Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Guidelines for creating and managing implementation plans with citations

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name plan-protocol
description Guidelines for creating and managing implementation plans with citations

Plan Protocol

Load this skill when creating or updating implementation plans.

TL;DR Checklist

When creating or updating a plan, ensure:

  • YAML frontmatter with status, phase, updated
  • ## Goal section (one sentence)
  • ## Context & Decisions table with citations (ref:delegation-id)
  • Phases with status markers: [COMPLETE], [IN PROGRESS], [PENDING]
  • Tasks with hierarchical numbering (1.1, 1.2, 2.1)
  • Only ONE task marked ← CURRENT
  • Citations for all research-based decisions

When to Use

  1. Starting a multi-step implementation
  2. After receiving a complex user request
  3. When tracking progress across phases
  4. After research that informs architectural decisions

When NOT to Use

  1. Simple one-off tasks → use built-in todos instead
  2. Pure research/exploration → use delegations only
  3. Quick fixes that don't need tracking
  4. Single-file changes with no dependencies

Plan Format

Use plan_save with this exact markdown format:

---
status: STATUS
phase: PHASE_NUMBER
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
---

# Implementation Plan

## Goal
ONE_SENTENCE_DESCRIBING_OUTCOME

## Context & Decisions
| Decision | Rationale | Source |
|----------|-----------|--------|
| CHOICE | WHY | `ref:DELEGATION_ID` |

## Phase 1: NAME [STATUS_MARKER]
- [x] 1.1 Completed task
- [x] 1.2 Another completed task → `ref:DELEGATION_ID`

## Phase 2: NAME [IN PROGRESS]
- [x] 2.1 Completed task
- [ ] **2.2 Current task** ← CURRENT
- [ ] 2.3 Pending task

## Phase 3: NAME [PENDING]
- [ ] 3.1 Future task
- [ ] 3.2 Another future task

## Notes
- YYYY-MM-DD: Observation or decision `ref:DELEGATION_ID`

Frontmatter Fields

Field Values Description
status not-started, in-progress, complete, blocked Overall plan status
phase Number (1, 2, 3...) Current phase number
updated YYYY-MM-DD Last update date

Phase Status Markers

Marker Meaning
[PENDING] Not yet started
[IN PROGRESS] Currently being worked on
[COMPLETE] Finished successfully
[BLOCKED] Waiting on dependencies

State Machine

Plan Lifecycle

not-started → in-progress → complete
                         ↘ blocked

Phase Lifecycle

[PENDING] → [IN PROGRESS] → [COMPLETE]
                         ↘ [BLOCKED]

Task Lifecycle

[ ] unchecked → [x] checked

Critical Rules

  1. Only ONE phase may be [IN PROGRESS] at any time
  2. Only ONE task may have ← CURRENT marker at any time
  3. Move ← CURRENT immediately when starting a new task
  4. Mark tasks [x] immediately after completing them

Citations & Delegations

Where Citations Come From

Citations reference delegation research. The flow is:

  1. You delegate research: delegate to researcher or explore
  2. Delegation completes with a readable ID (e.g., swift-amber-falcon)
  3. You cite that research in the plan: ref:swift-amber-falcon

When to Cite

Situation Action
Architectural decision based on research Add to Context & Decisions table
Task informed by research Append → ref:id to task line
Implementation detail from research Inline citation in Notes

How to Find Delegation IDs

  • Use delegation_list() to see all delegations
  • Use delegation_read("id") to verify content before citing

❌ NEVER

  • Make up delegation IDs
  • Cite without actually reading the delegation
  • Skip citations for research-based decisions

Examples

✅ CORRECT: Well-formed plan

---
status: in-progress
phase: 2
updated: 2026-01-02
---

# Implementation Plan

## Goal
Add JWT authentication with refresh token support

## Context & Decisions
| Decision | Rationale | Source |
|----------|-----------|--------|
| Use bcrypt (12 rounds) | Industry standard, balance of security/speed | `ref:swift-amber-falcon` |
| JWT with refresh tokens | Stateless auth, mobile-friendly | `ref:calm-jade-owl` |

## Phase 1: Research [COMPLETE]
- [x] 1.1 Research auth patterns → `ref:swift-amber-falcon`
- [x] 1.2 Evaluate token strategies → `ref:calm-jade-owl`

## Phase 2: Implementation [IN PROGRESS]
- [x] 2.1 Set up project structure
- [ ] **2.2 Add password hashing** ← CURRENT
- [ ] 2.3 Implement JWT generation

## Phase 3: Testing [PENDING]
- [ ] 3.1 Write unit tests
- [ ] 3.2 Integration tests

## Notes
- 2026-01-02: Chose bcrypt over argon2 for broader library support `ref:swift-amber-falcon`

❌ WRONG: Missing frontmatter

# Implementation Plan

## Goal
Add authentication

Error: Plan must have YAML frontmatter with status, phase, updated.

❌ WRONG: Multiple CURRENT markers

## Phase 2: Implementation [IN PROGRESS]
- [ ] **2.1 Task one** ← CURRENT
- [ ] **2.2 Task two** ← CURRENT

Error: Only one task may be marked CURRENT.

❌ WRONG: Decision without citation

## Context & Decisions
| Decision | Rationale | Source |
|----------|-----------|--------|
| Use Redis | It's fast | - |

Error: Decisions must cite research with ref:delegation-id.

❌ WRONG: Invalid phase status

## Phase 1: Research [DONE]

Error: Use [COMPLETE], not [DONE]. Valid markers: [PENDING], [IN PROGRESS], [COMPLETE], [BLOCKED].


Troubleshooting

Error Message Fix
"Missing frontmatter" Add ---\nstatus: in-progress\nphase: 1\nupdated: 2026-01-02\n--- at top
"Multiple CURRENT markers" Remove ← CURRENT from all but the active task
"Invalid citation format" Use ref:delegation-id format (e.g., ref:swift-amber-falcon)
"Missing goal" Add ## Goal section with one-sentence description
"Empty phase" Add at least one task to each phase
"Invalid phase status" Use [PENDING], [IN PROGRESS], [COMPLETE], or [BLOCKED]

Before Saving Checklist

Before calling plan_save, verify:

  • Frontmatter: Has status, phase, and updated date?
  • Goal: Is there a clear, one-sentence goal?
  • Citations: Are all research-based decisions cited with ref:id?
  • Single CURRENT: Is exactly one task marked ← CURRENT?
  • Valid markers: Do all phases use valid status markers?
  • Hierarchical IDs: Are tasks numbered correctly (1.1, 1.2, 2.1)?