name	Test Structure Analysis
description	Analyze test code structure directly to provide coverage analysis

Test Structure Analysis Skill

This skill provides the ability to analyze test code structure directly from test files without running tests. It examines test files and source files to identify what is tested and what is not.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to:

Analyze test code organization without running tests
Identify files and functions without tests
Understand what e2e/integration tests cover
Find coverage gaps by examining test structure
Generate comprehensive test structure reports
Fast analysis (seconds, not minutes)

Prerequisites

Required Tools

Python 3.8+ for test structure analysis
Go toolchain for the target Go project

Installation

# Ensure Python 3.8+ is installed
python3 --version

# Go toolchain for target project
go version

How It Works

Note: This skill currently supports Go projects only.

Step 1: Discover Test and Source Files

The analyzer discovers test and source files based on Go conventions:

Test Files:

Files ending with _test.go
E2E/integration tests identified by:
- File naming patterns: *e2e*_test.go, *integration*_test.go
- Directory location: test/e2e/, test/integration/, e2e/, integration/
- Content markers: Ginkgo markers like [Serial], [Disruptive], g.Describe(, g.It(

Source Files:

Files ending with .go (excluding test files)
Optionally exclude vendor, generated code, etc.

Step 2: Parse Test Files

For each test file, extract:

Test functions/methods:
- Function name
- Line number range
- Test framework (Go testing, Ginkgo)
- Test type (unit, integration, e2e)
Test targets (what the test is testing):
- Imports and references to source files
- Function calls and instantiations
- Inferred from test names
Test metadata:
- Test descriptions/documentation
- Test tags/markers
- Helper functions

Example for Go:

// File: pkg/handler_test.go
package handler_test

import (
    "testing"
    "myapp/pkg/handler"
)

func TestHandleRequest(t *testing.T) {  // ← Test function
    h := handler.New()                   // ← Target: handler.New
    result := h.HandleRequest("test")    // ← Target: handler.HandleRequest
    // ...
}

Extraction result:

{
  "test_file": "pkg/handler_test.go",
  "source_file": "pkg/handler.go",
  "tests": [
    {
      "name": "TestHandleRequest",
      "lines": [6, 10],
      "targets": ["handler.New", "handler.HandleRequest"],
      "type": "unit"
    }
  ]
}

Step 3: Parse Source Files

For each source file, extract:

Functions/methods:
- Function name
- Line number range
- Visibility (public/private/exported)
- Parameters and return types
- Complexity metrics
Classes/structs:
- Type definitions
- Methods
- Fields

Example for Go:

// File: pkg/handler.go
package handler

type Handler struct {
    config Config
}

func New() *Handler {              // ← Function: New
    return &Handler{}
}

func (h *Handler) HandleRequest(req string) (string, error) {  // ← Function: HandleRequest
    if req == "" {
        return "", errors.New("empty request")
    }
    return process(req), nil
}

Extraction result:

{
  "source_file": "pkg/handler.go",
  "functions": [
    {
      "name": "New",
      "lines": [8, 10],
      "visibility": "exported",
      "complexity": 1
    },
    {
      "name": "HandleRequest",
      "lines": [12, 20],
      "visibility": "exported",
      "complexity": 3,
      "receiver": "Handler"
    }
  ]
}

Step 4: Map Tests to Source Code

Create a mapping between tests and source code:

Direct mapping (test file → source file):
- handler_test.go → handler.go
Function-level mapping (test → function):
- TestHandleRequest tests HandleRequest
Import-based mapping:
- Analyze imports in test files to identify tested modules

Mapping result:

{
  "pkg/handler.go": {
    "test_file": "pkg/handler_test.go",
    "functions": {
      "New": {
        "tested": true,
        "tests": ["TestHandleRequest"],
        "test_count": 1
      },
      "HandleRequest": {
        "tested": true,
        "tests": ["TestHandleRequest"],
        "test_count": 1
      }
    },
    "overall_tested_functions": 2,
    "overall_untested_functions": 0,
    "function_test_coverage": 100.0
  }
}

Step 5: Identify Coverage Gaps

Identify what is not tested:

Untested source files:
- Source files with no corresponding test file
- Priority: Based on file importance (exported functions)
Untested functions:
- Functions not referenced in any tests
- Priority: Exported/public functions > private functions
Partially tested files:
- Files with test file but missing tests for some functions

Gap categorization:

{
  "gaps": {
    "untested_files": [
      {
        "file": "pkg/config.go",
        "functions": 5,
        "exported_functions": 3,
        "priority": "high",
        "reason": "No corresponding test file found"
      }
    ],
    "untested_functions": [
      {
        "file": "pkg/handler.go",
        "function": "process",
        "visibility": "private",
        "priority": "low",
        "reason": "Not referenced in any tests"
      }
    ]
  },
  "summary": {
    "total_source_files": 45,
    "files_with_tests": 30,
    "files_without_tests": 15,
    "total_functions": 234,
    "tested_functions": 189,
    "untested_functions": 45,
    "function_coverage_percentage": 80.8
  }
}

Step 6: Generate Reports

IMPORTANT: Claude Code generates all three report formats at runtime based on the analyzer's structured output. The analyzer script returns structured data (as JSON to stdout or via Python data structures), and Claude Code is responsible for generating all report files.

The analyzer generates structured data containing full analysis results. Claude Code reads this data and generates three report formats:

1. JSON Report (`test-structure-report.json`)

Generated by: Claude Code at runtime based on analyzer output

Machine-readable format containing full analysis data. See Step 5 for structure.

How to generate:

Read structured data from analyzer (returned as JSON to stdout)
Write to JSON file with indent=2 for readability

2. Text Summary (`test-structure-summary.txt`)

Generated by: Claude Code at runtime based on analyzer output

Terminal-friendly summary showing:

Overall statistics (files with/without tests, function coverage)
High-priority gaps
Recommendations

Format Structure:

============================================================
Test Structure Analysis
============================================================

File: {filename}
Language: {language}
Analysis Date: {timestamp}

============================================================
Coverage Summary
============================================================

Total Source Files:    {count}
Files With Tests:      {count} ({percentage}%)
Files Without Tests:   {count} ({percentage}%)

Total Functions:       {count}
Tested Functions:      {count} ({percentage}%)
Untested Functions:    {count} ({percentage}%)

============================================================
High Priority Gaps
============================================================

UNTESTED FILES:
  1. {filepath} - {reason} ({function_count} functions, {exported_count} exported)
  ...

UNTESTED FUNCTIONS:
  1. {filepath}::{function} - {reason} (visibility: {visibility})
  ...

============================================================
Recommendations
============================================================

Current Coverage: {current}%
Target Coverage: {target}%

Focus on addressing HIGH priority gaps first to maximize
test coverage and ensure production readiness.

3. HTML Report (`test-structure-report.html`)

Generated by: Claude Code at runtime based on analyzer output

Interactive HTML report with:

Required Sections:

Header with project info, language, and generation timestamp
Summary Dashboard with score cards showing:
- Total source files and files with/without tests
- Function coverage percentage
- High-priority gap count
Untested Files Table with columns:
- File path
- Function count
- Exported function count
- Priority (high/medium/low)
Untested Functions Table with columns:
- File path
- Function name
- Visibility (exported/private)
- Complexity score
- Priority
Recommendations Section grouped by priority

Styling:

Use the same CSS as gaps skill (modern gradient, cards, tables)
Priority badges: high (red), medium (orange), low (blue)
Escape all content with html.escape()

Implementation Steps

When implementing this skill in a command:

Step 0: Generate Analyzer Script at Runtime

CRITICAL: Before running any analysis, generate the analyzer script from the reference implementation.

# Create output directory
mkdir -p .work/test-coverage/analyze/

# Generate the analyzer script from the specification below
# Claude Code will write test_structure_analyzer.py based on the Analyzer Specification section

Analyzer Specification:

Generate a Python script (test_structure_analyzer.py) that analyzes Go test structure without running tests:

Input: Path or URL to a Go test file or directory Output: Structured JSON data printed to stdout, plus optional text summary to stderr

Core Algorithm:

Input Processing (handle URLs and local paths):
- Check if input starts with http:// or https://
- If URL: Use urllib.request.urlopen() to fetch content, save to temp file
- If local path: Use directly
- After analysis: Clean up temp file if created
- Note: Directory URLs not supported, only single file URLs
File Discovery:
- Test files: *_test.go (exclude vendor, generated code)
- E2E tests: Files in test/e2e/, test/integration/, or containing [Serial], [Disruptive] markers
- Source files: *.go (exclude *_test.go, vendor)
Test Parsing (regex-based):
- Ginkgo: (?:g\.|o\.)?It\(\s*["']([^"']+)["'] → extract test name, line number
- Standard Go: func (Test\w+)\(t \*testing\.T\) → extract test function name
- Extract targets (functions called): regex for \w+\([^)]*\) inside test body
Source File Analysis:
- Parse function definitions: func (\w+)\( or func \(\w+ \*?\w+\) (\w+)\(
- Track exported vs unexported (capitalized vs lowercase first letter)
Test-to-Source Mapping:
- Convention: handler_test.go → handler.go
- Function-level: Match test names to source function names (e.g., TestHandleRequest → HandleRequest)
- Import analysis: Parse import statements in test files
Single File Mode (when input is a file, not directory):
- Analyze only the test file structure
- Extract: test count, test names, imports, line numbers
- Skip source file mapping and gap detection
- Output: Test structure analysis only
Output Format (JSON to stdout):

{
  "language": "go",
  "source_dir": "/path/to/src",
  "test_only_mode": false,
  "summary": {
    "total_source_files": 45,
    "total_test_files": 32,
    "untested_files_count": 8
  },
  "test_file_details": {
    "path": "/path/to/test.go",
    "test_count": 15,
    "tests": [
      {"name": "TestFoo", "line_start": 10, "line_end": 20, "targets": ["Foo", "Bar"]}
    ],
    "imports": ["testing", "github.com/onsi/ginkgo"]
  }
}

Command-line Interface:

python3 .work/test-coverage/analyze/test_structure_analyzer.py <source-path> [--test-structure-only] [--output <dir>]

Why Runtime Generation:

Claude Code generates the analyzer from this specification
No separate .py file to maintain
SKILL.md is the single source of truth
Simpler and more maintainable

Step 1: Validate Inputs

Check that source directory exists and detect language if not specified.

Step 2: Execute Test Structure Analyzer

# Run analyzer (outputs structured JSON to stdout)
python3 .work/test-coverage/analyze/test_structure_analyzer.py \
    <source-directory> \
    --priority <priority> \
    --output-json

The analyzer will output structured JSON to stdout containing:

Test file analysis
Source file analysis
Test-to-source mappings
Coverage gaps
Summary statistics

Step 3: Generate All Three Report Formats at Runtime

IMPORTANT: Claude Code generates all three report formats based on the analyzer's structured output.

3.1: Capture and Parse Analyzer Output

import json
import subprocess

# Run analyzer and capture JSON output
result = subprocess.run(
    ['python3', '.work/test-coverage/analyze/test_structure_analyzer.py', source_dir, '--output-json'],
    capture_output=True,
    text=True
)

# Parse structured data
analysis_data = json.loads(result.stdout)

3.2: Generate JSON Report

json_path = '.work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.json'
with open(json_path, 'w') as f:
    json.dump(analysis_data, f, indent=2)

3.3: Generate Text Summary Report

Follow the text format specification in Step 6 to generate a terminal-friendly summary.

text_path = '.work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-summary.txt'
# Generate text content following format in Step 6
with open(text_path, 'w') as f:
    f.write(text_content)

3.4: Generate HTML Report

Follow the HTML specification in Step 6 to generate an interactive report.

html_path = '.work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.html'
# Generate HTML content following specification in Step 6
with open(html_path, 'w') as f:
    f.write(html_content)

Step 4: Display Results

Show summary and report locations to user:

Test Structure Analysis Complete

Reports Generated:
  ✓ HTML:  .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.html
  ✓ JSON:  .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.json
  ✓ Text:  .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-summary.txt

⚠️ MANDATORY PRE-COMPLETION VALIDATION

CRITICAL: Before declaring this skill complete, you MUST execute ALL validation checks below. Failure to validate is considered incomplete execution.

Validation Checklist

Execute these verification steps in order. ALL must pass:

1. File Existence Check

# Verify all three reports exist
test -f .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.html && echo "✓ HTML exists" || echo "✗ HTML MISSING"
test -f .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.json && echo "✓ JSON exists" || echo "✗ JSON MISSING"
test -f .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-summary.txt && echo "✓ Text exists" || echo "✗ Text MISSING"

Required: All three files must exist. If any are missing, regenerate them.

2. Test Case Extraction Verification

# Verify test cases were extracted
python3 << 'EOF'
import json
try:
    with open('.work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.json', 'r') as f:
        data = json.load(f)

    test_count = data.get('summary', {}).get('test_cases_count', 0)

    if test_count > 0:
        print(f"✓ Test cases extracted: {test_count}")
    else:
        print("✗ NO TEST CASES FOUND - verify test file contains Ginkgo tests")
        exit(1)
except Exception as e:
    print(f"✗ ERROR: {e}")
    exit(1)
EOF

Required: Test cases must be extracted. Zero test cases indicates a parsing issue.

3. HTML Report Structure Verification

# Verify HTML has required sections
grep -q "<h2>Test Cases" .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.html && \
  echo "✓ Test Cases section present" || \
  echo "✗ MISSING: Test Cases section"

grep -q "<h2>Coverage Summary" .work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.html && \
  echo "✓ Coverage Summary section present" || \
  echo "✗ MISSING: Coverage Summary section"

Required: HTML must have all structural sections.

4. JSON Structure Verification

# Verify JSON has all required fields
python3 << 'EOF'
import json
try:
    with open('.work/test-coverage/analyze/test-structure-report.json', 'r') as f:
        data = json.load(f)

    required_fields = [
        ('summary.language', lambda d: d['summary']['language']),
        ('summary.test_cases_count', lambda d: d['summary']['test_cases_count']),
        ('test_cases', lambda d: d['test_cases']),
    ]

    missing = []
    for name, getter in required_fields:
        try:
            getter(data)
            print(f"✓ {name}")
        except (KeyError, TypeError):
            print(f"✗ MISSING: {name}")
            missing.append(name)

    if not missing:
        print("\n✓ All required JSON fields present")
    else:
        print(f"\n✗ INCOMPLETE: Missing {len(missing)} required fields")
        exit(1)
except Exception as e:
    print(f"✗ ERROR: {e}")
    exit(1)
EOF

Required: All required JSON fields must be present.

Validation Summary

Before declaring this skill complete:

✓ All three report files exist
✓ Test cases successfully extracted (count > 0)
✓ HTML has all required sections
✓ JSON contains all required fields

If ANY check fails: Fix the issue and re-run all validation checks. Do NOT declare the skill complete until ALL checks pass.

Error Handling

Common Issues and Solutions

Unable to parse test/source files:
- Use fallback regex-based parsing
- Log warnings for unparseable files
- Continue with partial analysis
No test files found:
- Check if test patterns are correct for the Go project
- Ensure test files follow *_test.go naming convention
Complex project structures:
- Allow excluding certain directories via --exclude

Examples

Example 1: Go Project - Basic Analysis

# Analyze test structure for Go project
python3 .work/test-coverage/analyze/test_structure_analyzer.py /path/to/go/project

# Output:
# Language: go
# Discovered 45 source files, 32 test files
# Function coverage: 80.8% (189/234 functions tested)
# High priority gaps: 8 files without tests

Example 2: Go Project with Filters

# Analyze only high-priority gaps
python3 .work/test-coverage/analyze/test_structure_analyzer.py /path/to/go/project \
    --priority high \
    --exclude "*/vendor/*" \
    --output reports/test-gaps/

Example 3: Single Test File Analysis

# Analyze single test file structure
python3 .work/test-coverage/analyze/test_structure_analyzer.py ./test/e2e/networking/infw.go \
    --test-structure-only \
    --output ./reports/

Integration with Claude Code Commands

This skill is used by:

/test-coverage:analyze <source-dir>

The command invokes this skill to perform test structure analysis without running tests.

Install Skill

SKILL.md

Test Structure Analysis Skill

When to Use This Skill

Prerequisites

Required Tools

Installation

How It Works

Step 1: Discover Test and Source Files

Step 2: Parse Test Files

Step 3: Parse Source Files

Step 4: Map Tests to Source Code

Step 5: Identify Coverage Gaps

Step 6: Generate Reports

1. JSON Report (test-structure-report.json)

2. Text Summary (test-structure-summary.txt)

3. HTML Report (test-structure-report.html)

Implementation Steps

Step 0: Generate Analyzer Script at Runtime

Step 1: Validate Inputs

Step 2: Execute Test Structure Analyzer

Step 3: Generate All Three Report Formats at Runtime

3.1: Capture and Parse Analyzer Output

3.2: Generate JSON Report

3.3: Generate Text Summary Report

3.4: Generate HTML Report

Step 4: Display Results

⚠️ MANDATORY PRE-COMPLETION VALIDATION

Validation Checklist

1. File Existence Check

2. Test Case Extraction Verification

3. HTML Report Structure Verification

4. JSON Structure Verification

Validation Summary

Error Handling

Common Issues and Solutions

Examples

Example 1: Go Project - Basic Analysis

Example 2: Go Project with Filters

Example 3: Single Test File Analysis

Integration with Claude Code Commands

See Also

1. JSON Report (`test-structure-report.json`)

2. Text Summary (`test-structure-summary.txt`)

3. HTML Report (`test-structure-report.html`)