Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

finishing-a-development-branch

@krzemienski/shannon-framework
1
0

Use at development completion - guides branch integration with Shannon 3-tier validation (0.00-1.00 readiness score), MCP merge pattern analysis, and Serena risk assessment

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name finishing-a-development-branch
description Use at development completion - guides branch integration with Shannon 3-tier validation (0.00-1.00 readiness score), MCP merge pattern analysis, and Serena risk assessment

Finishing a Development Branch (Shannon-Enhanced)

Overview

Structured branch completion with quantitative readiness validation.

Verify → 3-tier validation → Present options → Execute → Cleanup.

Shannon enhancement: Numerical readiness scoring, merge pattern analysis via MCP, Serena risk assessment.

Readiness Score (0.00-1.00):

  • 0.00-0.60: Not ready (tests failing, validation incomplete)
  • 0.61-0.80: Mostly ready (minor issues, could proceed carefully)
  • 0.81-0.95: Ready (validates on all tiers, low risk)
  • 0.96-1.00: Excellent (perfect readiness)

The 3-Tier Validation

Tier 1: Test Validation

# Run full test suite
readiness_score_tier1 = 0.0

if test_suite_passes:
  readiness_score_tier1 = 1.0
  log to Serena: {test_count, coverage_pct, duration}
else:
  readiness_score_tier1 = (tests_passed / total_tests)
  log failures: "[list failing tests]"
  STOP: Cannot proceed with Tiers 2-3

GATE: If Tier 1 < 0.90, must fix before continuing.

Tier 2: Code Quality Validation

# Metrics gathering (Serena)
code_quality = {
  files_modified: count,
  lines_added: count,
  lines_deleted: count,
  commits: count,
  test_coverage_change: delta_pct
}

# MCP pattern analysis: compare to historical merges
pattern_match = compare_to_historical_merges({
  scope_size: files_modified,
  change_magnitude: lines_added,
  test_coverage_delta: coverage_change
})

readiness_score_tier2 = pattern_match.risk_assessment_inverse
# 1.0 = safe pattern, 0.0 = high-risk pattern

Log to Serena:
  historical_similar_merges: N (count)
  avg_merge_success_rate: X.XX (from history)
  risk_level: "low|medium|high"

GATE: If Tier 2 < 0.75, alert but can override.

Tier 3: Integration Readiness

# Final checklist validation
integration_checks = {
  base_branch_exists: bool,          # +0.1
  branch_synced_with_base: bool,     # +0.2
  no_conflicting_changes: bool,      # +0.3
  commit_messages_compliant: bool,   # +0.2
  no_breaking_changes_detected: bool # +0.2
}

readiness_score_tier3 = sum(passing_checks) / total_checks
# Range: 0.0-1.0

GATE: If Tier 3 < 0.80, prompt for manual fixes.

Overall Readiness Calculation

readiness_score = (
  readiness_score_tier1 * 0.5 +  # Tests are mandatory
  readiness_score_tier2 * 0.25 + # Code quality important
  readiness_score_tier3 * 0.25   # Integration critical
)

Range: 0.00-1.00

Interpretation:

  • < 0.80: NOT READY - Fix before continuing
  • 0.80-0.89: PROCEED CAREFULLY - Flag potential issues
  • 0.90+: READY - Safe to merge/PR

Process Steps

Step 1: Tier 1 Verification (Test Validation)

# Run project's full test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests_fail:
  readiness_score = test_pass_rate
  Report: "[N failing tests]"
  STOP - Cannot proceed to Tiers 2-3
Else:
  readiness_score_tier1 = 1.0
  Continue to Tier 2

Step 2: Tier 2 Validation (Code Quality)

# MCP pattern analysis
git diff base_branch...HEAD | MCP analyze
  scope_size: files_modified count
  magnitude: lines_added + lines_deleted
  coverage: test coverage delta

# Serena historical comparison
Find similar merges in history
  readiness_score_tier2 = inverse(risk_score)

Log alert if tier2 < 0.75

Step 3: Tier 3 Validation (Integration Readiness)

# Base branch check
git merge-base HEAD main || git merge-base HEAD master

# Sync check
git status | grep "ahead|behind"

# Conflict check
git merge --no-commit --no-ff base_branch

# Commit message check (conventional commits)
git log base_branch...HEAD --format="%B"

# Calculate tier3_score from checks

Step 4: Calculate Overall Readiness & Present Options

Overall readiness_score = [calculated above]

If readiness_score >= 0.90:
  "✓ READY TO INTEGRATE"
Else:
  "⚠ CAUTION NEEDED [score: X.XX]"
  Alert on which tier failed

Present 4 options:
  1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
  2. Push and create a Pull Request
  3. Keep the branch as-is
  4. Discard this work

Step 5: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
<test-command>  # Re-verify Tier 1
git branch -d <feature-branch>
# Cleanup worktree

Option 2: Push and Create PR

git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# Create PR with readiness_score in description
gh pr create --title "[readiness: X.XX] Title" \
  --body "Readiness: Tier1=X.XX Tier2=X.XX Tier3=X.XX"
# Keep worktree

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch. Readiness: X.XX"
# Don't cleanup

Option 4: Discard

# Confirm first (typed confirmation: "discard")
git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>
# Cleanup worktree

Metrics Checklist

  • Tier 1: readiness_score_tier1 calculated (tests pass/fail)
  • Tier 2: MCP pattern analysis, Serena risk assessment done
  • Tier 3: Integration checks passed
  • Overall readiness_score calculated (0.00-1.00)
  • Score > 0.80 for safe merge/PR
  • Choice executed correctly
  • Worktree cleanup done (Options 1, 4 only)

Common Mistakes

❌ Skip test verification ✅ Always Tier 1 first

❌ Merge with failing tests ✅ Tier 1 must be 1.0

❌ Ignore readiness_score ✅ Alert if score < 0.90

❌ Force push without reason ✅ Only if explicitly requested

Serena Pattern Learning

Track across all branches:

  • Historical readiness_score distributions
  • Correlation between Tier 2 risk and actual merge issues
  • Which code patterns correlate with merge problems
  • Average readiness by change size/scope

Use to improve future predictions.

Integration

Called by:

  • subagent-driven-development (after all tasks complete)
  • executing-plans (after all batches complete)

Pairs with:

  • using-git-worktrees (cleans up worktree)

Real-World Impact

Example branch completion:

  • Tier 1: 0.99 (1 flaky test, 98 pass)
  • Tier 2: 0.82 (moderate scope, similar history)
  • Tier 3: 0.95 (clean integration)
  • readiness_score: 0.92 ✓ Safe to merge
  • Historical pattern matched 4 similar merges (100% success)