| name | create-issue |
| description | Create an issue in GitHub or Jira. Automatically detects if GitHub issues are enabled; if so creates a GitHub issue, otherwise creates a Jira issue. |
| allowed-tools | Bash(gh:*), Bash(jira:*), Bash(git:*), Read, Write |
Create Issue
Create an issue in the appropriate tracker (GitHub Issues or Jira).
Step 1: Detect Issue Tracker
Get repository name:
basename $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)Check if GitHub issues are enabled:
gh repo view --json hasIssuesEnabled --jq '.hasIssuesEnabled'- If
true→ Create GitHub issue - If
false→ Create Jira issue
- If
Determine issue type: Task, Bug, or Story
Check for assignee in user's request
Determine priority/labels based on severity
GitHub Issues
If GitHub issues are enabled, use gh issue create.
Step 2a: Write issue body to issue-body.md
Use the appropriate template based on issue type (see Templates section below).
Note: This file will be deleted after the command runs.
Step 2b: Run gh command
gh issue create \
--title "<SUMMARY>" \
--body-file issue-body.md \
--label "<LABEL>" && rm issue-body.md
Add --assignee "<username>" if user specified an assignee.
Note: No repo name prefix needed - GitHub issues are already scoped to the repository.
Jira Issues
If GitHub issues are disabled, use jira issue create.
Step 2a: Write issue body to issue-body.md
Use the appropriate template based on issue type (see Templates section below).
Note: This file will be deleted after the command runs.
Step 2b: Run jira command
jira issue create --no-input \
--type "<TYPE>" \
--priority "<PRIORITY>" \
--label "<LABEL>" \
--summary "[<REPO-NAME>] <SUMMARY>" \
--template issue-body.md && rm issue-body.md
Add --assignee "<username>" if user specified an assignee.
Templates
Choose the appropriate template based on issue type:
Template: Task
## What
Provide a clear and concise description of the task.
## In Scope
- Define what is included in this task
## Out of Scope
- Clarify what is not covered
## Security and Compliance
- If no security/compliance impact, write: "No direct security or compliance impact."
- If there IS impact, be specific about which control/requirement is violated and the actual risk
## Testing Details
- Outline the testing strategy
## Technical Details
Include any remaining details such as code snippets, file locations, or tool suggestions.
Template: Bug
## Description
A concise description of the bug.
## Environment
- **Environment:** (e.g., Test, Production)
- **App Version:**
- **Browser/OS:**
- **Affected Component:**
## Actual Behaviour
Detailed description of what actually happened. Include any error messages, logs, or screenshots.
## Expected Behaviour
Detailed explanation of what should have happened.
## Steps to Reproduce
1. Step one
2. Step two
3. Step three
**Reproducibility:** (Always, Sometimes, Rarely)
## Impact & Severity
- **Impact:** Describe the impact on users or business operations
- **Severity:** (Critical, Major, Minor)
## Troubleshooting & Workaround
- Steps already taken to diagnose or fix the issue
- Temporary workaround available (if any)
## Additional Information
- Screenshots, videos, or additional logs
- Related bugs or tickets
- Potential fixes or areas to investigate (optional)
Template: Story
## Who
- **User Group:** Who will use or benefit from this feature (end-users, admins, editors, etc.)
- **Stakeholders:** Relevant internal teams or customer segments
## What
- **Intent:** Describe the goal of the story; focus on what needs to be achieved, not on technical implementation
- **Scope:** Outline the high-level functionality without UI specifics or library details
## Why
- **Business Value:** Explain how this feature improves UX, increases retention, or shortens the journey to issue resolution
- **Metrics/KPIs:** Connect the story to relevant performance indicators
- **Non-Functional Requirements:** Include performance, security, compliance, and any other quality requirements
## High-Level Description & Design
- **Overview:** Provide a brief narrative of the feature
- **Figma/Design Link:** [Insert link] with all relevant design notes
- **Design Requirements:** UI/UX must cater to all screen sizes, including very small devices. Include designs for buttons with text on two rows to support multiple languages
## Backend API & Contract Changes
- **API Changes:** Describe any required changes or new endpoints
- **Integration:** Specify the method for frontend integration
- **Performance & Security:** Highlight any potential performance issues or security considerations
## Frontend Considerations
- **Platform-Specific Notes:** List any particular requirements for different platforms
- **Error & Success Paths:** Clearly define both success and error flows
## Infrastructure & Compliance
- **Impact Assessment:** Evaluate any effects on infrastructure or security compliance standards
- **Performance & Cost:** Highlight any potential performance or cost implications
## Dashboard & Asset Management
- **Dashboard Impact:** Assess any configuration changes or new dashboard requirements
- **Asset Requirements:** Ensure all assets (images, text, translations) are available
## Dependencies & Risks
- **Dependencies:** List any related stories, external dependencies, or systems
- **Blockers:** Identify potential blockers that might impact progress
- **Risks:** Outline possible risks affecting feature delivery
- **Mitigation Strategies:** Describe actions to minimize or manage these risks
## Technical Documentation
- **Documentation Links:** Include links to relevant technical documentation or architecture diagrams
- **Additional Context:** Provide any extra technical notes that could aid implementation
## Environment & Release Notes
- **Environment Considerations:** Note any environment-specific details
- **Release Planning:** Detail feature flags, rollback plans, or special deployment instructions
## Testing Strategy
- **Testing Requirements:** Define testing requirements beyond acceptance criteria
- **Test Scenarios:** Outline key test cases and scenarios
## Acceptance Criteria
- Draft detailed acceptance criteria covering all success scenarios and all error paths
- Variations due to dynamic factors
- Ensure the criteria are measurable and leave no room for ambiguity
## Post-Release Monitoring
- **Monitoring Metrics:** Specify metrics or logs to monitor after release
- **Feedback Mechanism:** Outline how to gather user feedback and performance data post-deployment
Priority Mapping (Jira only)
| Severity | Jira Priority |
|---|---|
| Critical | Blocker |
| High | Critical |
| Medium | Major |
| Low | Minor |
| Info | Minor |
Important Rules
- GitHub Issues:
- Use
gh issue createwith--body-file - No repo name prefix needed (issues are scoped to repo)
- Labels are simple strings (e.g.,
bug,enhancement,documentation)
- Use
- Jira Issues:
- Always prefix summary with repo name:
[repo-name] Brief description - Always use
--no-inputflag to prevent interactive prompts - Do NOT specify a project (
-por--project) - use default from user's config - Set 15 second timeout - if it hangs, the command is malformed
- Always prefix summary with repo name:
- Both:
- Use Markdown format
- Use
##for main headings,-for bullet points - Use backticks for inline code
- For sections not applicable, write "N/A" or "Nothing to mention"
- Delete the temp file (
issue-body.md) after creating the issue