| name | study-planner |
| description | Standards for conducting deep, rigorous learning sessions to achieve mastery. Focuses on Feynman Technique, Break & Fix methodology, and practical implementation. |
Study Planner Standards (Deep Mastery)
Purpose
To transform passive information consumption into active, verified knowledge mastery. This standard enforces a rigorous cycle of explanation, experimentation, and implementation.
Core Philosophy: "Deep Work Only"
We do not support "skimming" or "quick summaries". If you are using this planner, you are committing to fully understanding the topic.
Mandatory Strategies
1. 🗣️ Feynman Technique (Concept Verification)
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."
- The Rule: You must explain the concept in simple language, without using jargon.
- The Test: If you cannot explain it to a 6-year-old (or a non-technical peer), you don't understand it.
- Artifact: Every session must produce a "Plain English Summary" in your notes.
2. 🔨 Break & Fix (Practical Verification)
"You don't know it until you break it."
- Action: Never just run example code.
- Step 1 (Break): Intentionally modify variables, logic, or configurations to cause errors.
- Step 2 (Analyze): Predict the error message before running.
- Step 3 (Fix): Restore functionality and document why it broke.
- Log: You must maintain a
troubleshooting_logfor every session.
3. 🏗️ Implementation First (Output)
"Code over Concepts."
- Artifact: Passive reading is not counted as progress. You must produce one of:
- A working script/notebook.
- A diagram drawn from scratch.
- A mini-project.
Quality Gate
Before marking a session as "Complete", you must verify:
- Feynman Summary: Is the summary jargon-free?
- Break Log: Did you break the code at least once?
- Implementation: Is there runnable code or a concrete artifact?
- Quiz: Did you create and solve at least 3 self-test questions?