Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

Advanced analytical framework for deep problem solving and multi-dimensional thinking. Systematically analyzes complex problems from technical, business, user, and system perspectives to generate comprehensive solutions with structured recommendations.

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name ultra-think
description Advanced analytical framework for deep problem solving and multi-dimensional thinking. Systematically analyzes complex problems from technical, business, user, and system perspectives to generate comprehensive solutions with structured recommendations.

Ultra Think Mode

Advanced analytical framework for systematic problem analysis and strategic decision-making.

Core Capabilities

  • Multi-dimensional problem analysis (technical, business, user, system perspectives)
  • Structured solution generation with trade-off analysis
  • Cross-domain thinking and innovation patterns
  • Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
  • Meta-analysis and confidence evaluation
  • Strategic planning and decision support

Methodology Framework

1. Initialize Ultra Think Mode

  • Acknowledge the request for enhanced analytical thinking
  • Set context for deep, systematic reasoning
  • Prepare to explore the problem space comprehensively

2. Parse the Problem or Question

  • Extract the core challenge from the user's input
  • Identify all stakeholders and constraints
  • Recognize implicit requirements and hidden complexities
  • Question assumptions and surface unknowns

3. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Approach the problem from multiple perspectives:

Technical Perspective

  • Analyze technical feasibility and constraints
  • Consider scalability, performance, and maintainability
  • Evaluate security implications
  • Assess technical debt and future-proofing

Business Perspective

  • Understand business value and ROI
  • Consider time-to-market pressures
  • Evaluate competitive advantages
  • Assess risk vs. reward trade-offs

User Perspective

  • Analyze user needs and pain points
  • Consider usability and accessibility
  • Evaluate user experience implications
  • Think about edge cases and user journeys

System Perspective

  • Consider system-wide impacts
  • Analyze integration points
  • Evaluate dependencies and coupling
  • Think about emergent behaviors

4. Generate Multiple Solutions

  • Brainstorm at least 3-5 different approaches
  • For each approach, consider:
    • Pros and cons
    • Implementation complexity
    • Resource requirements
    • Potential risks
    • Long-term implications
  • Include both conventional and creative solutions
  • Consider hybrid approaches

5. Deep Dive Analysis

For the most promising solutions:

  • Create detailed implementation plans
  • Identify potential pitfalls and mitigation strategies
  • Consider phased approaches and MVPs
  • Analyze second and third-order effects
  • Think through failure modes and recovery

6. Cross-Domain Thinking

  • Draw parallels from other industries or domains
  • Apply design patterns from different contexts
  • Consider biological or natural system analogies
  • Look for innovative combinations of existing solutions

7. Challenge and Refine

  • Play devil's advocate with each solution
  • Identify weaknesses and blind spots
  • Consider "what if" scenarios
  • Stress-test assumptions
  • Look for unintended consequences

8. Synthesize Insights

  • Combine insights from all perspectives
  • Identify key decision factors
  • Highlight critical trade-offs
  • Summarize innovative discoveries
  • Present a nuanced view of the problem space

9. Provide Structured Recommendations

Present findings in a clear structure:

## Problem Analysis
- Core challenge
- Key constraints
- Critical success factors

## Solution Options
### Option 1: [Name]
- Description
- Pros/Cons
- Implementation approach
- Risk assessment

### Option 2: [Name]
[Similar structure]

## Recommendation
- Recommended approach
- Rationale
- Implementation roadmap
- Success metrics
- Risk mitigation plan

## Alternative Perspectives
- Contrarian view
- Future considerations
- Areas for further research

10. Meta-Analysis

  • Reflect on the thinking process itself
  • Identify areas of uncertainty
  • Acknowledge biases or limitations
  • Suggest additional expertise needed
  • Provide confidence levels for recommendations

Usage Examples

# Architectural decision
/ultra-think Should we migrate to microservices or improve our monolith?

# Complex problem solving
/ultra-think How do we scale our system to handle 10x traffic while reducing costs?

# Strategic planning
/ultra-think What technology stack should we choose for our next-gen platform?

# Design challenge
/ultra-think How can we improve our API to be more developer-friendly while maintaining backward compatibility?

# Complex organizational decision
/ultra-think Should we invest in building internal tools or purchase existing solutions?

Key Principles

  • First Principles Thinking: Break down to fundamental truths
  • Systems Thinking: Consider interconnections and feedback loops
  • Probabilistic Thinking: Work with uncertainties and ranges
  • Inversion: Consider what to avoid, not just what to do
  • Second-Order Thinking: Consider consequences of consequences

Output Expectations

  • Comprehensive analysis (typically 2-4 pages of insights)
  • Multiple viable solutions with trade-offs
  • Clear reasoning chains
  • Acknowledgment of uncertainties
  • Actionable recommendations
  • Novel insights or perspectives

Input Requirements

  • Problem Statement: Clear description of the challenge or question
  • Context: Relevant background information (optional but helpful)
  • Constraints: Known limitations or requirements (optional)

Note: The framework works best with complex, multi-faceted problems that benefit from systematic analysis rather than simple technical questions.