Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Open source license compliance including compatibility analysis, obligations tracking, and compliance workflows

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name license-compliance
description Open source license compliance including compatibility analysis, obligations tracking, and compliance workflows
allowed-tools Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Task

Open Source License Compliance

Comprehensive guidance for open source license compliance before and during development.

When to Use This Skill

  • Evaluating open source dependencies for new projects
  • Checking license compatibility between packages
  • Understanding obligations for distribution
  • Creating attribution notices and NOTICES files
  • Establishing license policies for your organization

License Categories

Permissive Licenses

Allow use, modification, and distribution with minimal restrictions.

License Obligations Commercial Use Patent Grant
MIT Attribution No
BSD-2-Clause Attribution No
BSD-3-Clause Attribution, no endorsement No
Apache-2.0 Attribution, state changes, NOTICE Yes
ISC Attribution No

Copyleft Licenses

Require derivative works to use the same license.

License Copyleft Scope SaaS Trigger Distribution Obligations
GPL-2.0 Strong No Source disclosure
GPL-3.0 Strong No Source disclosure, anti-Tivoization
LGPL-2.1 Weak (library) No Source for library, linking allowed
AGPL-3.0 Strong + Network Yes Source disclosure on network use
MPL-2.0 File-level No Source for modified files
EPL-2.0 Module-level No Source for modified modules

Weak Copyleft vs Strong Copyleft

Strong Copyleft (GPL):
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Your Application (becomes GPL)          │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │  GPL Library (linked/included)   │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────┘   │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘

Weak Copyleft (LGPL):
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Your Application (any license)          │
│  ↓ dynamic link                          │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │  LGPL Library (LGPL remains)     │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────┘   │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘

License Compatibility

Compatibility Matrix

Inbound License → Outbound License Compatibility

FROM ↓ / TO →  | MIT | Apache | BSD | LGPL | MPL | GPL | AGPL
---------------|-----|--------|-----|------|-----|-----|------
MIT            |  ✓  |   ✓    |  ✓  |  ✓   |  ✓  |  ✓  |  ✓
Apache-2.0     |  ✗  |   ✓    |  ✗  |  ✓   |  ✓  |  ✓* |  ✓*
BSD-3-Clause   |  ✓  |   ✓    |  ✓  |  ✓   |  ✓  |  ✓  |  ✓
LGPL-2.1       |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✓   |  ✗  |  ✓  |  ✓
MPL-2.0        |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✓  |  ✓  |  ✓
GPL-2.0        |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✗  |  ✓  |  ✗
GPL-3.0        |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✗  |  ✓  |  ✓
AGPL-3.0       |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✗  |  ✗  |  ✓

✓ = Compatible, ✗ = Incompatible
* GPL-3.0 only (Apache-2.0 incompatible with GPL-2.0)

Common Compatibility Issues

Issue Example Resolution
GPL + Proprietary Using GPL library in closed source Use LGPL alternative or open source
Apache + GPL-2.0 Combining Apache-2.0 with GPL-2.0 Upgrade to GPL-3.0
AGPL + SaaS Using AGPL in web service Open source your code or use alternative
Conflicting Copyleft GPL + EPL in same binary Separate into distinct programs

Obligation Analysis by Use Case

Internal Use Only

License Type Obligations Tracking Required
Permissive None Minimal
Weak Copyleft None Minimal
Strong Copyleft None (no distribution) Minimal
AGPL Source available if network service Yes

Distribution (Desktop/Mobile)

License Type Obligations
MIT, BSD, ISC Include license/copyright in distribution
Apache-2.0 Include license, NOTICE file, state changes
LGPL Provide library source, allow relinking
GPL Provide complete source code
MPL Provide modified file source

SaaS (No Binary Distribution)

License Type Obligations
Permissive None (no distribution)
GPL, LGPL None (no distribution)
AGPL Must provide source to users

License Compliance Implementation

.NET Dependency Analysis

// License scanning integration
public class LicenseComplianceChecker
{
    private readonly IPackageMetadataProvider _packageProvider;
    private readonly LicensePolicy _policy;

    public async Task<ComplianceReport> AnalyzeProject(
        string projectPath,
        CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var packages = await _packageProvider.GetPackages(projectPath, ct);
        var report = new ComplianceReport();

        foreach (var package in packages)
        {
            var license = await _packageProvider.GetLicense(package, ct);

            var evaluation = _policy.Evaluate(license);

            report.Packages.Add(new PackageLicenseInfo
            {
                PackageId = package.Id,
                Version = package.Version,
                License = license.SpdxIdentifier,
                LicenseUrl = license.Url,
                Category = license.Category,
                Status = evaluation.Status,
                Obligations = evaluation.Obligations,
                Issues = evaluation.Issues
            });
        }

        return report;
    }
}

public class LicensePolicy
{
    private readonly HashSet<string> _approved = new()
    {
        "MIT", "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "ISC"
    };

    private readonly HashSet<string> _requiresReview = new()
    {
        "LGPL-2.1", "LGPL-3.0", "MPL-2.0", "EPL-2.0"
    };

    private readonly HashSet<string> _prohibited = new()
    {
        "GPL-2.0", "GPL-3.0", "AGPL-3.0"
    };

    public PolicyEvaluation Evaluate(LicenseInfo license)
    {
        if (_approved.Contains(license.SpdxIdentifier))
        {
            return new PolicyEvaluation
            {
                Status = PolicyStatus.Approved,
                Obligations = GetObligations(license.SpdxIdentifier)
            };
        }

        if (_requiresReview.Contains(license.SpdxIdentifier))
        {
            return new PolicyEvaluation
            {
                Status = PolicyStatus.RequiresReview,
                Obligations = GetObligations(license.SpdxIdentifier),
                Issues = new[] { "Copyleft license requires legal review" }
            };
        }

        if (_prohibited.Contains(license.SpdxIdentifier))
        {
            return new PolicyEvaluation
            {
                Status = PolicyStatus.Prohibited,
                Issues = new[] { "Strong copyleft incompatible with proprietary distribution" }
            };
        }

        return new PolicyEvaluation
        {
            Status = PolicyStatus.Unknown,
            Issues = new[] { $"Unknown license: {license.SpdxIdentifier}" }
        };
    }
}

Attribution and NOTICE Files

// NOTICE file generator
public class NoticeFileGenerator
{
    public string GenerateNotice(IEnumerable<PackageLicenseInfo> packages)
    {
        var sb = new StringBuilder();

        sb.AppendLine("THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE NOTICES AND INFORMATION");
        sb.AppendLine("=============================================");
        sb.AppendLine();
        sb.AppendLine("This software includes the following third-party components:");
        sb.AppendLine();

        foreach (var pkg in packages.OrderBy(p => p.PackageId))
        {
            sb.AppendLine($"## {pkg.PackageId} ({pkg.Version})");
            sb.AppendLine($"License: {pkg.License}");
            sb.AppendLine($"URL: {pkg.LicenseUrl}");
            sb.AppendLine();

            if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(pkg.Copyright))
            {
                sb.AppendLine(pkg.Copyright);
                sb.AppendLine();
            }

            if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(pkg.LicenseText))
            {
                sb.AppendLine("License Text:");
                sb.AppendLine(pkg.LicenseText);
                sb.AppendLine();
            }

            sb.AppendLine("---");
            sb.AppendLine();
        }

        return sb.ToString();
    }
}

.NET Project Configuration

<!-- Enable license metadata in build -->
<PropertyGroup>
  <GeneratePackageOnBuild>true</GeneratePackageOnBuild>
</PropertyGroup>

<ItemGroup>
  <!-- Include NOTICE file in package -->
  <None Include="NOTICE.txt" Pack="true" PackagePath="" />

  <!-- Set license expression for your package -->
  <PackageLicenseExpression>MIT</PackageLicenseExpression>
  <!-- OR for file-based license -->
  <PackageLicenseFile>LICENSE.txt</PackageLicenseFile>
</ItemGroup>

License Policy Template

Organizational License Policy

# Open Source License Policy

## 1. Purpose
This policy governs the use of open source software in [Organization] products.

## 2. License Categories

### 2.1 Approved Licenses (No Review Required)
- MIT
- Apache-2.0
- BSD-2-Clause
- BSD-3-Clause
- ISC
- Unlicense
- CC0-1.0

### 2.2 Requires Review
- LGPL-2.1, LGPL-3.0 (weak copyleft - usage context matters)
- MPL-2.0, EPL-2.0 (file/module-level copyleft)
- Creative Commons (varies by type)
- Dual-licensed packages

### 2.3 Prohibited
- GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0 (strong copyleft - unless project is GPL)
- AGPL-3.0 (network copyleft)
- SSPL (Server Side Public License)
- Any license with field-of-use restrictions
- Unknown or custom licenses without legal review

## 3. Process

### 3.1 New Dependency Addition
1. Check license using `dotnet-license-check` or equivalent
2. If Approved: Proceed, ensure attribution
3. If Requires Review: Submit to legal@company.com
4. If Prohibited: Find alternative or request exception

### 3.2 Distribution
Before any release:
1. Run license audit
2. Generate NOTICE file
3. Include required attribution
4. Archive source code for copyleft compliance

## 4. Exceptions
Exceptions require written approval from Legal and CTO.

## 5. Compliance Verification
- Automated scanning in CI/CD pipeline
- Quarterly manual audits
- Annual policy review

SPDX Identifiers

Common SPDX Identifiers

Permissive:
MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause, ISC, Unlicense, CC0-1.0

Weak Copyleft:
LGPL-2.1-only, LGPL-2.1-or-later, LGPL-3.0-only, LGPL-3.0-or-later
MPL-2.0, EPL-2.0, OSL-3.0

Strong Copyleft:
GPL-2.0-only, GPL-2.0-or-later, GPL-3.0-only, GPL-3.0-or-later
AGPL-3.0-only, AGPL-3.0-or-later

Compound Expressions:
(MIT OR Apache-2.0)  - Choice
(LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT)  - Both apply
GPL-2.0-only WITH Classpath-exception-2.0  - Exception

CI/CD Integration

License Scanning Pipeline

# GitHub Actions example
name: License Compliance Check

on:
  pull_request:
    paths:
      - '**/*.csproj'
      - '**/packages.lock.json'

jobs:
  license-check:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Setup .NET
        uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
        with:
          dotnet-version: '10.0.x'

      - name: Install license checker
        run: dotnet tool install --global dotnet-project-licenses

      - name: Check licenses
        run: |
          dotnet-project-licenses -i . \
            --allowed-license-types "MIT;Apache-2.0;BSD-2-Clause;BSD-3-Clause" \
            --output license-report.json \
            --output-type json

      - name: Upload license report
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: license-report
          path: license-report.json

      - name: Fail on prohibited licenses
        run: |
          if grep -q "GPL-" license-report.json; then
            echo "::error::Prohibited license detected"
            exit 1
          fi

License Compliance Checklist

Pre-Development

  • Define license policy for project
  • Identify project distribution model (SaaS/desktop/library)
  • Determine outbound license for your code
  • Establish dependency review process

During Development

  • Check license before adding each dependency
  • Maintain attribution in NOTICE file
  • Document any exceptions
  • Run license scanning in CI

Pre-Release

  • Complete license audit
  • Generate final NOTICE file
  • Verify all attributions included
  • Archive source for copyleft compliance
  • Legal sign-off if required

Cross-References

  • SBOM: sbom-management for dependency tracking
  • Security: security-frameworks for secure supply chain
  • Data Privacy: Consider data handling in dependencies

Resources