Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Work on Ticket

@jjmartres/opencode
1
0

Fetches Jira ticket details, creates an appropriately named branch, and initiates the task planning workflow. Use when the user says "work on [TICKET_ID]" or similar phrases.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name Work on Ticket
description Fetches Jira ticket details, creates an appropriately named branch, and initiates the task planning workflow. Use when the user says "work on [TICKET_ID]" or similar phrases.
license MIT
compatibility opencode

Work on Ticket

Streamlined workflow to start work on a Jira ticket by fetching ticket details, creating a branch, and initiating task planning.

When to Use This Skill

Activate this skill when:

  • The user says "work on AGP-123" or "start work on AGP-123"
  • The user says "pick up AGP-123" or "begin AGP-123"
  • The user mentions starting work on a specific Jira ticket ID
  • Pattern: work on [TICKET_ID] or similar intent

Workflow

1. Parse Ticket ID

Extract the Jira ticket ID from the user's message. Common patterns:

  • work on AGP-782
  • start AGP-782
  • pick up PROJ-123

Ticket ID format: [A-Z]+-[0-9]+ (e.g., AGP-782, AICC-123)

2. Fetch Jira Ticket Details

Use the MCP Zapier tool to fetch the ticket:

mcp__zapier-frontend__jira_software_cloud_find_issue_by_key({
  instructions: "Get details for ticket [TICKET_ID]",
  key: "[TICKET_ID]",
  fields: "summary,description,issuetype,priority,status"
})

Extract from response:

  • Summary (title)
  • Description
  • Issue type
  • Status
  • Any other relevant context

3. Generate Branch Name

Create a branch name using this format:

[TICKET_ID]-[kebab-case-summary]

Branch Naming Rules:

  • Start with the ticket ID (e.g., AGP-782-)
  • Convert summary to kebab-case (lowercase, dashes instead of spaces)
  • Remove special characters
  • Keep it concise (max 50 characters total)
  • Use meaningful words from the summary

Examples:

  • AGP-782-migrate-existing-mcp-server
  • AICC-123-fix-auth-token-expiry
  • PROJ-456-add-user-settings-page

Implementation:

# Convert summary to kebab-case
# Example: "Migrate existing MCP server" -> "migrate-existing-mcp-server"

4. Check Current Git State

Before creating a branch, check the current state:

# Check current branch
git branch --show-current

# Check for uncommitted changes
git status --porcelain

If uncommitted changes exist:

  • STOP and inform User
  • Suggest: "You have uncommitted changes. Should I commit them first, stash them, or continue anyway?"
  • Wait for User's decision

If not on staging/main:

  • STOP and inform User
  • Suggest: "You're currently on branch [CURRENT_BRANCH]. Should I switch to staging first?"
  • Wait for User's decision

5. Create Branch

Once it's safe to proceed:

# Ensure we're on the latest staging
git checkout staging
git pull origin staging

# Create and checkout new branch
git checkout -b [TICKET_ID]-[kebab-case-summary]

Confirm to User: "Created and checked out branch: [BRANCH_NAME]"

6. Build Task Planning Prompt

Analyze the Jira ticket and create a comprehensive prompt for the /eng:chore command:

Prompt should include:

  • The ticket summary
  • Key details from the description
  • Any acceptance criteria mentioned
  • Relevant technical context

Example prompt construction:

Summary: [ticket.summary]

Description: [ticket.description]

Acceptance Criteria:
[extracted criteria if present]

7. Execute Task Planning

Run the /eng:chore slash command with the ticket number and constructed prompt:

/eng:chore [TICKET_ID] [CONSTRUCTED_PROMPT]

Example:

AGP-782 Migrate existing MCP server implementation to new architecture

Description: We need to refactor the MCP server to use the new modular architecture. This includes updating the tool registry, migrating existing tools, and ensuring backward compatibility.

Acceptance Criteria:
- All existing tools work with new architecture
- Tests pass
- No breaking changes to API

Error Handling

If ticket not found:

  • Inform User: "Couldn't find ticket [TICKET_ID] in Jira. Please check the ticket ID."
  • STOP - don't proceed with branch creation

If branch already exists:

  • Inform User: "Branch [BRANCH_NAME] already exists."
  • Ask: "Should I check it out, create a new branch with a different name, or stop?"
  • Wait for decision

If git operations fail:

  • Show the error to User
  • STOP - don't proceed to task planning

Example Usage

Example 1: Simple Ticket

User: "work on AGP-782"

Claude:

  1. Fetches AGP-782 from Jira
  2. Finds summary: "Migrate existing MCP server"
  3. Checks git state (clean, on staging)
  4. Creates branch: AGP-782-migrate-existing-mcp-server
  5. Runs: /eng:chore AGP-782 Migrate existing MCP server implementation...

Example 2: With Uncommitted Changes

User: "work on AICC-456"

Claude:

  1. Fetches AICC-456 from Jira
  2. Checks git state - finds uncommitted changes
  3. STOPS and asks: "You have uncommitted changes. Should I commit them first, stash them, or continue anyway?"
  4. Waits for User's decision

Example 3: Ticket Not Found

User: "work on BAD-999"

Claude:

  1. Tries to fetch BAD-999 from Jira
  2. Ticket not found
  3. Informs User: "Couldn't find ticket BAD-999 in Jira. Please check the ticket ID."
  4. STOPS

Coding Standards

CRITICAL RULE - NESTED CONDITIONALS:

  • NEVER EVER EVER USE NESTED CONDITIONALS when working on tickets
  • If you find yourself nesting if statements, STOP immediately
  • Refactor using early returns, guard clauses, or extract functions
  • This rule applies to all code written while working on any ticket
  • Violation of this rule is FAILURE

Why this matters:

  • Nested conditionals reduce readability and increase cognitive load
  • They make code harder to test and maintain
  • Early returns and guard clauses are always clearer

Instead of:

if (condition1) {
  if (condition2) {
    // do something
  }
}

Do this:

if (!condition1) return;
if (!condition2) return;
// do something

CRITICAL RULE - NO UNNECESSARY INLINE COMMENTS:

  • NEVER add simple, obvious inline comments that just restate what the code does
  • Code should be self-documenting through clear variable names, function names, and structure
  • Only add comments when they explain WHY something is done, not WHAT is being done
  • Remove unnecessary comments during refactoring
  • This rule applies to all code written while working on any ticket
  • Violation of this rule is FAILURE

Bad comments (obvious, unnecessary):

// Set the user's name
user.name = "Alice";

// Loop through the items
for (const item of items) {
  // Process the item
  processItem(item);
}

// Return true if valid
return isValid;

Good comments (explain WHY, add context):

// Cache user data for 5 minutes to reduce API calls
const cachedUser = await cache.get(userId, { ttl: 300 });

// Process items in batches to avoid memory issues with large datasets
for (const batch of chunkArray(items, 100)) {
  await processBatch(batch);
}

// Skip validation for admin users per security requirement SEC-123
if (user.isAdmin) return true;

When comments ARE appropriate:

  • Explaining non-obvious business logic or requirements
  • Documenting workarounds for external bugs (with issue links)
  • Clarifying performance optimizations
  • Noting security considerations
  • Referencing ticket numbers or external documentation

When to use NO comments:

  • If the code is self-explanatory
  • If a better variable/function name would make it clear
  • If the comment just repeats what the code obviously does

CRITICAL RULE - VITEST TESTING:

  • ALWAYS use the Vitest TDD Expert skill when writing or working with Vitest tests
  • Before writing any Vitest tests, activate the Vitest TDD Expert skill by invoking it with the Skill tool
  • The Vitest TDD Expert skill enforces:
    • Red-Green-Refactor TDD cycle (test first, always)
    • 95%+ coverage requirements with quality metrics
    • FIRST principles (Fast, Independent, Repeatable, Self-validating, Timely)
    • Behavior-focused testing (not implementation details)
    • Comprehensive edge case coverage and error path testing
    • Anti-pattern avoidance (no brittle tests, no excessive mocking)
  • This ensures high-quality, maintainable test suites that provide confidence
  • Violation of this rule means tests may be brittle, incomplete, or low quality

When to activate Vitest TDD Expert:

// Before writing Vitest tests, invoke:
Skill({ skill: "vitest-tdd" })

Important Notes

  • Always check git state before creating branches
  • Never force-create branches or overwrite existing branches
  • Never proceed if there are uncommitted changes without User's approval
  • Keep branch names concise - aim for clarity over completeness
  • Include ticket context in the task planning prompt to give the planner maximum context
  • The /eng:chore command will handle the detailed planning - this skill just sets up the environment

Success Criteria

The skill is successful when:

  1. ✅ Jira ticket is fetched successfully
  2. ✅ Appropriate branch name is generated
  3. ✅ Git state is verified (no uncommitted changes or user approved)
  4. ✅ New branch is created and checked out
  5. /eng:chore command is executed with ticket context
  6. ✅ User is informed of each major step