PRD-README v1 Standard

Product-Ready Documentation README standard for creating documentation that reliably produces correct adoption decisions, fast first success, low support burden, sustained trust, and low drift.

Core Definition

A README is "perfect" when it achieves:

1. Correct adoption decision - Reader quickly knows if project fits their needs
2. Fast first success - Copy/paste path to working result in under 5 minutes
3. Low support burden - Answers top questions upfront
4. Sustained trust - Clear status and quality signals
5. Low drift - Stays accurate via process/automation

The 9-Step Build Process

Follow these steps in order when creating or improving a README.

Step 0: Specify Target Reader and Job-to-be-Done

Before writing any README content, define these three lines:

Primary user: [e.g., "Python developer who wants an HTTP client library"]
Primary job: [e.g., "install → call API → handle auth"]
Success in 5 minutes: [e.g., "send one request and see JSON response"]

Failure to define these results in either a manifesto or an API dump.

Step 1: Engineer the Top Section (Above the Fold)

Goal: 15-30 seconds to decide whether to continue reading.

Include in this exact order:

1. # ProjectName
2. One-sentence value proposition: what it does + for whom + differentiator
3. Status line (mandatory): Status: active | beta | stable | deprecated | unmaintained
4. Primary links: docs, releases/changelog, issues/discussions/support
5. Badges (optional, limited): only build, version, license
6. One visual if product is visual (screenshot/GIF)

Rules:

• If first screen is 70% badges → conversion problem
• If status is unclear → trust problem

Step 2: Provide Executable Quickstart

Goal: First working result in under 5 minutes (TTFS - Time To First Success).

Quickstart must contain:

1. Prerequisites (explicit versions)
2. Install (one-liner if possible)
3. Run/Use (minimal example)
4. Expected output or "what success looks like"

Quality bar: A brand-new user copies and pastes commands with zero edits. If secrets required, point to .env.example with minimum required variables.

Step 3: Add Real Usage (2-4 Common Workflows)

Goal: Enable meaningful use beyond hello-world.

For each workflow include:

• Short explanation (1-3 sentences)
• Code/CLI block
• Pitfall note if common error exists

Structure:

• Common workflow 1 (most frequent)
• Common workflow 2 (second most frequent)
• Optional: Advanced workflow (link out if long)

Step 4: Progressive Disclosure

Goal: Keep README readable and maintainable.

README includes only the 80/20 (most common paths). Move deep details to:

• /docs/*
• CONFIGURATION.md
• ARCHITECTURE.md
• API.md
• Wiki/documentation site

Link to these clearly from README.

Step 5: Contributor Path

If accepting contributions:

• Add Contributing section linking to CONTRIBUTING.md
• Include dev setup: clone → install → test
• Mention code style/lint/test requirements

If not accepting contributions:

• State explicitly
• Explain how to report bugs or request changes

Step 6: Support Routes

Answer these questions:

• Where to ask questions (Issues vs Discussions vs chat)
• What info to include when filing a bug
• Response expectations (optional)

Step 7: Legal and Security

Make non-ambiguous:

• License: Name it and link to LICENSE
• Security: Link to SECURITY.md or provide reporting instructions

Mandatory for production adoption in organizations.

Step 8: Accessibility Requirements

Apply these checks:

• Headings follow strict hierarchy (# → ## → ###, no skipping)
• Every image has meaningful alt text
• Links are descriptive ("Contributing guidelines" not "click here")
• Short paragraphs and lists to reduce cognitive load
• Define acronyms on first use
• Avoid sarcasm/idioms that harm global readability

Step 9: Prevent Documentation Rot

Treat README like code with automation:

• Markdown lint (format consistency)
• Link checker (prevents link rot)
• Snippet testing (execute README code blocks when feasible)
• Quickstart CI smoke test (runs commands in clean environment)

Minimum: Monthly README validation workflow or validation on each release.

Standard Section Order

Use this skeleton unless there's a strong reason not to:

# Title

One-line value proposition

Status: [status] | [Docs](link) | [Releases](link) | [Support](link)

![optional screenshot](path)

## Why / Motivation (short)

## Quickstart
### Prerequisites
### Install
### Run
### Expected Result

## Usage
### Common Workflow 1
### Common Workflow 2

## Configuration

## Troubleshooting / FAQ

## Roadmap (optional)

## Contributing

## Support

## Security

## License

## Maintainers / Credits

Acceptance Tests

Run these 10 checks against any README. All must pass for "perfect" status:

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed guidance on specific aspects:

• references/codebase-analysis.md - How to analyze a codebase to auto-detect target reader and job-to-be-done
• references/audit-checklist.md - Detailed audit procedure with scoring

Using This Skill

For README generation:

1. Analyze codebase to determine Step 0 values
2. Follow 9-step process in order
3. Validate against 10 acceptance tests
4. Output README following standard section order

For README auditing:

1. Run 10 acceptance tests
2. Score each (pass/fail)
3. Identify specific issues
4. Provide prioritized fixes
5. Offer to auto-fix when requested