Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Get quality code reviews from Claude Code - PR workflows, review prompts, checklists

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name code-review
description Get quality code reviews from Claude Code - PR workflows, review prompts, checklists
version 1.0.0
author Claude Code SDK
tags review, pr, quality, feedback

Code Review with Claude Code

Get thorough, actionable code reviews from Claude Code for any codebase.

Quick Reference

Review Type When to Use Prompt Pattern
General New features, refactors "Review @file for issues"
Security Auth, data handling "Security review @file"
Performance Hot paths, loops "Performance review @file"
Style Consistency, standards "Style review against @.eslintrc"
Architecture Design decisions "ultrathink about @src/module/"

Review Request Patterns

Basic Review

Review @src/api/users.ts for issues.

Focus on:
- Logic errors
- Edge cases
- Error handling
- Code clarity

Targeted Review

Review @src/auth/login.ts specifically for:
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Password handling
- Session management

Ignore styling issues.

Comparative Review

Review this change:
@git:diff src/api/

Compare against:
- Our patterns in @src/api/orders.ts
- Best practices for REST APIs

Review Types

Security Review

Security review @src/auth/ @src/api/

Check for:
- Input validation
- SQL injection
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Auth/authz issues
- Secrets exposure
- CSRF protection

Rate each finding: critical/high/medium/low

Performance Review

Performance review @src/services/search.ts

Analyze:
- Time complexity
- Memory usage
- Database queries (N+1?)
- Caching opportunities
- Async patterns

Style Review

Style review @src/components/ against:
@.eslintrc.js
@.prettierrc

Report:
- Naming conventions
- File organization
- Import ordering
- Component patterns

Architecture Review

ultrathink about the architecture of @src/orders/

Evaluate:
- Separation of concerns
- Dependency direction
- Coupling/cohesion
- Testability
- Extensibility

Getting Better Reviews

Provide Context

Include related files and history:

Review @src/api/payments.ts

Context:
- @src/types/payment.ts (types)
- @src/services/stripe.ts (integration)
- This replaces the old PayPal flow
- Must handle refunds within 30 days

Specify Your Concerns

Review @src/auth/session.ts

I'm specifically worried about:
1. Race conditions in token refresh
2. Session fixation attacks
3. Memory leaks from unclosed sessions

Less concerned about:
- Code style (will run linter)
- Test coverage (separate pass)

Request Actionable Feedback

Review @src/utils/parser.ts

For each issue found:
1. Explain the problem
2. Show the problematic code
3. Provide a fix
4. Rate severity

Review Output Format

Request structured output for complex reviews:

Review @src/api/ and format findings as:

## Critical
- [Issue]: [Location]: [Description]

## Improvements
- [Suggestion]: [Location]: [Benefit]

## Questions
- [Question]: [Context]

## Positive
- What's done well

Iterative Reviews

Multi-Pass Approach

# Pass 1: High-level
Review @src/orders/ for architectural issues.
Don't look at implementation details yet.

# Pass 2: After addressing Pass 1
Now review the implementation in @src/orders/service.ts
Focus on business logic correctness.

# Pass 3: Final
Security and performance review of @src/orders/

Review and Fix

Review @src/api/upload.ts for security issues.

For each critical issue:
1. Explain it
2. Fix it immediately
3. Add a test case

Thinking Keywords for Reviews

Keyword Review Type Example
think General review "think about issues in @file"
think harder Edge cases "think harder about edge cases"
ultrathink Security/arch "ultrathink about security of @auth/"
megathink Critical systems "megathink about @payment/ risks"

Review Checklists

Quick prompts for standard checks:

Run through @CHECKLIST.md for @src/api/users.ts

See CHECKLIST.md for complete checklists.

PR-Specific Reviews

Review PR #123

gh pr diff 123

Focus on:
- Does it match the PR description?
- Are tests adequate?
- Any breaking changes?
- Documentation updated?

See PR-WORKFLOWS.md for complete PR review workflows.

Review Comment Templates

Issue Found

Issue: [Brief description]
Location: [file:line]
Severity: [critical|high|medium|low]

Problem:
[Explanation of what's wrong]

Current:
[code snippet]

Suggested:
[fixed code snippet]

Why: [Reason this matters]

Suggestion

Suggestion: [Brief description]
Location: [file:line]
Impact: [performance|readability|maintainability]

Current approach:
[what code does now]

Alternative:
[better approach]

Benefit: [Why this is better]

Common Review Prompts

API Endpoint

Review @src/api/users.ts for:
- Input validation completeness
- Error response consistency
- Auth/authz checks
- Rate limiting consideration
- Logging adequacy

React Component

Review @src/components/UserCard.tsx for:
- Props validation
- Render optimization
- Hook usage
- Accessibility
- Error boundaries

Database Code

Review @src/repositories/user.ts for:
- SQL injection (even with ORM)
- N+1 query patterns
- Transaction handling
- Index usage
- Connection management

Utility Functions

Review @src/utils/validation.ts for:
- Edge case handling
- Type safety
- Error messages clarity
- Reusability
- Test coverage gaps

Reference Files

File Contents
REVIEW-PROMPTS.md Detailed prompts by review type
PR-WORKFLOWS.md Pull request review workflows
CHECKLIST.md Code review checklists

Validation

After a review, verify quality:

  • All critical issues addressed
  • Fixes don't introduce new issues
  • Tests added for bugs found
  • Review comments resolved
  • Code compiles and tests pass