| name | team-dynamics |
| version | 2.0.0 |
| description | Master team dynamics, leadership principles, delegation, 1-on-1s, mentoring, and people management for engineering managers |
| sasmp_version | 1.3.0 |
| bonded_agent | 01-team-leadership-agent |
| bond_type | PRIMARY_BOND |
| category | people-management |
| input_validation | [object Object] |
| retry_config | [object Object] |
| observability | [object Object] |
Team Dynamics & Leadership Skill
Purpose
Provide engineering managers with actionable frameworks, templates, and guidance for building high-performing teams, running effective 1-on-1s, delegating effectively, and developing psychological safety.
Primary Bond
Agent: team-leadership-agent Relationship: This skill provides the foundational templates and frameworks that the team-leadership-agent uses to guide managers.
Templates
1-on-1 Meeting Template
one_on_one_meeting:
duration: "30-60 min"
frequency: "Weekly recommended"
structure:
opening:
duration: "5 min"
focus:
- "Personal check-in"
- "Energy/mood assessment"
- "Their agenda items"
their_agenda:
duration: "15-20 min"
questions:
- "What's on your mind?"
- "What's blocking you?"
- "What wins to celebrate?"
- "What do you need from me?"
development:
duration: "10 min"
topics:
- "Progress on goals"
- "Skill development"
- "Career conversation"
feedback:
duration: "5-10 min"
bidirectional:
- "Manager to report"
- "Report to manager"
closing:
duration: "5 min"
outputs:
- "Action items documented"
- "Next meeting focus"
- "Support committed"
Delegation Framework (RACI)
delegation_levels:
L1_direct:
authority: "Full decision authority"
support: "Available on request"
check_in: "Weekly"
use_when: "Experienced, proven track record"
L2_coach:
authority: "Decision authority with input"
support: "Proactive guidance"
check_in: "Bi-weekly"
use_when: "Growing, needs development"
L3_supervise:
authority: "Recommendation only"
support: "Active supervision"
check_in: "Daily"
use_when: "New to task, learning"
L4_control:
authority: "Execution only"
support: "Continuous oversight"
check_in: "Real-time"
use_when: "Critical task, new team member"
delegation_handoff_checklist:
- "Define outcome clearly (what done looks like)"
- "Explain context and why"
- "Clarify authority level (L1-L4)"
- "Set check-in schedule"
- "Confirm understanding"
- "Document decision rights"
Team Health Assessment
team_health_pulse:
dimensions:
psychological_safety:
questions:
- "I can speak up without fear"
- "Mistakes are learning opportunities"
- "I can ask 'dumb' questions"
scale: "1-5"
target: ">4.0"
clarity:
questions:
- "I know what's expected of me"
- "Team goals are clear"
- "My role is well-defined"
scale: "1-5"
target: ">4.0"
collaboration:
questions:
- "Team members help each other"
- "Information flows freely"
- "Conflicts are resolved constructively"
scale: "1-5"
target: ">4.0"
engagement:
questions:
- "I feel valued"
- "My work is meaningful"
- "I have growth opportunities"
scale: "1-5"
target: ">4.0"
interpretation:
excellent: ">4.5"
good: "4.0-4.4"
concerning: "3.5-3.9"
critical: "<3.5"
cadence: "Monthly pulse, Quarterly deep-dive"
Conflict Resolution Protocol
conflict_resolution:
step_1_assess:
- "Identify conflict type (interpersonal vs task)"
- "Determine urgency and impact"
- "Gather facts (not opinions)"
step_2_individual:
- "Meet with each party separately"
- "Listen without judgment"
- "Understand interests (not positions)"
- "Document key points"
step_3_joint:
- "Facilitate joint session"
- "Establish ground rules"
- "Focus on interests, not positions"
- "Generate options together"
step_4_resolve:
- "Agree on solution"
- "Document commitments"
- "Set follow-up date"
- "Communicate to team if needed"
escalation_triggers:
- "No progress after 2 joint sessions"
- "Policy or legal concerns"
- "Harassment or discrimination"
- "Safety concerns"
Decision Trees
When to Delegate
Task arrives
|
+-- Is this strategic/confidential?
| +-- Yes -> Keep it
| +-- No -> Continue
|
+-- Does someone else have better skills?
| +-- Yes -> Delegate to them
| +-- No -> Continue
|
+-- Is this a growth opportunity?
| +-- Yes -> Delegate with L2/L3 support
| +-- No -> Continue
|
+-- Do I have capacity?
+-- Yes -> Consider keeping, but still evaluate delegation
+-- No -> Must delegate, find right person
1-on-1 Frequency Decision
Team Member Situation
|
+-- New to role (<3 months)
| +-- Weekly, 45-60 min
|
+-- Struggling or PIP
| +-- Weekly or bi-weekly, 45 min
|
+-- Solid performer
| +-- Bi-weekly, 30 min
|
+-- High performer, autonomous
+-- Bi-weekly or monthly, 30 min
+-- But always available on request
Anti-Patterns
anti_patterns:
micromanagement:
symptoms:
- "Checking in multiple times daily"
- "Redoing delegated work"
- "Requiring approval for small decisions"
remedy:
- "Focus on outcomes, not tasks"
- "Set clear success criteria upfront"
- "Trust and verify, don't hover"
absentee_manager:
symptoms:
- "Skipping 1-on-1s regularly"
- "Not knowing team's blockers"
- "Surprised by performance issues"
remedy:
- "Protect 1-on-1 time as sacred"
- "Weekly team check-ins"
- "Daily async standups"
conflict_avoidance:
symptoms:
- "Letting issues fester"
- "Not giving tough feedback"
- "Hoping problems resolve themselves"
remedy:
- "Address within 48 hours"
- "Use SBI feedback model"
- "Document and follow up"
Quick Reference Cards
SBI Feedback Model
Situation: "In yesterday's standup..."
Behavior: "When you interrupted Sarah..."
Impact: "It made her hesitant to share ideas..."
GROW Coaching Model
Goal: "What do you want to achieve?"
Reality: "Where are you now?"
Options: "What could you do?"
Will: "What will you do?"
Tuckman's Stages
Forming -> Storming -> Norming -> Performing -> Adjourning
| | | | |
Polite Conflict Standards High-perf Transition
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Root Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| 1-on-1s feel awkward | No agenda, manager talks too much | Use template, listen 80% |
| Delegation fails | Unclear expectations | Use handoff checklist |
| Team silent in meetings | Low psychological safety | Leader vulnerability, invite input |
| Constant escalations | Over-delegation to wrong level | Match task to L1-L4 level |
Validation Rules
input_validation:
team_size:
type: integer
min: 1
max: 50
required: false
situation:
type: string
min_length: 10
required: true
urgency:
type: enum
values: [low, medium, high, critical]
default: medium
Resources
Books:
- The Manager's Path - Camille Fournier
- Radical Candor - Kim Scott
- Turn the Ship Around - David Marquet
- High Output Management - Andy Grove
Research:
- Google's Project Aristotle (psychological safety)
- Gallup Q12 engagement research