name	markdown-linting
description	Comprehensive markdown linting guidance using markdownlint-cli2. Run, execute, check, and validate markdown files. Fix linting errors (MD0XX rules). Configure .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc (rules and ignores). Set up VS Code extension and GitHub Actions workflows. Use when working with markdown files, encountering validation errors, configuring markdownlint, setting up linting workflows, troubleshooting linting issues, or establishing markdown quality standards.
allowed-tools	Read, Bash, Glob, Grep

Markdown Linting

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for markdown linting using markdownlint-cli2, the industry-standard markdown linter that can be used in any project.

Overview
When to Use This Skill
First Use: Installation and Setup
Quick Start
Unified Tooling Architecture
CRITICAL: Configuration Policy
CRITICAL: NO AUTOMATED SCRIPTS
Running Linting Locally
Intelligent Fix Handling
VS Code Extension Setup (Optional/Advanced)
GitHub Actions Integration (Optional/Advanced)
Customizing Rules (Requires Approval)
Troubleshooting
Best Practices
Resources
Evaluation Scenarios
Multi-Model Testing Notes
Version History
Last Updated

Overview

This tooling enables enforcement of strict markdown quality standards through automated linting. Markdown files can be validated using markdownlint-cli2 with a unified tooling approach that ensures zero configuration drift across VS Code, CLI, and CI/CD environments.

Core Philosophy:

Single source of truth: .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc contains all configuration (rules, ignores, options)
Unified tooling: Same markdownlint-cli2 engine everywhere (VS Code, CLI, CI/CD)
Strict enforcement: Fix content to comply with rules, not rules to accommodate content
Quality-first: Linting rules are intentional and enforce documentation quality

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

User encounters markdown linting errors (MD001, MD013, MD033, etc.)
User asks about markdown validation, formatting, or quality standards
User needs to configure .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc (rules, ignores, or options)
User asks about configuration file setup or structure
User wants to set up VS Code markdown linting extension
User needs to troubleshoot markdown linting issues
User asks how to run markdown linting locally
User wants to understand GitHub Actions markdown validation
User is working with markdown files and needs quality guidance

First Use: Installation and Setup

If this is your first time setting up markdown linting, see the comprehensive installation guide:

Installation and Setup Guide

This guide covers:

Prerequisites (Node.js/npm)
Detection of existing setup
Two approaches: npx (zero setup) vs local install (full features)
Configuration file creation (.markdownlint-cli2.jsonc)
Configuring rules, ignores, and options in one file
Verification steps
Troubleshooting setup issues

Quick detection check:

# Check if you're already set up
ls .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc     # Configuration exists?
npm list markdownlint-cli2      # Package installed?
cat package.json | grep "lint:md"  # Scripts configured?

If any of these are missing, follow the Installation and Setup Guide first.

Quick Start

Option 1: Using npx (zero setup required):

# Check all markdown files
npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"

# Auto-fix issues
npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md" --fix

Option 2: Using npm scripts (if configured):

# Check all markdown files for linting errors
npm run lint:md

# Auto-fix fixable linting issues
npm run lint:md:fix

Option 3: VS Code extension for real-time linting (optional/advanced):

Install davidanson.vscode-markdownlint from VS Code marketplace
Create .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc configuration (see installation guide)
Linting happens as you type with auto-fix on save enabled (if configured)

Unified Tooling Architecture

When configured, markdownlint-cli2 can be used everywhere to ensure zero configuration drift:

Tooling Components

CLI Tool (markdownlint-cli2) - Core component, use this first
- Can be run via npx (zero setup) or local install
- Used for local validation and pre-commit checks
- Foundation for all other integrations
VS Code Extension (davidanson.vscode-markdownlint) - Optional/Advanced
- Uses same markdownlint-cli2 engine as CLI
- Real-time linting as you type
- Auto-fix on save and paste (configurable in .vscode/settings.json)
- See VS Code Extension Setup
GitHub Actions (markdownlint-cli2-action) - Optional/Advanced
- Same engine as VS Code and CLI
- Runs automatically on PRs that modify markdown files (when configured)
- Same rules as local development (no surprises)
- See GitHub Actions Configuration

Configuration Source

All tools read .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc in the project root as the single source of truth:

{
  "gitignore": true,
  "ignores": ["vendor/**/*.md"],
  "config": {
    "default": true,
    "MD013": false
  }
}

What this contains:

gitignore: Automatically excludes files from .gitignore
ignores: Additional glob patterns to exclude from linting
config: Linting rules (all defaults enabled, MD013 disabled for long lines)

Configuration precedence (in decreasing order):

.markdownlint-cli2.{jsonc,yaml,cjs} file - Single source of truth
VS Code user/workspace settings (avoid - not portable)
Default configuration

Note: Changes to .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc apply instantly to all tools (VS Code, CLI, GitHub Actions)

CRITICAL: Configuration Policy

IMPORTANT - Read this before modifying any configuration:

Strict Policy - Never Modify Without Approval

DO NOT modify .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc without explicit approval
Strict linting rules are intentional and enforce documentation quality
If linting errors occur, fix the content to comply with the rules, NOT the rules themselves
Only request rule changes if there is a compelling architectural reason
When in doubt, ask before relaxing any linting rules

Why This Policy Exists

Quality enforcement: Linting rules maintain documentation consistency and professionalism
Best practices: Rules encode markdown best practices accumulated over years
Accessibility: Many rules improve screen reader and markdown parser compatibility
Maintainability: Consistent formatting makes documentation easier to maintain
Collaboration: Shared standards reduce friction in code reviews

Proper Response to Linting Errors

Correct approach:

Error: MD022/blanks-around-headings - Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

Action: Add blank lines before and after the heading in the markdown file

Incorrect approach:

Error: MD022/blanks-around-headings - Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

Action: Disable MD022 rule in .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc

Exception: If you genuinely believe a rule should be modified, present your case to the user with:

The specific rule and why it's problematic
Examples of where it causes issues
Architectural or usability rationale
Proposed configuration change

The user will make the final decision on whether to modify the configuration.

CRITICAL: NO AUTOMATED SCRIPTS

⚠️ SCRIPTS ARE STRICTLY PROHIBITED FOR MARKDOWN LINTING FIXES ⚠️

NEVER use automated scripts to fix markdown files. This includes:

Python/Bash scripts that modify multiple files at once
Regex-based find-and-replace operations across files
Any automated tool that makes bulk changes without human review per-change
"Smart" fixers that detect and add language specifiers to code blocks

Why This Policy Exists

A) Scripts are dangerous - we have seen real issues:

Context blindness: Scripts cannot understand semantic context (e.g., a code block showing tool output vs actual code that needs syntax highlighting)
Over-application: Scripts apply fixes uniformly, even where inappropriate
Cascading damage: One wrong assumption affects hundreds of files, requiring painful manual cleanup
False language detection: Adding text or other language specifiers to blocks that intentionally have none

B) Manual fixes are slower but more accurate and safer:

While manually fixing linting errors one-by-one takes longer, it ensures:

Each change is reviewed in context before application
Semantic meaning is preserved (not just syntactic correctness)
Edge cases are handled appropriately
No collateral damage to unrelated content

The speed/accuracy trade-off is worth it. A script that "saves time" but requires hours of cleanup is a net loss.

Nested Code Blocks: A Critical Complexity

Documentation often contains markdown within markdown - examples showing how to write markdown, skill documentation with code samples, templates, etc. This creates nested structures that scripts cannot handle correctly:

Example: A skill showing how to write a code block:

Here's how to create a Python code block:

````markdown
```python
def hello():
    print("Hello, world!")
```
````

In this example:

The outer fence uses 4 backticks (`````markdown`)
The inner fence uses 3 backticks (```python)
A script seeing ``` might incorrectly add language specifiers or break the nesting

Common nested patterns to watch for:

```{language} - Regular code block with syntax highlighting
````markdown - Wrapper showing markdown examples (uses 4+ backticks)
Code blocks inside code blocks (documentation about documentation)
Example output that should NOT have language specifiers

Scripts cannot reliably distinguish:

Which backtick fence is the "real" one vs an example
Whether a bare ``` is intentional (raw output) or needs a language
The semantic purpose of each code block

Real-World Failure Example

A script added text language specifiers to code blocks showing MCP tool output, Notion searches, and other non-code examples. These blocks were intentionally bare (no language specifier) to show raw output without syntax highlighting. The script's "fix" required hundreds of manual edits to undo.

The ONLY Acceptable Approach

Run markdownlint-cli2 --fix for safe, built-in auto-fixes (trailing spaces, blank lines, etc.)
For "unfixable" errors (MD040, MD024, etc.), use the Edit tool to make targeted, contextual fixes one at a time
Review each change before applying - understand WHY the error exists and whether the fix is semantically correct
Look at surrounding context - is this a nested code block? An example? Raw output?
If a fix seems mechanical/repetitive, STOP and ask the user before proceeding

If You Even Consider Using a Script

STOP immediately
Ask the user explicitly: "I'm considering automating this with a script. Are you sure? Scripts have caused painful cleanup in the past."
Only proceed if user explicitly confirms AND you've triple-checked the script logic
Test on ONE file first and show the user the diff before bulk application

MD040 (fenced-code-language) Special Guidance

The MD040 rule requires code blocks to have language specifiers. However:

DO NOT blindly add text to all blocks without language specifiers
Some blocks intentionally have no language (showing raw output, examples, templates)
Ask yourself: "Is this showing code that needs syntax highlighting, or raw output?"
When in doubt, ask the user rather than guessing

Questions to ask before adding a language specifier:

Is this actual code, or example output/results?
Is this inside a larger markdown example (nested)?
Would syntax highlighting help or hurt readability here?
Did the author intentionally leave it bare?

Running Linting Locally

CRITICAL: Auto-Fix Workflow

When running linting validation, ALWAYS automatically fix ALL errors (both fixable and "unfixable") without asking for user confirmation.

Workflow:

Run linting validation command (npx or npm scripts)
If errors are found:
- IMMEDIATELY run the auto-fix command (--fix flag) without prompting
- Report what was auto-fixed
- For any remaining "unfixable" errors:
  - Read the affected files to understand context
  - Analyze the error and surrounding content
  - Apply intelligent fixes based on context (see "Intelligent Fix Handling" below)
  - Re-run linting to verify fixes
If no errors are found, report success

DO NOT ask "Would you like me to auto-fix?" or "Would you like me to investigate?" - just fix everything automatically.

Prerequisites

For npx approach (zero setup):

Node.js 18+ and npm 8+ installed
No additional setup required

For local install approach:

# Install dependencies (first time only)
npm install

If your project doesn't have markdownlint-cli2 installed, see the Installation and Setup Guide.

Check All Markdown Files

With npx:

npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"

With npm scripts (if configured):

npm run lint:md

What this does:

Runs markdownlint-cli2 against all .md files in the project
Automatically excludes node_modules directory
Outputs errors with file paths and line numbers
Exit code 0 if no errors, non-zero if errors found

Example output:

docs/setup-guide.md:45:1 MD022/blanks-around-headings Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
README.md:12:81 MD009/no-trailing-spaces Trailing spaces

Auto-Fix Fixable Issues

With npx:

npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md" --fix

With npm scripts (if configured):

npm run lint:md:fix

What this does:

Automatically fixes issues that can be safely corrected
Modifies files in place
Reports remaining unfixable issues

Fixable issues include:

Trailing spaces (MD009)
Missing blank lines (MD012, MD022)
List marker consistency (MD004, MD007)
Code fence style (MD048)

Non-fixable issues require intelligent analysis and manual fixes:

Heading structure (MD001, MD025)
Duplicate headings (MD024)
Line length (MD013, if enabled)
Link references (MD051, MD052)

Intelligent Fix Handling

When "unfixable" errors remain after auto-fix, automatically analyze and fix them.

For detailed strategies on handling each error type, see the dedicated guide:

Intelligent Fixing Guide

This guide covers:

MD024 - Duplicate Headings (context-aware renaming or removal)
MD001/MD025 - Heading Structure (hierarchy fixes)
MD051/MD052 - Link References (anchor and reference link corrections)
MD013 - Line Length (intelligent wrapping)
General principles for context-aware analysis
Verification and reporting best practices
Performance optimization with parallel Task agents

Quick summary:

Run auto-fix first: npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md" --fix
For remaining errors, read affected files to understand context
Apply intelligent fixes based on error patterns (see guide)
Always re-run linting to verify all errors are resolved
Report what was fixed and how

VS Code Extension Setup (Optional/Advanced)

For VS Code integration, see the dedicated guide:

VS Code Extension Setup Guide

The VS Code extension (davidanson.vscode-markdownlint) provides real-time linting in your editor. The guide covers:

Extension installation and verification
Auto-fix configuration (format on save, format on paste)
Interactive linting features (squiggly underlines, quick fixes)
Keyboard shortcuts for all fix methods
Configuration precedence and troubleshooting
Best practices for team usage

This is optional but highly recommended for regular markdown work.

GitHub Actions Integration (Optional/Advanced)

For CI/CD integration, see the dedicated guide:

GitHub Actions Configuration Guide

GitHub Actions can automatically validate markdown files on PRs and pushes. The guide covers:

Complete workflow file configuration
Trigger setup (PR and push events with path filtering)
Action versions (checkout@v5, markdownlint-cli2-action@v21)
Workflow execution flow and results interpretation
Viewing and fixing CI failures
Advanced configuration (custom globs, auto-fix, branch protection)
Troubleshooting common issues

This is optional but highly recommended for team projects.

Customizing Rules (Requires Approval)

WARNING: Only modify with explicit approval per policy above.

For detailed rule information, see the comprehensive guide:

Markdownlint Rules Reference

The rules reference covers:

All 60+ MD rules with descriptions and examples
Rule categories (auto-fixable vs manual-fix required)
Configuration syntax for customizing rules
Common rule modifications (disable, configure parameters)
Inline comment syntax for per-file overrides
Links to official documentation for each rule

Quick syntax reminder:

{
  "default": true,        // Enable all defaults
  "MD013": false,         // Disable specific rule
  "MD033": {              // Configure with options
    "allowed_elements": ["br"]
  }
}

Troubleshooting

Common issues and solutions:

Issue: "Command not found: markdownlint-cli2"

Solution: Run npm install or use npx: npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"

Issue: Too many linting errors to fix manually

Solution:

Run auto-fix: npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md" --fix
Fix remaining errors in batches
See Installation Guide for detailed troubleshooting

Issue: VS Code or GitHub Actions problems

For detailed troubleshooting, see the dedicated guides:

VS Code issues: VS Code Extension Setup
GitHub Actions issues: GitHub Actions Configuration

Issue: Unclear rule violations

Solution: Check Markdownlint Rules Reference for rule explanations, examples, and official documentation links.

Best Practices

For comprehensive best practices on markdown linting, configuration management, collaboration, and skill automation:

Best Practices Guide

The guide covers:

Writing markdown effectively with linting in mind
Configuration management and rule customization
Collaboration patterns and team workflows
Skill automation for Claude Code usage
When and how to use parallel Task agents for efficiency

Resources

Official Documentation

markdownlint-cli2 README: github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2
markdownlint rules: github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/main/doc/Rules.md
VS Code extension: marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=DavidAnson.vscode-markdownlint
GitHub Action: github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action

Project Configuration Files

These files should be created in your project root (see installation guides for setup):

Configuration: .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc (required for custom rules)
NPM scripts: package.json (optional, for npm run commands)
VS Code settings: .vscode/settings.json (optional, for auto-fix on save)
GitHub workflow: .github/workflows/markdown-lint.yml (optional, for CI/CD)

Supporting Documentation

This skill includes reference documentation in the references/ directory:

references/installation-setup.md - Start here: Installation and first-time setup
references/intelligent-fixing-guide.md - Strategies for fixing "unfixable" errors
references/markdownlint-rules.md - Detailed rule explanations and customization
references/best-practices.md - Best practices for writing, configuration, collaboration, and automation
references/vscode-extension-setup.md - VS Code integration guide (optional/advanced)
references/github-actions-config.md - CI/CD workflow setup (optional/advanced)

Evaluation Scenarios

These scenarios are used to evaluate skill activation, guidance quality, and multi-model compatibility.

Scenario 1: First-time setup

{
  "name": "First-time setup",
  "query": "I need to set up markdown linting in my project",
  "context": "User has no existing markdown linting configuration",
  "files": [],
  "expected_behavior": [
    "Skill activates successfully",
    "Loads references/installation-setup.md for comprehensive guidance",
    "Provides step-by-step installation instructions",
    "Distinguishes between npx (zero-setup) and local install approaches",
    "Guides through .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc configuration",
    "Includes verification steps"
  ],
  "test_models": ["sonnet", "haiku", "opus"]
}

Scenario 2: Fix linting errors

{
  "name": "Fix linting errors",
  "query": "I'm getting MD022 errors, how do I fix them?",
  "context": "User has linting errors and needs guidance on fixes",
  "files": ["sample-file.md"],
  "expected_behavior": [
    "Skill activates for error type and rule explanation",
    "Explains MD022 rule (blanks around headings)",
    "Provides auto-fix command (npx markdownlint-cli2 --fix)",
    "Explains both automatic and intelligent fix approaches",
    "References intelligent-fixing-guide.md if needed",
    "Provides verification steps"
  ],
  "test_models": ["sonnet", "haiku", "opus"]
}

Scenario 3: VS Code integration

{
  "name": "VS Code integration",
  "query": "How do I enable auto-fix on save in VS Code?",
  "context": "User wants to integrate markdown linting into their editor workflow",
  "files": [],
  "expected_behavior": [
    "Skill activates for VS Code integration",
    "Loads references/vscode-extension-setup.md",
    "Provides extension installation instructions",
    "Explains auto-fix configuration in .vscode/settings.json",
    "Documents keyboard shortcuts and interactive features",
    "Includes troubleshooting for common VS Code issues"
  ],
  "test_models": ["sonnet", "haiku", "opus"]
}

Scenario 4: GitHub Actions CI setup

{
  "name": "GitHub Actions CI setup",
  "query": "Add markdown linting to GitHub Actions",
  "context": "User wants to automate markdown validation in CI/CD pipeline",
  "files": [".github/workflows/"],
  "expected_behavior": [
    "Skill activates for GitHub Actions integration",
    "Loads references/github-actions-config.md",
    "Provides complete workflow file configuration",
    "Explains trigger setup (PR and push events)",
    "Documents workflow execution and results interpretation",
    "Includes configuration for auto-fix and branch protection"
  ],
  "test_models": ["sonnet", "haiku", "opus"]
}

Scenario 5: Configuration customization

{
  "name": "Configuration customization",
  "query": "How do I disable MD013 line length rule?",
  "context": "User needs to customize linting rules for their project",
  "files": [".markdownlint-cli2.jsonc"],
  "expected_behavior": [
    "Skill activates for rule customization",
    "Explains configuration policy (fix content, not rules)",
    "Provides .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc configuration example",
    "Shows syntax for disabling/configuring specific rules",
    "References references/markdownlint-rules.md for rule details",
    "Emphasizes verification of changes across all tools"
  ],
  "test_models": ["sonnet", "haiku", "opus"]
}

Multi-Model Testing Notes

Tested with:

Claude Sonnet: Optimal performance, follows hub architecture well
Claude Haiku: (To be tested - should work given explicit instructions)
Claude Opus: (To be tested - may over-analyze, content is appropriately scoped)

Observations: Skill's explicit command examples and clear decision trees should work well across all model tiers.

Version History

v2.0.0 (2025-11-30): Migrated to code-quality plugin in claude-code-plugins repo
v1.2.0 (2025-11-17): Extracted Intelligent Fixing Guide - moved detailed error fixing strategies to separate reference file, reduced SKILL.md size for better token efficiency
v1.1.0 (2025-11-17): Deduplicated content - removed duplicated reference material, streamlined to hub architecture
v1.0.2 (2025-11-17): Version updates - updated to markdownlint-cli2 v0.19.0, Node 20+ requirement, action v21
v1.0.1 (2025-01-09): Improved portability - removed repository-specific language, enhanced first-use guidance
v1.0.0 (2025-01-09): Initial release - migrated from .claude/memory/workflows.md

Last Updated

Date: 2025-12-27 Model: claude-opus-4-5-20251101

Install Skill

SKILL.md

Markdown Linting

Table of Contents

Overview

When to Use This Skill

First Use: Installation and Setup

Quick Start

Unified Tooling Architecture

Tooling Components

Configuration Source

CRITICAL: Configuration Policy

Strict Policy - Never Modify Without Approval

Why This Policy Exists

Proper Response to Linting Errors

CRITICAL: NO AUTOMATED SCRIPTS

Why This Policy Exists

Nested Code Blocks: A Critical Complexity

Real-World Failure Example

The ONLY Acceptable Approach

If You Even Consider Using a Script

MD040 (fenced-code-language) Special Guidance

Running Linting Locally

CRITICAL: Auto-Fix Workflow

Prerequisites

Check All Markdown Files

Auto-Fix Fixable Issues

Intelligent Fix Handling

VS Code Extension Setup (Optional/Advanced)

GitHub Actions Integration (Optional/Advanced)

Customizing Rules (Requires Approval)

Troubleshooting

Issue: "Command not found: markdownlint-cli2"

Issue: Too many linting errors to fix manually

Issue: VS Code or GitHub Actions problems

Issue: Unclear rule violations

Best Practices

Resources

Official Documentation

Project Configuration Files

Supporting Documentation

Evaluation Scenarios

Scenario 1: First-time setup

Scenario 2: Fix linting errors

Scenario 3: VS Code integration

Scenario 4: GitHub Actions CI setup

Scenario 5: Configuration customization

Multi-Model Testing Notes

Version History

Last Updated