| name | cognitive-design |
| description | Use when designing visual interfaces, data visualizations, educational content, or presentations and need to ensure they align with how humans naturally perceive, process, and remember information. Invoke when user mentions cognitive load, visual hierarchy, dashboard design, form design, e-learning, infographics, or wants to improve clarity and reduce user confusion. Also applies when evaluating existing designs for cognitive alignment or choosing between design alternatives. |
Cognitive Design Principles
Table of Contents
Read This First
What This Skill Does
This skill helps you create cognitively aligned designs - visual interfaces, data visualizations, educational content, and presentations that work with (not against) human perception, attention, memory, and decision-making.
Core principle: Effective design aligns with how people think, not just how things look.
Why Cognitive Design Matters
Common problems this addresses:
- Users miss critical information in dashboards
- Complex interfaces cause cognitive overload and abandonment
- Data visualizations are misinterpreted or misleading
- Educational materials aren't retained
- Form completion rates are low
- Error messages are confusing
How this helps:
- Ground design decisions in cognitive psychology research
- Apply systematic frameworks (Cognitive Design Pyramid, Design Feedback Loop, Three-Layer Model)
- Evaluate designs against objective cognitive criteria
- Choose appropriate visual encodings based on perceptual hierarchy
- Manage attention, memory limits, and cognitive load
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- ✓ Designing new interfaces, dashboards, visualizations, or educational content
- ✓ Users report confusion, overwhelm, or missing information
- ✓ Improving designs with poor metrics (low completion rates, high bounce rates)
- ✓ Conducting design reviews and need systematic evaluation
- ✓ Choosing between design alternatives with cognitive rationale
- ✓ Advocating for design decisions to stakeholders
- ✓ Designing high-stakes interfaces where cognitive failure has consequences
Do NOT use for:
- ✗ Pure aesthetic/brand identity decisions unrelated to cognition
- ✗ Technical implementation (coding, databases)
- ✗ Business strategy (feature prioritization, pricing)
- ✗ Tool-specific training (how to use Figma, Tableau, etc.)
How This Skill Works
This is an interactive hub - you choose your path based on current need:
- Learning mode: Start with Path 1 (Cognitive Foundations) to understand principles
- Application mode: Jump to Path 2 (Frameworks) or Path 4 (Domain Guidance) to apply to specific design
- Evaluation mode: Use Path 3 (Evaluation Tools) to assess existing designs
- Quick mode: Use Path 6 (Quick Reference) for rapid decision-making
After completing any path, return to the menu to select another or exit.
Collaborative Nature
I'll guide you through cognitive design principles by:
- Explaining WHY certain designs work (cognitive foundations)
- Providing HOW to apply principles (frameworks and workflows)
- Offering domain-specific guidance (data viz, UX, education, storytelling)
- Evaluating designs systematically (checklists and audits)
You bring domain expertise and context; I provide cognitive science grounding.
How to Use This Skill
Prerequisites
- Basic design literacy (familiarity with UI terminology, common chart types)
- Understanding of user tasks and context (from user research, stories, or brief)
- Access to design being created or evaluated
Expected Outcomes
Immediate:
- Designs with clear visual hierarchy
- Reduced cognitive load (fewer overwhelm complaints)
- Systematic evaluation process
Short-term (weeks):
- Improved usability metrics (completion rates, time-on-task)
- Fewer user support requests
- More defensible design decisions
Long-term (months):
- Internalized cognitive principles
- Team shared vocabulary
- Measurable business impact
Workflows
Choose a workflow based on your current situation:
New Design Workflow
Use when: Creating a new interface, dashboard, visualization, or educational content from scratch
Time: 2-4 hours
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
New Design Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Orient to cognitive principles
- [ ] Step 2: Structure design thinking with frameworks
- [ ] Step 3: Apply domain-specific guidance
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate design for cognitive alignment
- [ ] Step 5: Check for common mistakes
- [ ] Step 6: Iterate based on findings
Step 1: Orient to cognitive principles
Start with Cognitive Foundations for deep understanding of WHY designs work (perception, memory, Gestalt principles) OR use Quick Reference for rapid orientation (20 core principles, decision rules). Foundations give you theoretical grounding; Quick Reference gets you started faster.
Step 2: Structure design thinking with frameworks
Use Design Frameworks to apply systematic approaches: Cognitive Design Pyramid (4-tier quality assessment), Design Feedback Loop (interaction cycles), and Three-Layer Visualization Model (data communication fidelity). These provide repeatable structure for design decisions.
Step 3: Apply domain-specific guidance
Choose your domain: Data Visualization for charts/dashboards, UX Product Design for interfaces/apps, Educational Design for e-learning/training, or Storytelling & Journalism for data journalism/presentations. Apply tailored cognitive principles for your specific context.
Step 4: Evaluate design for cognitive alignment
Use Evaluation Tools to assess systematically: Cognitive Design Checklist (8 dimensions including visibility, hierarchy, chunking) and Visualization Audit Framework (4 criteria: Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics). Identify weaknesses and prioritize fixes.
Step 5: Check for common mistakes
Review Cognitive Fallacies to prevent failures: chartjunk, truncated axes, 3D distortion, cognitive biases, data integrity violations. Ensure your design avoids misleading patterns.
Step 6: Iterate based on findings
Return to domain guidance or frameworks as needed. Fix issues identified in evaluation. Re-evaluate until design passes cognitive alignment criteria (avg score ≥3.5 on rubric).
Design Review Workflow
Use when: Evaluating existing designs for cognitive alignment, conducting design critiques, or diagnosing usability issues
Time: 30-60 minutes
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Design Review Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Systematic assessment with evaluation tools
- [ ] Step 2: Quick checks for common mistakes
- [ ] Step 3: Rapid validation against core principles
- [ ] Step 4: Note issues and prioritize fixes
Step 1: Systematic assessment with evaluation tools
Start with Evaluation Tools for comprehensive review: Apply Cognitive Design Checklist (visibility, hierarchy, chunking, simplicity, memory support, feedback, consistency, scanning) and Visualization Audit Framework (score Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics 1-5). Identify failing dimensions.
Step 2: Quick checks for common mistakes
Reference Cognitive Fallacies for rapid diagnosis: Look for chartjunk, truncated axes, 3D effects, misleading colors, data integrity violations. These are common culprits in cognitive failures.
Step 3: Rapid validation against core principles
Use Quick Reference for fast validation: Apply 3-question check (Attention? Memory? Clarity?), verify chart selection matches task, check color usage, confirm chunking fits working memory. Catches major issues quickly.
Step 4: Note issues and prioritize fixes
Document findings with severity: CRITICAL (integrity violations, accessibility failures), HIGH (clarity/efficiency issues preventing use), MEDIUM (suboptimal patterns, aesthetic issues), LOW (minor optimizations). Prioritize fixes foundation-first (perception → coherence → engagement → behavior).
Quick Validation Workflow
Use when: Need rapid go/no-go decision, spot-checking changes, or validating against cognitive basics during active design work
Time: 5-10 minutes
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Quick Validation Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Three-question rapid check
- [ ] Step 2: Spot checks if issues found
Step 1: Three-question rapid check
Use Quick Reference and apply: (1) Attention - "Is it obvious what to look at first?" (visual hierarchy clear, primary elements salient, predictable scanning), (2) Memory - "Is user required to remember anything that could be shown?" (state visible, options presented, fits 4±1 chunks), (3) Clarity - "Can someone unfamiliar understand in 5 seconds?" (purpose graspable, no unnecessary decoration, familiar terminology). If all YES → likely cognitively sound.
Step 2: Spot checks if issues found
If any question fails, use Evaluation Tools for targeted diagnosis: Failed attention? Check hierarchy and visual salience sections. Failed memory? Check chunking and memory support sections. Failed clarity? Check simplicity and labeling sections. Apply specific fixes from relevant section.
Path Selection Menu
Choose your path based on current need:
Path 1: Understand Cognitive Foundations
Choose this when: You want to learn the core cognitive psychology principles underlying effective design (attention, memory, perception, Gestalt grouping, visual encoding hierarchy).
What you'll get: Deep understanding of WHY certain designs work, grounded in research from Tufte, Norman, Ware, Cleveland & McGill, Mayer, and others.
Time: 20-40 minutes
→ Go to Cognitive Foundations resource
Path 2: Apply Design Frameworks
Choose this when: You want systematic frameworks to structure your design thinking and decision-making.
What you'll get: Three complementary frameworks:
- Cognitive Design Pyramid (4 tiers: Perceptual Efficiency → Cognitive Coherence → Emotional Engagement → Behavioral Alignment)
- Design Feedback Loop (Perceive → Interpret → Decide → Act → Learn)
- Three-Layer Visualization Model (Data → Visual Encoding → Cognitive Interpretation)
Time: 30-45 minutes
Path 3: Evaluate Existing Designs
Choose this when: You need to assess a design systematically for cognitive alignment, or conducting a design review/critique.
What you'll get:
- Cognitive Design Checklist (visibility, hierarchy, chunking, consistency, feedback, memory support)
- Visualization Audit Framework (4 criteria: Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics)
- Examples of evaluation in practice
Time: 30-60 minutes (depending on design complexity)
→ Go to Evaluation Tools resource
Path 4: Get Domain-Specific Guidance
Choose this when: You're working on a specific type of design and want tailored cognitive principles for that context.
Choose your domain:
4a. Data Visualization (Charts, Dashboards, Analytics)
→ Go to Data Visualization resource
Covers: Chart selection via task-encoding alignment, dashboard hierarchy and grouping, progressive disclosure for exploration, narrative data visualization
4b. Product/UX Design (Interfaces, Mobile Apps, Web Applications)
→ Go to UX Product Design resource
Covers: Learnability via familiar patterns, task flow efficiency, cognitive load management, onboarding design, error handling
4c. Educational Design (E-Learning, Training, Instructional Materials)
→ Go to Educational Design resource
Covers: Multimedia learning principles, dual coding, worked examples, retrieval practice, segmenting, coherence principle
4d. Storytelling/Journalism (Data Journalism, Presentations, Infographics)
→ Go to Storytelling & Journalism resource
Covers: Visual narrative structure, annotation strategies, scrollytelling, framing and context, visual metaphors
Path 5: Avoid Common Mistakes
Choose this when: You want to prevent or diagnose cognitive design failures - chartjunk, misleading visualizations, cognitive biases, data integrity violations.
What you'll get:
- Common cognitive fallacies explained (WHY they fail)
- Visual misleads and how to avoid them
- Integrity principles for trustworthy design
Time: 15-25 minutes
→ Go to Cognitive Fallacies resource
Path 6: Access Quick Reference
Choose this when: You need rapid design guidance, core principles summary, or quick validation checks.
What you'll get:
- 20 core actionable principles (one-sentence summaries)
- 3-question quick check (Attention, Memory, Clarity)
- Common decision rules (when to use bar vs pie charts, how to chunk information, etc.)
- Design heuristics at a glance
Time: 5-15 minutes
→ Go to Quick Reference resource
Path 7: Exit
Choose this when: You've completed your design work or gathered the information you need.
Before you exit:
- Have you achieved your goal for this session?
- Do you need to return to any path for deeper exploration?
- Have you documented key design decisions and cognitive rationale?
Thank you for using the Cognitive Design skill. Your designs are now more cognitively aligned!