| name | Git Commit Helper |
| description | Generate descriptive commit messages by analyzing git diffs. Use when the user asks for help writing commit messages or reviewing staged changes. |
Git Commit Helper
Quick start
Analyze staged changes and generate commit message:
# View staged changes
git diff --staged
# Generate commit message based on changes
# (Claude will analyze the diff and suggest a message)
Commit message format
Follow conventional commits format:
<type>(<scope>): <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer]
Types
- feat: New feature
- fix: Bug fix
- docs: Documentation changes
- style: Code style changes (formatting, missing semicolons)
- refactor: Code refactoring
- test: Adding or updating tests
- chore: Maintenance tasks
Examples
Feature commit:
feat(auth): add JWT authentication
Implement JWT-based authentication system with:
- Login endpoint with token generation
- Token validation middleware
- Refresh token support
Bug fix:
fix(api): handle null values in user profile
Prevent crashes when user profile fields are null.
Add null checks before accessing nested properties.
Refactor:
refactor(database): simplify query builder
Extract common query patterns into reusable functions.
Reduce code duplication in database layer.
Analyzing changes
Review what's being committed:
# Show files changed
git status
# Show detailed changes
git diff --staged
# Show statistics
git diff --staged --stat
# Show changes for specific file
git diff --staged path/to/file
Commit message guidelines
DO:
- Use imperative mood ("add feature" not "added feature")
- Keep first line under 50 characters
- Capitalize first letter
- No period at end of summary
- Explain WHY not just WHAT in body
DON'T:
- Use vague messages like "update" or "fix stuff"
- Include technical implementation details in summary
- Write paragraphs in summary line
- Use past tense
Multi-file commits
When committing multiple related changes:
refactor(core): restructure authentication module
- Move auth logic from controllers to service layer
- Extract validation into separate validators
- Update tests to use new structure
- Add integration tests for auth flow
Breaking change: Auth service now requires config object
Scope examples
Frontend:
feat(ui): add loading spinner to dashboardfix(form): validate email format
Backend:
feat(api): add user profile endpointfix(db): resolve connection pool leak
Infrastructure:
chore(ci): update Node version to 20feat(docker): add multi-stage build
Breaking changes
Indicate breaking changes clearly:
feat(api)!: restructure API response format
BREAKING CHANGE: All API responses now follow JSON:API spec
Previous format:
{ "data": {...}, "status": "ok" }
New format:
{ "data": {...}, "meta": {...} }
Migration guide: Update client code to handle new response structure
Template workflow
- Review changes:
git diff --staged - Identify type: Is it feat, fix, refactor, etc.?
- Determine scope: What part of the codebase?
- Write summary: Brief, imperative description
- Add body: Explain why and what impact
- Note breaking changes: If applicable
Interactive commit helper
Use git add -p for selective staging:
# Stage changes interactively
git add -p
# Review what's staged
git diff --staged
# Commit with message
git commit -m "type(scope): description"
Amending commits
Fix the last commit message:
# Amend commit message only
git commit --amend
# Amend and add more changes
git add forgotten-file.js
git commit --amend --no-edit
Best practices
- Atomic commits - One logical change per commit
- Test before commit - Ensure code works
- Reference issues - Include issue numbers if applicable
- Keep it focused - Don't mix unrelated changes
- Write for humans - Future you will read this
Commit message checklist
- Type is appropriate (feat/fix/docs/etc.)
- Scope is specific and clear
- Summary is under 50 characters
- Summary uses imperative mood
- Body explains WHY not just WHAT
- Breaking changes are clearly marked
- Related issue numbers are included