| name | deep-research |
| description | Expert deep research including multi-source verification, fact-checking, and comprehensive analysis |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | USER |
| tags | research, deep-research, fact-checking, multi-source, analysis |
Deep Research
Purpose
Conduct comprehensive research using multiple sources, cross-verification, and systematic analysis to provide accurate, well-sourced information.
Activation Keywords
- deep research, comprehensive research
- fact check, verify, validate
- multi-source, cross-reference
- investigate, analyze thoroughly
- research report, findings
Core Capabilities
1. Multi-Source Research
- Web search aggregation
- Academic sources
- Official documentation
- Expert opinions
- Primary sources
2. Verification
- Cross-reference facts
- Source credibility assessment
- Bias detection
- Recency validation
- Citation tracking
3. Analysis
- Pattern identification
- Trend analysis
- Gap detection
- Contradiction resolution
- Synthesis
4. Documentation
- Structured findings
- Source attribution
- Confidence levels
- Limitations noted
- Actionable insights
5. Quality Assurance
- Fact accuracy check
- Source diversity
- Completeness assessment
- Objectivity review
Research Methodology
1. Define Scope
→ Clear research questions
→ Success criteria
→ Time/depth constraints
2. Gather Sources
→ Primary sources (official docs, APIs)
→ Secondary sources (articles, reports)
→ Tertiary sources (summaries, reviews)
→ Minimum 5+ independent sources
3. Verify & Cross-Reference
→ Fact triangulation
→ Date verification
→ Author credibility
→ Source independence
4. Analyze & Synthesize
→ Pattern extraction
→ Contradiction resolution
→ Gap identification
→ Insight generation
5. Document Findings
→ Executive summary
→ Detailed findings
→ Source citations
→ Confidence ratings
→ Limitations
Source Credibility Matrix
| Source Type |
Credibility |
Use Case |
| Official docs |
High |
Technical facts |
| Peer-reviewed |
High |
Scientific claims |
| Industry reports |
Medium-High |
Market data |
| News outlets |
Medium |
Current events |
| Blogs/Forums |
Low-Medium |
Community sentiment |
| Social media |
Low |
Trend indicators |
Research Report Template
# Research Report: [Topic]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview]
## Key Findings
1. [Finding with source]
2. [Finding with source]
3. [Finding with source]
## Detailed Analysis
### [Subtopic 1]
[Analysis with citations]
### [Subtopic 2]
[Analysis with citations]
## Sources
- [Source 1] - [Credibility: High/Medium/Low]
- [Source 2] - [Credibility: High/Medium/Low]
## Confidence Assessment
- Overall: [High/Medium/Low]
- Areas of uncertainty: [List]
## Limitations
- [Limitation 1]
- [Limitation 2]
## Recommendations
1. [Actionable recommendation]
2. [Actionable recommendation]
Example Usage
User: "Research the current state of WebAssembly adoption"
Deep Research Response:
1. Define scope
- Adoption metrics
- Use cases
- Browser support
- Performance benchmarks
2. Sources gathered (7)
- WebAssembly.org (official)
- MDN Web Docs
- State of JS 2024 survey
- GitHub usage statistics
- Browser release notes
- Industry case studies
- Performance benchmarks
3. Key findings
- 95%+ browser support
- Growing in serverless
- Primary use: performance-critical
- Major adopters: Figma, Google Earth
4. Confidence: High
- Multiple corroborating sources
- Recent data (2024)
- Official documentation verified