| name | memory-curator |
| description | Manage architectural decisions and insights in memory.jsonl. Use when you need to document strategic decisions, lessons learned, fixed problems, or architectural insights. Append-only audit trail for project knowledge. |
memory.jsonl is an append-only audit trail of durable engineering knowledge:
- Never edit or delete existing lines.
- Never write to the file manually—always use the script.
- Add a new entry to correct or supersede an older one.
When to Use (Triage Test — all three are quick yes/no)
Create a memory entry only if at least one is true:
- Will this decision meaningfully affect how we build other features?
- Is this a pattern we’ll want to repeat across the codebase?
- Does this prevent a category of future mistakes?
If no to all three → do not create an entry. Put implementation detail into the task context instead.
Workflow (Authoritative)
Always use the helper script and never edit the file by hand.
python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/.claude/skills/memory-curator/scripts/add_memory_entry.py \
--summary "<see Summary Format below>" \
--tags architecture,api,lessons-learned \
--links "TASK-090 services/backend-api/src/plaid/plaid-service.ts"
The script will:
- Compute the next sequential ID (
mem-0001,mem-0002, …) - Add a UTC timestamp (
YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ) - Append a single JSON object as one line to
.meridian/memory.jsonl - Echo the written entry for confirmation
Summary Format (consistent & skimmable)
Write --summary as concise Markdown using these bolded labels in this order (one paragraph per label, short bullets allowed). This gives structure without changing the JSON schema.
**Decision:** <The decision or principle in a single sentence.>
**Problem:** <What made this necessary; symptoms, constraints, or failure mode.>
**Alternatives:** <Narrow list of serious options considered and why rejected.>
**Trade-offs:** <What we accept (complexity, perf, coupling) and why it’s OK.>
**Impact/Scope:** <Which services/modules/patterns this affects now and later.>
**Pattern:** <If reusable, name it; 1–2 rules of thumb to apply next time.>
Keep to ~6–10 lines total. If it doesn’t fit, it’s probably a design doc, not a memory entry—link to that doc and keep the summary short.
Tags (small, useful taxonomy)
Use kebab‑case tags. Prefer a few broad tags over many hyper‑specific ones.
- Core:
architecture,data-model,api,contracts,security,performance,reliability,observability,testing,tooling,build,release,i18n,a11y,cost - Nature:
decision,pattern,lesson,tradeoff,deprecation,migration - Stack (when relevant):
nextjs,react,node,prisma,postgres,redis,s3,graphql,openapi
Examples:
--tags architecture,pattern,nextjs
--tags api,contracts,lesson
Links (make future retrieval easy)
Use --links for TASK IDs, critical file paths, PR URLs, or design docs. Examples:
--links "TASK-091 services/web/app/(auth)/route.ts https://github.com/org/repo/pull/1234"
- Prefer relative repo paths over vague descriptions.
- It’s fine to include multiple
--linksflags or a space/comma‑separated list. - Do not put secrets or tokens in links.
JSON Shape (what the script writes)
Typical entry:
{"id":"mem-0038","timestamp":"2025-11-12T05:55:31Z",
"summary":"**Decision:** ...","tags":["architecture","pattern","nextjs"],
"links":["TASK-090","services/backend-api/src/plaid/plaid-service.ts"]}
Your script may include additional fields; never rely on field order.
Corrections, Supersession, and Deprecation
Never edit old lines. Add a new entry that references the old one by ID in
--summaryor--links.Use tags like
deprecationorlessonto signal context.Recommended summary line when superseding:
**Decision:** Supersedes mem-0021 — <new decision>. Why: <reason>.
Good vs Bad Examples
Bad (too tactical): “Add a scroll indicator with 15 segments using requestAnimationFrame.” Why it’s bad: UI detail, not a reusable principle.
Good (durable pattern):
**Decision:** Collocate request orchestration in Next.js Route Handlers; keep helpers file‑local.
**Problem:** 3‑layer service indirection slowed iteration and hid data contracts.
**Alternatives:** Keep services layer (rejected: redundancy, test friction); global helpers (rejected: coupling).
**Trade-offs:** Slight duplication accepted to gain locality; extraction only after 3+ call sites.
**Impact/Scope:** All new routes in /app/*; refactors opportunistically in legacy pages.
**Pattern:** Orchestrator <120 LOC; helpers <30 LOC; schema at boundary.
Common Queries (jq snippets)
# All architecture decisions
jq -s '.[] | select(.tags != null and (.tags | index("architecture"))) ' .meridian/memory.jsonl
# Entries mentioning a task
jq -s '.[] | select(.links != null and (.links | index("TASK-090")))' .meridian/memory.jsonl
# Most recent 5 entries
tail -5 .meridian/memory.jsonl | jq -s '.'
# Security-related
jq -s '.[] | select(.tags != null and (.tags | index("security")))' .meridian/memory.jsonl
Guardrails
- No secrets/PII—ever.
- Keep entries short and pattern/decision oriented.
- Prefer one strong entry over several fragmented ones.
- If you’re unsure whether it belongs, add the insight to
TASK-###-context.mdand revisit later.