| name | Create Jira Bug |
| description | Implementation guide for creating well-formed Jira bug reports |
Create Jira Bug
This skill provides implementation guidance for creating well-structured Jira bug reports with complete reproduction steps and clear problem descriptions.
When to Use This Skill
This skill is automatically invoked by the /jira:create bug command to guide the bug creation process.
Prerequisites
- MCP Jira server configured and accessible
- User has permissions to create issues in the target project
- Bug information available (problem description, steps to reproduce, etc.)
Bug Report Best Practices
Complete Information
A good bug report contains:
- Clear summary - Brief description that identifies the problem
- Detailed description - Complete context and background
- Reproducibility - How often the bug occurs
- Steps to reproduce - Exact sequence to trigger the bug
- Actual vs expected results - What happens vs what should happen
- Environment details - Version, platform, configuration
- Additional context - Logs, screenshots, error messages
Summary Guidelines
The summary should:
- Be concise (one sentence)
- Identify the problem clearly
- Include key context when helpful
- Avoid vague terms like "broken" or "doesn't work"
Good examples:
- "API server returns 500 error when creating namespaces"
- "Control plane pods crash on upgrade from 4.20 to 4.21"
- "Memory leak in etcd container after 24 hours"
Bad examples:
- "Things are broken"
- "Error in production"
- "Fix the bug"
Bug Description Template
Use this template structure for consistency:
Description of problem:
<Clear, detailed description of the issue>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
<e.g., 4.21.0, openshift-client-4.20.5>
How reproducible:
<Always | Sometimes | Rarely>
Steps to Reproduce:
1. <First step - be specific>
2. <Second step>
3. <Third step>
Actual results:
<What actually happens - include error messages>
Expected results:
<What should happen instead>
Additional info:
<Logs, screenshots, stack traces, related issues, workarounds>
Interactive Bug Collection Workflow
When creating a bug, guide the user through each section interactively:
1. Problem Description
Prompt: "What is the problem? Describe it clearly and in detail."
Tips to share:
- Provide context: What were you trying to do?
- Be specific: What component or feature is affected?
- Include impact: Who is affected? How severe is it?
Example response:
The kube-apiserver pod crashes immediately after upgrading a hosted control plane cluster from version 4.20 to 4.21. The pod enters CrashLoopBackOff state and all API requests to the cluster fail.
2. Version Information
Prompt: "Which version exhibits this issue? (e.g., 4.21.0, 4.20.5)"
Tips:
- Include full version number if known
- Specify component version if different from platform version
- Note if issue affects multiple versions
Default: Use project-specific default (e.g., 4.21 for OCPBUGS)
3. Reproducibility
Prompt: "How reproducible is this issue?"
Options:
- Always - Happens every time following the steps
- Sometimes - Happens intermittently, even with same steps
- Rarely - Hard to reproduce, happened once or few times
Use case for each:
- Always: Easiest to debug and fix
- Sometimes: May be timing-related or race condition
- Rarely: May be environmental or complex interaction
4. Steps to Reproduce
Prompt: "What are the exact steps to reproduce this issue? Be as specific as possible."
Guidelines:
- Number each step
- Be precise (exact commands, button clicks, inputs)
- Include environment setup if needed
- Use code blocks for commands
- Mention any prerequisites
Example:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a ROSA HCP cluster on version 4.20.0:
rosa create cluster --name test-cluster --version 4.20.0 --hosted-cp
2. Wait for cluster to be fully ready (about 15 minutes)
3. Initiate upgrade to 4.21.0:
rosa upgrade cluster --cluster test-cluster --version 4.21.0
4. Monitor the control plane pods:
oc get pods -n clusters-test-cluster -w
5. Observe kube-apiserver pod status
Validation:
- Ensure at least one step is provided
- Check that steps are numbered/ordered
- Verify steps are specific enough to follow
5. Actual Results
Prompt: "What actually happens when you follow those steps?"
Guidelines:
- Describe exactly what occurs
- Include error messages (full text)
- Mention symptoms (crashes, hangs, wrong output)
- Include relevant logs or stack traces
- Note timing (immediate, after 5 minutes, etc.)
Example:
Actual results:
The kube-apiserver pod crashes immediately after the upgrade completes. The pod restarts continuously (CrashLoopBackOff). Error in pod logs:
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x...]
API requests to the cluster fail with:
Error from server: error dialing backend: dial tcp: lookup kube-apiserver: no such host
6. Expected Results
Prompt: "What should happen instead? What is the expected behavior?"
Guidelines:
- Describe the correct behavior
- Be specific about expected state/output
- Contrast with actual results
Example:
Expected results:
The kube-apiserver pod should start successfully after the upgrade. The pod should be in Running state, and API requests to the cluster should succeed normally.
Validation:
- Ensure expected results differ from actual results
- Check that expected behavior is clearly stated
7. Additional Information
Prompt: "Any additional context? (Optional: logs, screenshots, workarounds, related issues)"
Helpful additions:
- Full logs or log excerpts
- Screenshots or recordings
- Stack traces
- Related Jira issues or documentation
- Workarounds discovered
- Impact assessment (severity, affected users)
- Environment specifics (region, network config, etc.)
Example:
Additional info:
- Cluster ID: abc123-def456
- Region: us-east-1
- Full pod logs attached: kube-apiserver.log
- Related issue: OCPBUGS-12340 (similar crash in 4.19→4.20 upgrade)
- Workaround: Rollback to 4.20.0 and cluster recovers
- Affects all ROSA HCP clusters in production
Component and Version Handling
Auto-Detection
Analyze the bug description for component hints:
- Product names: "OpenShift", "ROSA", "ARO", "HyperShift"
- Component names: "API server", "etcd", "networking", "storage"
- Platform: "AWS", "Azure", "GCP", "bare metal"
Version Fields
Different projects may use versions differently:
OCPBUGS:
- Affects Version/s (
versions): Version where bug was found - Target Version (
customfield_12319940): Version where fix is targeted - Never set Fix Version/s (
fixVersions)
General projects:
- May only have Affects Version/s
- Check project configuration for version fields
Project-Specific Overrides
If bug is for a known project with specific conventions (e.g., CNTRLPLANE/OCPBUGS), the cntrlplane skill will be invoked automatically and will override defaults.
Field Validation
Before submitting the bug, validate:
Required Fields
- ✅ Summary is not empty and is clear
- ✅ Description contains problem description
- ✅ Component is specified (or project doesn't require it)
- ✅ Affects version is specified (if required by project)
Description Quality
- ✅ "Steps to Reproduce" has at least one step
- ✅ "Actual results" is different from "Expected results"
- ✅ "How reproducible" is specified (Always/Sometimes/Rarely)
Security
- ✅ No credentials, API keys, or secrets in any field
- ✅ Logs are sanitized (passwords, tokens redacted)
- ✅ Screenshots don't expose sensitive information
MCP Tool Parameters
Basic Bug Creation
mcp__atlassian__jira_create_issue(
project_key="<PROJECT_KEY>", # e.g., "OCPBUGS", "MYPROJECT"
summary="<bug summary>",
issue_type="Bug",
description="<formatted bug template>",
components="<component name>", # optional, if required by project
additional_fields={
"versions": [{"name": "<version>"}], # affects version, if supported
# Add other project-specific fields as needed
}
)
With Project-Specific Fields (e.g., OCPBUGS)
mcp__atlassian__jira_create_issue(
project_key="OCPBUGS",
summary="Control plane pods crash on upgrade",
issue_type="Bug",
description="""
h2. Description of problem
Control plane pods crash immediately after upgrading from 4.20 to 4.21.
h2. Version-Release number
4.21.0
h2. How reproducible
Always
h2. Steps to Reproduce
# Create a cluster on 4.20
# Upgrade to 4.21
# Observe control plane pod status
h2. Actual results
Pods enter CrashLoopBackOff state.
h2. Expected results
Pods should start successfully.
h2. Additional info
Logs attached.
""",
components="HyperShift",
additional_fields={
"versions": [{"name": "4.21"}], # affects version
"customfield_12319940": "4.21", # target version
"labels": ["ai-generated-jira"],
"security": {"name": "Red Hat Employee"} # if required
}
)
Jira Description Formatting
Use Jira's native formatting (Wiki markup):
Headings
h1. Main Heading
h2. Subheading
h3. Sub-subheading
Text Formatting
*bold text*
_italic text_
{{monospace}}
{quote}quoted text{quote}
Lists
* Bullet item 1
* Bullet item 2
** Nested bullet
# Numbered item 1
# Numbered item 2
Code Blocks
{code}
command line text or code
{code}
{code:java}
// Language-specific syntax highlighting
public class Example {}
{code}
Links
[Link text|http://example.com]
[OCPBUGS-123] // Auto-links to Jira issue
Error Handling
Missing Required Information
Scenario: User doesn't provide required fields.
Action:
- Identify missing required fields
- Prompt user for each missing field
- Provide context/examples to help
- Re-validate before submission
Example:
Summary is required but not provided. Please provide a brief summary of the bug:
Example: "API server crashes when creating namespaces"
Invalid Version
Scenario: Specified version doesn't exist in project.
Action:
- Use
mcp__atlassian__jira_get_project_versionsto fetch valid versions - Suggest closest match or list available versions
- Ask user to confirm or select different version
Example:
Version "4.21.5" not found for project OCPBUGS.
Available versions: 4.19, 4.20, 4.21, 4.22
Did you mean "4.21"?
Component Required But Not Provided
Scenario: Project requires component, but none specified.
Action:
- Ask user which component the bug affects
- If available, fetch and display component list for project
- Accept user's component selection
- Validate component exists before submission
Security Validation Failure
Scenario: Sensitive data detected in bug content.
Action:
- STOP submission immediately
- Inform user what type of data was detected (without echoing it)
- Provide guidance on redaction
- Request sanitized version
Example:
I detected what appears to be an API token in the "Steps to Reproduce" section.
Please replace with a placeholder like "YOUR_API_TOKEN" or "<redacted>" before proceeding.
MCP Tool Error
Scenario: MCP tool returns an error when creating the bug.
Action:
- Parse error message
- Translate to user-friendly explanation
- Suggest corrective action
- Offer to retry
Common errors:
- "Field 'component' is required" → Prompt for component
- "Version not found" → Use version error handling
- "Permission denied" → User may lack project permissions, inform them to contact admin
Examples
Example 1: Simple Bug
Input:
/jira:create bug MYPROJECT "Login button doesn't work on mobile"
Interactive prompts:
What is the problem? Describe it clearly.
> The login button on the mobile app doesn't respond to taps on iOS devices.
Which version exhibits this issue?
> 2.1.0
How reproducible is this issue?
> Always
What are the exact steps to reproduce?
> 1. Open mobile app on iPhone 13 (iOS 16.5)
> 2. Navigate to login screen
> 3. Tap the "Login" button
> 4. Nothing happens
What actually happens?
> The button doesn't respond to taps. No visual feedback, no navigation.
What should happen instead?
> The button should navigate to the credentials input screen when tapped.
Any additional context?
> Works fine on Android. Only affects iOS.
Result:
- Issue created in MYPROJECT
- Type: Bug
- Summary: "Login button doesn't work on mobile"
- Description: Formatted with bug template
Example 2: Bug with Auto-Detection (CNTRLPLANE/OCPBUGS)
Input:
/jira:create bug "ROSA HCP control plane pods crash on upgrade"
Auto-applied (via cntrlplane skill):
- Project: OCPBUGS (default for bugs)
- Component: HyperShift / ROSA (detected from "ROSA HCP")
- Affects Version: 4.21
- Target Version: 4.21
- Labels: ai-generated-jira
- Security: Red Hat Employee
Interactive prompts:
- Bug template sections (same as Example 1)
Result:
- Full bug report created with all CNTRLPLANE conventions applied
Example 3: Bug with All Fields Provided
Input:
/jira:create bug OCPBUGS "etcd pod OOMKilled after 48 hours" --component "HyperShift" --version "4.21"
Minimal prompts:
- Description of problem
- Steps to reproduce
- Actual/expected results
- Additional info
Result:
- Bug created with provided component and version
- Only prompts for description content
Best Practices Summary
- Clear summaries: One sentence, specific problem
- Complete steps: Exact sequence to reproduce
- Specific results: Include error messages and symptoms
- Sanitize content: Remove all credentials and secrets
- Add context: Logs, environment details, workarounds
- Use template: Follow standard bug template structure
- Validate before submit: Check all required fields populated
Workflow Summary
- ✅ Parse command arguments (project, summary, flags)
- 🔍 Auto-detect component/version from summary keywords
- ⚙️ Apply project-specific defaults (if applicable)
- 💬 Interactively collect bug template sections
- 🔒 Scan for sensitive data
- ✅ Validate required fields
- 📝 Format description with Jira markup
- ✅ Create bug via MCP tool
- 📤 Return issue key and URL
See Also
/jira:create- Main command that invokes this skillcntrlplaneskill - CNTRLPLANE/OCPBUGS specific conventions- Jira documentation on bug workflows