| name | stress-testing |
| description | Stress-test plans, proposals, and strategies. Use for pre-mortems, assumption audits, risk registers, evaluating business ideas, identifying failure modes, or when you need devil's advocate analysis before committing resources. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, WebSearch |
Stress Testing
Finding the flaws before they find you.
When to Use
- Before committing engineering time
- Before choosing a roadmap direction
- Before betting on an architecture
- When evaluating a business proposal
- When something "feels risky" but you can't articulate why
Process
- Summarize the plan - Neutral wording, 2-4 bullets
- Extract assumptions - What must be true for this to work?
- Run pre-mortem - Imagine failure, work backward
- Build risk register - Likelihood, impact, mitigation
- Define kill criteria - When should we stop?
- Propose experiments - Cheap ways to validate
Output Contract
Structure every stress-test as:
## Plan Summary
[2-4 bullets, neutral wording]
## Must-Be-True Assumptions
| Assumption | How to Verify | Fastest Disproof |
|------------|---------------|------------------|
| ... | ... | ... |
## Pre-Mortem: It's 1 Year Later, This Failed
| Failure Mode | Warning Signal | Prevention |
|--------------|----------------|------------|
| ... | ... | ... |
## Risk Register
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | Fallback |
|------|------------|--------|------------|----------|
| ... | H/M/L | H/M/L | ... | ... |
## Kill Criteria
- [ ] [Condition that should stop this plan]
- [ ] [Another stop condition]
## Experiments to Run
- [ ] [Cheap test] - Success metric: [...]
- [ ] [Another test] - Success metric: [...]
Fundamental Questions
For Any Idea
- What would have to be true for this to work?
- What are we assuming that we haven't validated?
- What's the weakest link in this chain?
- If this fails, what's the most likely cause?
- Who has tried this before, and what happened?
For Claims
- What's the evidence?
- Is the source credible and disinterested?
- What would change my mind?
- What's the null hypothesis?
- Am I being told what I want to hear?
For Plans
- What's the first thing that will go wrong?
- What dependencies are we not seeing?
- What happens if it takes 2x longer or costs 2x more?
- Who's accountable if this fails?
- What's the rollback plan?
Pre-Mortem Technique
The Method
Imagine it's one year from now. The project has failed spectacularly. Now:
- What went wrong?
- What were the warning signs we ignored?
- What did we assume that turned out to be false?
- What did we not plan for?
- Who saw this coming and wasn't heard?
Why It Works
- Gives permission to voice concerns
- Overcomes optimism bias
- Surfaces hidden risks
- Generates specific failure modes
- Removes social pressure to be positive
Questions to Ask
- "What's the most likely way this fails?"
- "What's the most catastrophic way this fails?"
- "What assumption, if wrong, kills this?"
- "What's the thing we're not talking about?"
Common Failure Patterns
Planning Fallacies
- Optimism bias: Best case becomes the plan
- Anchoring: First estimate becomes the baseline
- Conjunction fallacy: Plan requires everything to go right
- Survivorship bias: We only see what succeeded
Ask: What if every step takes 50% longer? What if three things go wrong simultaneously?
Assumption Traps
- Untested assumptions: "Users will love this"
- Implicit assumptions: Things so obvious no one states them
- Stale assumptions: True once, maybe not now
- Borrowed assumptions: "That's how [BigCo] does it"
Ask: Can we list every assumption? Which have we actually validated?
Complexity Blindness
- Hidden dependencies: A needs B needs C needs...
- Integration risk: Parts work, whole doesn't
- Second-order effects: Solving X creates Y
- Coordination costs: More people ≠ faster
Ask: What's the real dependency graph? What happens at the interfaces?
Market Delusions
- "Build it and they will come": They won't
- "We just need 1% of the market": That 1% is fought over fiercely
- "No competition": Either you're wrong or there's no market
- "First mover advantage": Often means first to make mistakes
Ask: Who specifically will buy this? Why haven't they bought the alternatives?
Red Flags
In Communication
- "Trust me on this"
- "It's obvious that..."
- "Everyone knows..."
- "There's no downside"
- "This can't fail"
- "We'll figure it out later"
- Confident timelines for unprecedented work
In Planning
- No contingency budget (time or money)
- Single points of failure
- Success requires perfect execution
- No one is explicitly responsible
- Risks acknowledged but not mitigated
- "We'll move fast and iterate"
In Reasoning
- Confirming evidence only
- Dismissing counterexamples
- Moving goalposts
- Circular logic
- Appeal to authority without substance
- "It worked at [other company]"
In Teams
- No one plays devil's advocate
- Dissent is discouraged
- The loudest voice wins
- Sunk cost driving decisions
- Groupthink in action
- "We've always done it this way"
Stress Tests
The 10x Test
- What if usage is 10x what we expect?
- What if it takes 10x longer?
- What if it costs 10x more?
- What if we have 1/10 the resources?
The Adversary Test
- What would a competitor do to beat this?
- What would a malicious actor exploit?
- What would a hostile regulator target?
- What would a disgruntled user complain about?
The Scalability Test
- Does this work with 10 users? 1000? 1M?
- Does this work with 1 person? 10? 100?
- Does this work in 1 market? 10? 50?
- What breaks first at scale?
The Time Test
- Will this still make sense in 6 months?
- What changes in the environment could invalidate this?
- Are we building for now or for then?
- What's the shelf life of this decision?
The Dependency Test
- What external factors must remain true?
- What happens if [key partner] disappears?
- What happens if [key person] leaves?
- What happens if [key assumption] changes?
Constructive Skepticism
How to Challenge Without Crushing
- "Help me understand..."
- "What if we're wrong about..."
- "I want to stress-test this assumption..."
- "Let's imagine this fails—why did it fail?"
- "What would the skeptic in the room ask?"
Pairing Problems with Possibilities
- "This seems risky because X. Could we mitigate by Y?"
- "I'm worried about A. Have we considered B?"
- "This fails if C. What's our plan for C?"
Knowing When to Stop
- Don't block, flag
- Skepticism serves the decision, not itself
- Once risks are surfaced and considered, step back
- "I've raised my concerns; I'll support whatever we decide"
Biases to Watch
In Others
- Confirmation bias: Seeking only supporting evidence
- Sunk cost fallacy: Continuing because of past investment
- Availability heuristic: Overweighting recent or vivid examples
- Authority bias: Believing because of who said it
- Bandwagon effect: Believing because others do
In Yourself
- Contrarian bias: Disagreeing for its own sake
- Status quo bias: Favoring inaction
- Pessimism bias: Overweighting negative outcomes
- Negativity bias: Remembering failures more than successes
- Cynicism: Assuming bad faith
The Antidote
- "What would change my mind?"
- "Am I being skeptical or just negative?"
- "Is this a real risk or a rationalized fear?"
- "Have I given this idea a fair hearing?"
Decision Points
When to Kill an Idea
- Core assumption is invalidated
- Risk/reward is unfavorable
- Better alternatives exist
- Resources are better spent elsewhere
- The team doesn't believe in it
When to Proceed Despite Concerns
- Risks are known and accepted
- Mitigations are in place
- Upside justifies downside
- We'll learn something valuable either way
- Not deciding is worse than deciding
When to Investigate More
- Key assumptions are untested
- Risks are unclear
- We're missing information
- Expert opinion is divided
- Stakes are high
The Skeptic's Toolkit
Questions
- "What's the evidence?"
- "What are we assuming?"
- "What could go wrong?"
- "Who disagrees, and why?"
- "What would change our mind?"
Techniques
- Pre-mortem analysis
- Red team exercises
- Assumption mapping
- Risk registers
- Devil's advocate role
Outputs
- List of assumptions (tested/untested)
- Risk register with severity and likelihood
- Failure modes and mitigations
- Questions that need answers
- Conditions that would change the decision
The Balance
Skepticism Needs a Counterweight
- Dreaming without skepticism is fantasy
- Skepticism without dreaming is paralysis
- The goal is not to kill ideas but to strengthen them
- Some ideas should survive scrutiny
When to Switch Modes
- Dreaming phase: Suspend skepticism, expand possibilities
- Evaluation phase: Apply skepticism, test rigorously
- Execution phase: Skepticism becomes risk management
- Know which phase you're in
The Ultimate Test
A good skeptic asks:
- "Is this idea stronger for having been challenged?"
- "Are the remaining risks acceptable?"
- "Would a reasonable person proceed?"
If yes, the skeptic's job is done.
Mantras
- "What am I not seeing?"
- "Hope is not a strategy"
- "The market doesn't care about your intentions"
- "Reality is not optional"
- "Better to find the flaw than have it find you"
- "Strong opinions, loosely held"
- "Doubt is not disloyalty"
- "The goal is truth, not comfort"