| name | stakeholder-communication |
| version | 2.0.0 |
| description | Stakeholder management, executive communication, and organizational alignment for product leaders. |
| sasmp_version | 1.3.0 |
| bonded_agent | 07-leadership-stakeholder |
| bond_type | PRIMARY_BOND |
| parameters | [object Object], [object Object] |
| retry_logic | [object Object] |
| logging | [object Object] |
Stakeholder Communication Skill
Effectively communicate with stakeholders and manage expectations across the organization. Master executive communication and alignment.
Executive Communication
BLUF Format (Bottom Line Up Front)
BOTTOM LINE: [1 sentence - decision/news]
SITUATION: [2-3 sentences - context]
IMPLICATIONS: [2-3 sentences - why it matters]
NEXT STEPS: [Actions needed]
Executive Summary Template
TITLE: [Topic]
DATE: [Date]
OWNER: [Name]
SUMMARY:
[2-3 sentence overview]
KEY METRICS:
- Metric 1: [Current vs Target]
- Metric 2: [Current vs Target]
DECISION NEEDED:
[What you need from reader]
TIMELINE:
[Key dates]
Stakeholder Management
Stakeholder Matrix
HIGH INFLUENCE
│
MANAGE │ ENGAGE
CLOSELY │ ACTIVELY
(Weekly) │ (Weekly)
│
LOW ─────────────┼───────────── HIGH
INTEREST │ INTEREST
│
MONITOR │ KEEP
ONLY │ INFORMED
(Quarterly) │ (Bi-weekly)
│
LOW INFLUENCE
RACI Matrix
| Task |
Responsible |
Accountable |
Consulted |
Informed |
| Task 1 |
Dev Lead |
PM |
Design |
Eng Team |
| Task 2 |
PM |
CEO |
Sales |
All |
Presentation Skills
Presentation Structure (15 min)
1. Hook (1 min) - Why should they care?
2. Context (2 min) - Background
3. Problem (2 min) - What's wrong
4. Solution (5 min) - What you propose
5. Impact (3 min) - Benefits & metrics
6. Ask (2 min) - What you need
Data Visualization Rules
- One point per chart
- Labels on chart, not legend
- Highlight key data
- Remove chart junk
- Use consistent colors
Written Communication
Status Update Template
PROJECT: [Name]
STATUS: On Track / At Risk / Off Track
PROGRESS THIS WEEK:
- [Completed item]
- [Completed item]
NEXT WEEK:
- [Planned item]
- [Planned item]
BLOCKERS:
- [Blocker + mitigation]
METRICS:
- [KPI]: [Value vs Target]
Decision Document
DECISION: [What we decided]
DATE: [Date]
PARTICIPANTS: [Who was involved]
CONTEXT:
[Why this decision was needed]
OPTIONS CONSIDERED:
1. [Option A] - Pros/Cons
2. [Option B] - Pros/Cons
DECISION RATIONALE:
[Why we chose this option]
NEXT STEPS:
- [Action] - Owner - Date
Troubleshooting
Yaygın Hatalar & Çözümler
| Hata |
Olası Sebep |
Çözüm |
| Stakeholder surprise |
No early warning |
Increase frequency |
| Misalignment |
Unclear communication |
BLUF, document |
| No decision |
Too many stakeholders |
RACI, single decider |
| Resistance |
Not included early |
Early involvement |
Debug Checklist
[ ] RACI defined mi?
[ ] Communication cadence set mi?
[ ] Key stakeholders informed mi?
[ ] Decisions documented mi?
[ ] Follow-up scheduled mi?
Recovery Procedures
- Stakeholder Surprise → 1:1 meeting, rebuild trust
- Misalignment → Alignment meeting, document
- Decision Deadlock → Escalate with recommendation
Learning Outcomes
- Present effectively to executives
- Manage stakeholder expectations
- Write clear status updates
- Build organizational alignment
- Handle difficult conversations