| name | literature-gap |
| description | Identify research gaps from systematic literature reviews. Use when: (1) Completing literature reviews, (2) Justifying new studies, (3) Grant proposal development, (4) Dissertation planning, (5) Identifying future research directions. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Grep |
| version | 1.0.0 |
Literature Gap Identification Skill
Purpose
Systematically identify and prioritize research gaps from literature synthesis.
Types of Research Gaps
1. Knowledge Gaps
- Phenomenon not yet studied
- Understudied populations
- Unexplored contexts
2. Methodological Gaps
- Lack of rigorous designs (RCTs)
- Limited longitudinal studies
- Need for mixed methods
3. Theoretical Gaps
- Competing theories not tested
- Mechanisms not understood
- Mediators/moderators unexplored
4. Practice Gaps
- Interventions not tested
- Implementation not studied
- Scalability unknown
5. Evidence Quality Gaps
- High risk of bias in existing studies
- Small sample sizes
- Inconsistent results needing resolution
Gap Analysis Process
- Synthesize Findings: What do we know?
- Identify Limitations: What are the weaknesses?
- Find Patterns: What's consistently missing?
- Prioritize: Which gaps are most important?
- Justify: Why does this gap matter?
Example
Research Area: Mindfulness interventions for anxiety
Gaps Identified:
- Few studies in adolescent populations (knowledge gap)
- Lack of active control comparisons (methodological gap)
- Mechanisms of action unclear (theoretical gap)
- No implementation studies in schools (practice gap)
- High attrition rates not addressed (evidence quality gap)
Prioritized Gap: Adolescent populations with active controls
- Feasible, high impact, fills critical knowledge void
Version: 1.0.0