Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for marketing challenges including campaign complexity (simplification cascades), creative blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring campaign patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), audience scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from proven problem-solving frameworks adapted for marketing execution.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name problem-solving
description Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for marketing challenges including campaign complexity (simplification cascades), creative blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring campaign patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), audience scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from proven problem-solving frameworks adapted for marketing execution.

Marketing Problem-Solving

Systematic techniques for solving complex marketing challenges, breaking through creative blocks, and optimizing campaigns.

Language & Quality Standards

CRITICAL: Respond in the same language the user is using. If Vietnamese, respond in Vietnamese. If Spanish, respond in Spanish.

Standards: Token efficiency, sacrifice grammar for concision, list unresolved questions at end.


When to Use This Skill

Apply problem-solving techniques when facing:

  • Campaign Complexity Spirals - Campaign keeps adding features/channels, becoming unwieldy
  • Creative Innovation Blocks - Stuck in conventional approaches, need breakthrough ideas
  • Recurring Campaign Patterns - Same issues appearing across multiple campaigns
  • Assumption Constraints - Limited by industry "truths" or conventional wisdom
  • Audience Scale Uncertainty - Unclear how strategy scales from niche to mass market
  • General Stuckness - Progress halted, unclear how to move forward

Core Techniques

1. Simplification Cascades

Problem: Campaign complexity spiraling out of control

When to use:

  • Campaign has too many channels, messages, or touchpoints
  • Team overwhelmed by execution complexity
  • Budget spread too thin across tactics
  • Message diluted across too many variations

How it works:

  1. List all campaign elements (channels, messages, segments, assets)
  2. Identify the 20% that drives 80% of results
  3. Ruthlessly cut the rest
  4. Reassess and repeat if still complex

Marketing example:

Problem: Product launch campaign across 8 channels, 15 assets, 4 segments
↓ Simplification Round 1
Focus: Top 3 channels (email, LinkedIn, blog), 6 core assets, 2 key segments
↓ Simplification Round 2
Core: Email + LinkedIn, 3 assets (landing page, case study, email sequence), 1 primary segment
Result: Focused execution, better results, manageable workload

See: ./references/simplification-cascades.md


2. Collision-Zone Thinking

Problem: Creative blocks, conventional approaches not working

When to use:

  • Campaign ideas feel generic or uninspired
  • Competitor campaigns all look similar
  • Need differentiation and breakthrough positioning
  • Stuck in industry best practices that don't work

How it works:

  1. Identify two unrelated domains/industries
  2. Force collision: "What if [industry A] met [industry B]?"
  3. Extract unexpected insights
  4. Apply to your marketing challenge

Marketing example:

Challenge: B2B SaaS email campaign feels boring
Collision: "What if enterprise software marketing met sneaker drops?"
Insights: Scarcity, hype, exclusive access, community building
Application: Limited beta access campaign, waitlist with perks, exclusive Slack community
Result: 3x higher engagement, viral social sharing

See: ./references/collision-zone-thinking.md


3. Meta-Pattern Recognition

Problem: Same issues recurring across campaigns

When to use:

  • Different campaigns failing in similar ways
  • Repeated performance issues across channels
  • Team making same mistakes
  • Need to identify root cause vs symptoms

How it works:

  1. Document 3+ instances of similar failures
  2. Look for deeper pattern beneath surface issues
  3. Address root cause, not symptoms
  4. Create system to prevent recurrence

Marketing example:

Surface problems:
- Email campaign: Low open rates
- Social campaign: Low engagement
- Content campaign: Low traffic

Meta-pattern discovered: Weak audience understanding
Root cause: No buyer persona research or validation
Solution: Comprehensive persona development process
Prevention: Mandatory persona validation before any campaign

See: ./references/meta-pattern-recognition.md


4. Inversion Exercise

Problem: Constrained by industry assumptions or "best practices"

When to use:

  • Conventional approaches failing
  • Industry "rules" limiting creativity
  • Need to challenge assumptions
  • Market leader doing opposite of conventional wisdom

How it works:

  1. State current assumption: "We must do X"
  2. Invert it: "What if we did the opposite of X?"
  3. Explore inverted scenario seriously
  4. Identify valid insights from inversion

Marketing example:

Assumption: "We must build email list before launching"
Inversion: "What if we launched with zero email list?"
Exploration: Focus on virality, referrals, paid acquisition, partnerships
Insight: Email list might be vanity metric; focus on product-led growth
Result: Skip content marketing, invest in product experience and referral program

See: ./references/inversion-exercise.md


5. Scale Game

Problem: Uncertain how strategy scales across audience sizes

When to use:

  • Unclear if niche strategy works at scale
  • Planning market expansion
  • Pivot from early adopters to mainstream
  • Budget allocation across segments uncertain

How it works:

  1. Test strategy at 10x smaller scale
  2. Test strategy at 10x larger scale
  3. Identify what breaks at each scale
  4. Design for actual scale, not current size

Marketing example:

Current: 100 customers via founder-led sales

10x smaller (10 customers):
- Works: Personal outreach, custom demos, high-touch
- Breaks: Can't justify any paid marketing

10x larger (1,000 customers):
- Works: Content marketing, paid ads, self-service onboarding
- Breaks: Founder-led sales, custom demos

10x larger again (10,000 customers):
- Works: Product-led growth, brand awareness, partnerships
- Breaks: Content marketing bandwidth, ad costs unsustainable

Insight: At 100→1,000, invest in content + paid ads + self-service
Don't optimize for 10 or 10,000; build for 1,000

See: ./references/scale-game.md


6. When Stuck Protocol

Problem: Progress completely halted, don't know next step

When to use:

  • Campaign stalled with no clear path forward
  • Team disagrees on approach
  • Overwhelmed by options or complexity
  • Decision paralysis

How it works:

  1. Zoom out: What's the actual goal? (Often forgot amid tactics)
  2. Constraint: What if you had 1 day and $100? (Forces prioritization)
  3. Naïve question: What would a beginner do? (Often surprisingly insightful)
  4. Ship smallest: What's the absolute minimum to test hypothesis?

Marketing example:

Stuck: Launching new product, paralyzed by marketing plan complexity

Zoom out: Goal = validate market demand + get 10 paying customers

Constraint: 1 day + $100 budget
- Can't build full funnel
- Can't create 50 assets
- Focus: Simple landing page + $100 LinkedIn ads

Naïve approach: "Just tell people about it"
- Direct outreach to 50 ideal customers
- Simple email explaining value

Ship smallest: Landing page + email to 50 prospects + $100 ads
Result: 3 sales in week 1, validated demand, iterate from there

See: ./references/when-stuck.md


Problem-Solving Workflow

Step 1: Identify Problem Type

  • Complexity spiral? → Simplification Cascades
  • Creative block? → Collision-Zone Thinking
  • Recurring pattern? → Meta-Pattern Recognition
  • Assumption constraint? → Inversion Exercise
  • Scale uncertainty? → Scale Game
  • Completely stuck? → When Stuck Protocol

Step 2: Apply Technique

  • Follow structured process for chosen technique
  • Document insights and findings
  • Validate assumptions with data/research

Step 3: Implement Solution

  • Create action plan from insights
  • Test solution at small scale first
  • Measure results and iterate

Step 4: Capture Learning

  • Document problem + solution for future reference
  • Share with team to build knowledge base
  • Update campaign playbooks with insights

Integration with Marketing Workflow

Use problem-solving techniques at these key moments:

Planning Phase:

  • Scale Game: Validate strategy for target audience size
  • Inversion Exercise: Challenge conventional approaches

Execution Phase:

  • Simplification Cascades: Cut scope when overwhelmed
  • When Stuck Protocol: Unblock campaign development

Optimization Phase:

  • Meta-Pattern Recognition: Identify recurring issues
  • Collision-Zone Thinking: Generate breakthrough ideas

Review Phase:

  • Document learnings for future campaigns
  • Update problem-solving playbook

Reference Materials

All techniques detailed in ./references/:

  • simplification-cascades.md - Reducing campaign complexity
  • collision-zone-thinking.md - Breaking creative blocks
  • meta-pattern-recognition.md - Finding root causes
  • inversion-exercise.md - Challenging assumptions
  • scale-game.md - Planning for audience scale
  • when-stuck.md - Unblocking progress
  • attribution.md - Framework origins and credits

Quick Reference

Complexity overwhelm? → Simplification Cascades (cut to 20% that matters) Creative stuck? → Collision-Zone Thinking (force unexpected combinations) Same problems repeating? → Meta-Pattern Recognition (find root cause) Best practices failing? → Inversion Exercise (try opposite approach) Scaling unclear? → Scale Game (test at 10x/0.1x scale) Completely blocked? → When Stuck Protocol (zoom out, constrain, ship smallest)


Remember: These techniques are tools, not rules. Mix and combine as needed. The goal is breakthrough thinking and unblocked execution, not perfect methodology.