Claude Code Plugins

Community-maintained marketplace

Feedback

council-decision

@mylukin/agent-council
20
0

Get multi-model AI consensus on complex questions using Claude, Codex, and Gemini

Install Skill

1Download skill
2Enable skills in Claude

Open claude.ai/settings/capabilities and find the "Skills" section

3Upload to Claude

Click "Upload skill" and select the downloaded ZIP file

Note: Please verify skill by going through its instructions before using it.

SKILL.md

name council-decision
description Get multi-model AI consensus on complex questions using Claude, Codex, and Gemini

Council Decision Skill

Get multi-model AI consensus on complex decisions using the agent-council's 3-stage voting pipeline.

When to Use

Automatically invoke this skill when facing:

  • Architectural design decisions that affect system structure
  • Technology stack choices with multiple valid options
  • Implementation approach evaluation for complex features
  • Design pattern selection when trade-offs are unclear
  • Multi-step planning for large tasks

How It Works

The skill runs the agent-council CLI which:

  1. Sends your question to Claude, Codex, and Gemini
  2. Each model provides an independent response
  3. Models peer-rank each other's answers
  4. A chairman synthesizes the final recommendation

Usage

When you encounter a complex decision point:

  1. Formulate the question clearly
  2. Run: agent-council "your question here"
  3. Wait for the 3-stage pipeline to complete
  4. Use the synthesized answer to guide implementation

Example Questions

  • "What's the best way to implement real-time updates: WebSockets, SSE, or polling?"
  • "Should this service use SQL or NoSQL database?"
  • "What caching strategy would work best for this API?"
  • "How should we structure error handling in this module?"

Prerequisites

The agent-council CLI must be installed:

npm install -g agent-council

Benefits

  • Reduced bias: Multiple AI models reduce single-model bias
  • Diverse perspectives: Different models have different strengths
  • Quality ranking: Peer evaluation identifies best answers
  • Synthesized wisdom: Chairman combines best insights