wizard flow |
| Global | Dashboard overview option |
When to Use
Invoke this skill when user faces:
- Collaboration/partnership decisions
- Career or job changes
- Investment of significant time/money
- Project prioritization
- Technology/tool selection
- Any choice with multiple factors and uncertainty
Not for: Trivial decisions, emergency responses, or when user just needs information.
Decision Types
Type 1: Opportunity Evaluation
Should I pursue this opportunity?
- Partnership, job offer, investment, project
Type 2: Resource Allocation
Where should I invest my time/money/attention?
- Prioritization, budgeting, focus areas
Type 3: Risk Assessment
What could go wrong and is it worth it?
- New ventures, changes, experiments
Type 4: Trade-off Navigation
Which option among alternatives?
- Tool selection, hire decisions, strategic choices
The Decision Journey
Nine steps, each focused on one dimension:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. CONTEXT What is the decision? │
│ 2. FIRST PRINCIPLES Does this solve a real problem? │
│ 3. TIMING Is now the right moment? │
│ 4. STAKEHOLDERS Who else is involved? Are they stable? │
│ 5. BIASES What might cloud my judgment? │
│ 6. OPPORTUNITY COST What am I giving up? │
│ 7. SCENARIOS What could happen? │
│ 8. QUESTIONS What do I still need to learn? │
│ 9. SYNTHESIS Summary + decision │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Output Formats
1. Interactive HTML Guide (Primary)
Step-by-step wizard with:
- Progress indicator
- One question per screen
- State persistence across steps
- Final summary aggregating all inputs
- Keyboard navigation
- Print-friendly CSS
2. Markdown Framework
For offline/text-based use:
- Structured prompts
- Checkbox-style bias audit
- Fill-in-the-blank templates
3. Voice Summary
For audio consumption:
- 5-7 paragraph executive summary
- Orpheus TTS markup for emotional texture
- Key decision + rationale
4. PDF Report
For documentation/sharing:
- Professional formatting
- All frameworks applied
- Appendix with raw analysis
Frameworks Reference
First Principles Test
1. What problem does this solve?
2. Can I solve it myself?
3. Is this the best solution?
4. What assumptions am I making?
5. If starting fresh today, would I choose this?
Bias Checklist
□ FOMO — Am I afraid of missing out?
□ Sunk Cost — Am I factoring past investment?
□ Authority — Am I deferring to credentials?
□ Social Proof — Am I following the crowd?
□ Commitment — Do I feel locked in by past statements?
□ Optimism — Am I assuming problems will resolve?
□ Recency — Am I overweighting recent events?
□ Confirmation — Am I seeking validating info only?
□ Shiny Object — Is novelty distracting me?
□ Loss Aversion — Am I overweighting potential losses?
Opportunity Cost Calculator
Hours/week × Weeks × Hourly rate = Direct cost
+ What else could those hours produce?
+ What relationships/opportunities might suffer?
= True opportunity cost
Scenario Matrix
| Scenario | Probability | Outcome | Expected Value |
|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| Worst | X% | ... | ... |
| Bad | X% | ... | ... |
| Neutral | X% | ... | ... |
| Good | X% | ... | ... |
| Best | X% | ... | ... |
Pre-mortem
Imagine it's [future date]. This decision failed. Why?
Possible causes:
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...
Which causes are within my control?
Which warning signs should I watch for?
10-10-10 Framework
How will I feel about this decision in:
- 10 minutes?
- 10 months?
- 10 years?
Regret Minimization
Imagine you're 80 looking back.
Would you regret doing this?
Would you regret NOT doing this?
Implementation Guide
Step 1: Gather Context
Ask user for:
- What is the decision?
- What are the options?
- What's the timeline?
- What's at stake?
- Any relevant background?
Or extract from existing documents (meeting transcripts, notes).
Step 2: Choose Output Format
Based on user preference and context:
- Complex decision + time available → Interactive HTML
- Quick analysis → Markdown framework
- On-the-go consumption → Voice summary
- Need to share with others → PDF report
Step 3: Generate Tool
Use templates in templates/ directory:
decision-guide-template.html— Full interactive wizarddecision-framework.md— Text-based analysisdecision-voice-summary.md— Audio script template
Step 4: Customize
Replace placeholders:
{{DECISION_TITLE}}— What's being decided{{CONTEXT}}— Background information{{OPTIONS}}— Available choices{{STAKEHOLDERS}}— People/teams involved{{TIMELINE}}— Relevant dates{{FACTORS}}— Key evaluation criteria
Step 5: Apply Branding (Optional)
If using Agency brand:
- Import brand-agency skill CSS variables
- Use neobrutalism styling
- Apply Geist/EB Garamond typography
Accessibility Implementation
Semantic HTML
<main role="main" aria-label="Decision Guide">
<nav aria-label="Progress">
<ol role="list">...</ol>
</nav>
<section aria-labelledby="step-title">
<h1 id="step-title">...</h1>
</section>
</main>
Keyboard Navigation
// Ensure all interactive elements are focusable
// Tab order follows visual order
// Enter/Space activate buttons
// Arrow keys navigate options
Screen Reader Announcements
<div role="status" aria-live="polite" id="announcer">
<!-- Announce step changes, selections, results -->
</div>
Color Contrast
/* Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text */
--text-on-light: #000000; /* 21:1 on white */
--text-on-dark: #ffffff; /* 21:1 on black */
--text-on-primary: #ffffff; /* Check each color */
Reduced Motion
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
* {
animation: none !important;
transition: none !important;
}
}
Cultural Considerations
Individualist Framing
- "What do YOU want?"
- Personal goals and values
- Individual opportunity cost
Collectivist Framing
- "How does this affect your team/family?"
- Relationship implications
- Group harmony considerations
Power Distance Awareness
- Some cultures defer to authority figures
- Bias check should include "Am I deferring inappropriately?"
- Include stakeholder perspectives explicitly
Uncertainty Tolerance
- Some prefer detailed scenario analysis
- Others find it anxiety-inducing
- Offer both detailed and simplified views
Example Invocations
From Meeting Transcript
User: Analyze this meeting transcript and create a decision toolkit
Claude: [Extracts decision, stakeholders, options from transcript]
[Generates interactive HTML guide]
[Creates voice summary]
From Scratch
User: I need to decide whether to take a new job offer
Claude: [Asks clarifying questions]
[Generates decision framework]
[Customizes for career decision type]
Quick Analysis
User: Help me think through this partnership decision, just give me the frameworks
Claude: [Provides markdown framework]
[Skips interactive tool]
[Focuses on key questions]
Files
SKILL.md— This filetemplates/decision-guide-template.html— Interactive wizard templatetemplates/decision-framework.md— Text-based analysis templatetemplates/decision-voice-summary.md— Audio script templatereferences/bias-encyclopedia.md— Detailed bias descriptionsreferences/framework-deep-dives.md— Extended framework explanations
Integration
Works well with:
- brand-agency — Apply visual branding
- transcript-analyzer — Extract decisions from meetings
- pdf-generation — Create shareable reports
- elevenlabs-tts — Generate audio summaries
Learnings
2026-01-09
Context: Initial skill creation from Synthius decision session
Key Insight: Dashboard-everything-at-once overwhelms. Step-by-step wizard with one concept per screen dramatically improves usability.
Architecture: 9-step journey covering all major decision dimensions. State object persists selections across steps. Summary aggregates everything.
Accessibility Note: High contrast neobrutalism actually helps accessibility — clear borders, distinct states, no subtle gradients.