Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

detecting-buffer-overflows

@majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
3
0

Detects stack and heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities in binary code by identifying unsafe memory operations. Use when analyzing buffer handling, string manipulation functions, or investigating memory corruption vulnerabilities.

Install Skill

Shared

Installs to .agents/skills, used by Codex, Amp, Warp, Cursor, OpenCode, and more.

CodexAmp
Warp
CursorOpenCode
Cline
Gemini CLI
GitHub Copilot
Personal

Available across projects.

$npx skills-installer add @majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/detecting-buffer-overflows --client shared
Project

Writes to .agents/skills.

$npx skills-installer add @majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/detecting-buffer-overflows -p --client shared
Note: Review the skill instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name detecting-buffer-overflows
description Detects stack and heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities in binary code by identifying unsafe memory operations. Use when analyzing buffer handling, string manipulation functions, or investigating memory corruption vulnerabilities.

Buffer Overflow Detection

Detection Workflow

  1. Identify dangerous function calls: strcpy, strcat, sprintf, gets, memcpy without size checks
  2. Trace data flow: Use xrefs_to from input sources (network, files, user input) to sinks
  3. Verify bounds checking: For each copy operation, check if source size is validated and destination buffer is sufficient
  4. Assess exploitability: Can attacker control overflow size? Is there controlled write to critical memory?

Key Patterns

  • Stack overflow: Unbounded copy to local buffer
  • Heap overflow: Malloc followed by unchecked write
  • Off-by-one: Loop condition or bounds check error
  • Integer overflow leading to buffer overflow

Output Format

Report with: id, type (stack/heap/static), severity, confidence, location, sink, source, buffer size, overflow potential, evidence, exploitability, mitigation.

Severity Guidelines

  • CRITICAL: Unbounded copy to stack buffer, attacker-controlled size
  • HIGH: Bounded copy with insufficient checks, off-by-one errors
  • MEDIUM: Potential overflow with limited attacker control
  • LOW: Unlikely to be exploitable, theoretical only

See Also

  • patterns.md - Detailed detection patterns and exploitation scenarios
  • examples.md - Example analysis cases and code samples
  • references.md - CWE references and mitigation strategies