| name | model-selection |
| description | Choose appropriate model for custom agent tasks. Use when selecting between Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus for agents, optimizing cost vs quality tradeoffs, or matching model capability to task complexity. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Grep, Glob |
Model Selection Skill
Choose the right model for custom agent tasks based on complexity, cost, and performance requirements.
Purpose
Guide selection of appropriate Claude model (Haiku, Sonnet, Opus) for custom agent tasks to optimize cost, speed, and quality.
When to Use
- Designing a new custom agent
- Optimizing existing agent performance
- Balancing cost vs quality
- Meeting specific latency requirements
Model Overview
| Model | Speed | Cost | Quality | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku | Fastest | Lowest | Good | Simple tasks, high volume |
| Sonnet | Fast | Medium | Very Good | Most tasks, balanced |
| Opus | Slowest | Highest | Best | Complex reasoning |
Selection Decision Tree
START
│
├── Is task simple transformation?
│ └── YES → Haiku
│
├── Is cost the primary concern?
│ └── YES → Haiku (if adequate) or Sonnet
│
├── Is quality critical (no room for error)?
│ └── YES → Opus
│
├── Does task require complex reasoning?
│ └── YES → Opus
│
├── Is latency critical (real-time)?
│ └── YES → Haiku
│
└── DEFAULT → Sonnet (best balance)
Model Selection by Task Type
Haiku Tasks
Best for:
- Text transformations (uppercase, formatting)
- Simple classification
- Data extraction
- High-volume operations
- Real-time processing
- Pattern matching
# Haiku examples
model="claude-3-5-haiku-20241022"
# Echo agent - simple transformation
# Calculator - straightforward math
# Stream processor - high volume, low complexity
Sonnet Tasks
Best for:
- Code generation
- Code review
- Planning and analysis
- Most custom agents
- Balanced performance
# Sonnet examples
model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
# QA agent - codebase analysis
# Builder agent - code implementation
# General-purpose agents
Opus Tasks
Best for:
- Strategic planning
- Complex architectural decisions
- Critical code review
- Multi-step reasoning
- Novel problem solving
# Opus examples
model="claude-opus-4-20250514"
# Planner agent - strategic decisions
# Reviewer agent - critical validation
# Architect agent - system design
Cost Considerations
Relative Costs
| Model | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Relative Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku | Low | Low | 1x |
| Sonnet | Medium | Medium | ~10x |
| Opus | High | High | ~30x |
Cost Optimization Strategies
- Start with Haiku: Test if simpler model is adequate
- Use Haiku for preprocessing: Filter/classify before main task
- Reserve Opus for critical paths: Only where quality is paramount
- Monitor costs: Track
ResultMessage.total_cost_usd
# Cost tracking
async for message in client.receive_response():
if isinstance(message, ResultMessage):
print(f"Query cost: ${message.total_cost_usd:.6f}")
Speed Considerations
Latency Profiles
| Model | First Token | Total Time | Throughput |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku | ~500ms | Fast | Highest |
| Sonnet | ~1s | Medium | Good |
| Opus | ~2s | Slower | Lower |
Speed Optimization
- Real-time needs Haiku: Sub-second response
- Interactive needs Sonnet: Acceptable latency
- Batch allows Opus: Latency less critical
Quality Considerations
Capability Differences
| Capability | Haiku | Sonnet | Opus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple reasoning | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Code generation | Limited | Good | Excellent |
| Complex planning | Poor | Good | Excellent |
| Multi-step reasoning | Limited | Good | Excellent |
| Novel problems | Poor | Adequate | Excellent |
Quality Requirements
- Haiku: Acceptable for well-defined, simple tasks
- Sonnet: Good for most development tasks
- Opus: Required for critical decisions
Multi-Model Patterns
Tiered Processing
# Tier 1: Haiku for classification
classification = await classify_task(task, model="haiku")
# Tier 2: Route to appropriate model
if classification == "simple":
result = await process(task, model="haiku")
elif classification == "complex":
result = await process(task, model="opus")
else:
result = await process(task, model="sonnet")
Multi-Agent with Different Models
# Planner: Opus for strategic decisions
planner_options = ClaudeAgentOptions(
model="claude-opus-4-20250514"
)
# Builder: Sonnet for implementation
builder_options = ClaudeAgentOptions(
model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
)
# Reviewer: Opus for critical review
reviewer_options = ClaudeAgentOptions(
model="claude-opus-4-20250514"
)
Output Format
When recommending model selection:
## Model Selection
**Task:** [description]
**Recommended Model:** [Haiku/Sonnet/Opus]
### Decision Factors
| Factor | Weight | Assessment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Complexity | [H/M/L] | [assessment] |
| Cost sensitivity | [H/M/L] | [assessment] |
| Quality requirement | [H/M/L] | [assessment] |
| Latency requirement | [H/M/L] | [assessment] |
### Rationale
[Why this model is appropriate]
### Alternatives
- If cost is concern: [alternative]
- If quality is critical: [alternative]
### Configuration
options = ClaudeAgentOptions( model="[model-id]", ... )
Selection Checklist
- Task complexity assessed
- Cost constraints identified
- Quality requirements defined
- Latency requirements considered
- Model selected with rationale
- Alternatives documented
Key Insights
"Choose wisely: Claude Haiku for simple, fast tasks. Claude Sonnet for balanced performance. Claude Opus for complex reasoning."
Model selection directly impacts:
- User experience (latency)
- Operational cost (tokens)
- Output quality (accuracy)
Cross-References
- @core-four-custom.md - Model in Core Four
- @custom-agent-design skill - Agent design workflow
- @agent-deployment-forms.md - Deployment considerations
Version History
- v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release
Last Updated
Date: 2025-12-26 Model: claude-opus-4-5-20251101