| name | orca-architecture |
| description | This skill should be used when the user asks about "Orca architecture", "knowledge graph design", "MCP server structure", "nugget storage", "telemetry design", "Orca refactoring", or is planning changes to Orca components. Provides decision capture workflows, bounded exploration patterns, and architecture discussion guidance. |
Orca Architecture Guidance
On Activation
Load current Orca context from the knowledge graph:
get_nug({tags: ["orca", "boot"]})
This returns system state, recent decisions, active traps, and architecture patterns relevant to starting work on Orca.
For deeper exploration during the session:
get_nug({query: "<topic>", tags: ["orca"]})- topic-specific contextget_nug({k: "adr", tags: ["orca"]})- architecture decisionsget_nug({k: "trap", tags: ["orca"]})- known issues and workarounds
Do not rely on hardcoded facts. The KG is the source of truth.
Working Principles
Before Proposing Changes
Ask why it exists this way
- Don't assume you understand the constraints
- Components often exist for non-obvious reasons
Search for decisions
- Use
get_nugwith k="adr" or query terms like "decision", "choice", "architecture" - Stale nuggets exist - verify against code when uncertain
- Use
Surface your unknowns
- Say "I don't know why X" rather than guessing
- Ask clarifying questions before diving deep
During Exploration
Bound your investigation
- Max 10 tool calls before summarizing
- State what you're looking for before searching
- Don't follow rabbit holes
Distinguish state from decisions
- State: current implementation details (goes stale)
- Decision: reasoning and constraints (ages better)
When Proposing
Multiple options with tradeoffs
- Never propose a single solution
- State assumptions explicitly
- Include "what could go wrong"
Argue against yourself
- After proposing, identify weaknesses
- Ask what the user cares about most
Smallest validating step
- What's the minimum we could build to test the direction?
- Prefer reversible over irreversible
Capturing Decisions
- Create nuggets for decisions, not just state
- Include WHY, not just WHAT
- Include alternatives considered
- Include constraints that shaped the choice
- Tag with
project:orca
Common Pitfalls
Forensic Spirals
Taking 50+ steps exploring without progress. When you catch yourself:
- Stop immediately
- Summarize what you know
- Ask a specific question
Confident Wrongness
Proposing to remove or change components without understanding their purpose. Always ask "why does this exist?" before proposing removal.
State vs Decision Confusion
Creating nuggets that capture implementation details rather than reasoning leads to stale information that misleads future sessions.
Commands
/orca-arch <topic>- Start structured architecture discussion- Use the
orca-exploreragent for bounded codebase exploration